The number of people recieving government benefits outnumbers full time workers

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by PSGator66, Oct 25, 2013.

  1. PSGator66

    PSGator66 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2011
    Messages:
    6,339
    Likes Received:
    164
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +717
  2. philnotfil

    philnotfil Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    12,529
    Likes Received:
    155
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +539
    How many people were in both categories?

    It appears that their number of recipients includes children, how might this skew the results?
  3. TJtheGator

    TJtheGator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,974
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Winter Springs, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +433
    Regardless of any political ideology (and this reeks of communism), consider this in terms of simple mathematics, the true universal languange:

    Government dependents > full-time workers= BROKE AS A FREAKING JOKE.
  4. orangeblueorangeblue

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    This has actually happened a few times in the past. Keep in mind that you're calling, for example, retired military "government dependents."
  5. secgator

    secgator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    10,626
    Likes Received:
    304
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +805
    You gotta look at the 'big picture' phil. This is essentially the same as over in the middle east--you have full grown terrorists and then little terrorists who grow up to be adult, full grown terrorists.

    Same thing here as you have the full grown adult moochers, and the little moochers will grow up to be adult, full grown moochers.

    Think big and in the long run....not in the present day status. Just looking at these numbers present day doesn't give the clear picture. Project yourself out 15-20 years when the whole country will be comprised of full blown, full grown, liberal moochers, takers, and do-nothings.
  6. wgbgator

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    23,116
    Likes Received:
    403
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,674
    Indeed, its totally possible to work full-time and qualify for food stamps, medicaid, WIC, and other gov't assistance, especially if you have children.
  7. wygator

    wygator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    6,452
    Likes Received:
    289
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +944
    The numbers are in the article:

    Yes, the first number counts people in household receiving the benefit. Of course, many of the benefits are specifically for families with children and many of the households were receiving multiple types of benefits:

    If you then add SS and Medicare that are non-means tested, the total people receiving government support jumps up to 151,014,000. This is unsustainable.
  8. TJtheGator

    TJtheGator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,974
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Winter Springs, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +433
    Exactly the reason we are in this mess. No one can think long term. No one can save money for 10 years to buy a house. They get a sub-prime loan with 100% financing and buy the house now. No one saves for retiremet. It's easier to blow whatever you have (and some of what you don't) on stuff now instead of saving.

    Americans don't think about down the road repercussions. They can't see past the tip of their noses.

    Planning for retirement? Never heard of that.....
  9. wygator

    wygator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    6,452
    Likes Received:
    289
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +944
  10. rpmGator

    rpmGator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    12,791
    Likes Received:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +632
    Since neither side looks to be in a hurry to get rid of tax loopholes that help keep jobs offshore, it looks like the push for jobs here is waiting in line behind those making the profit now.

    Looks like a clear case of need for full time jobs.
  11. wygator

    wygator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    6,452
    Likes Received:
    289
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +944
    .
  12. wgbgator

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    23,116
    Likes Received:
    403
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,674
    WRT to the OP, full-time jobs are meaningless if they pay so little as to still qualify you for various gov't assistance. We need full-time jobs that aren't McJobs.
  13. wygator

    wygator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    6,452
    Likes Received:
    289
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +944
    The article is specifically referencing means-tested benefits.
  14. rpmGator

    rpmGator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    12,791
    Likes Received:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +632
    Good paying jobs are under attack on all fronts. Even the immigration bill has people demanding to allow high skilled, lower wage import computer people into the nation ahead of orange pickers.

    You already hear it from many the need to move to better quality people immigrating which is code for we want cheaper labor to remove even more good paying jobs.
  15. GT Gator

    GT Gator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    1,560
    Likes Received:
    72
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +217
    What's the problem?

    As someone who will eventually retire from the military, I can tell you that when I start getting paid my retirement, I will in fact be a government dependent.

    And, I would be very happy to see our government cut back on its military spending. In a post Cold War, we should drastically cut back on the number of military retirees.

    Regardless, the community of military retirees are relatively tiny. There are only 2 million military retirees currently. That's less than 2% of the total number of government dependents.
  16. oragator1

    oragator1 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    12,729
    Likes Received:
    427
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,603
    We are an increasingly 2 tier society - those that have the modern skills to create and maintain the technology needed in today's world, and those who provide services (many menial) for those that do.

    Those in the latter category are being left behind, job or no job.
  17. philobeddoe

    philobeddoe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Messages:
    6,604
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +403
    Full time workers are supporting their own dependents, if they have any + all those on federal assistance.

    Now ... I would eliminate any folks on SS retirement benefits if they are included in the federal number and they are receiving benefits based solely on their former employment in the private sector.
  18. LostReptile

    LostReptile New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Messages:
    447
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +6
    why work when the government will give you a bunch of stuff for free!! loaded EBT cards, free housing, free medical care, cellphone, bus passes!

    working is too hard---free stuff is easier.
  19. gatordowneast

    gatordowneast Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    11,747
    Likes Received:
    303
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +985
    As Dave Ramsey says about Obamacare...it's about the math. The math doesn't work. Same thing here. When more are in the wagon than there are pulling the wagon, the math won't work and the horses break down or go on strike. (if they are union horses)
  20. wgbgator

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    23,116
    Likes Received:
    403
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,674
    The math better work, for the sake of capitalism, that or something akin to a 2nd industrial revolution must occur, where a massive labor force is actually needed by the economy.

Share This Page