Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by PSGator66, Jul 24, 2013.
Typical libbie drivel from you pit
Nana the evidence supports this claim - you bleeding hearts just cannot accept it or get over it-
Leftists don't like facts.....that is why they can't handle this situation
another example is that they ignore all of the facts regarding TM and that he was out at night walking in the rain so that he could get high.
They don't like the evidence because it validates everything GZ said
So the media brained washed everyone to believe zimmerman despite overwhelming evidence contrary to the facts? The da was lazy and not motivated to get a conviction? The judge did everything in her power to help the defense out? Zimmerman has not been dragged through the mud over and over and over?
The media went way overbkard to convince everyone of zimmermans guilt. (Doctored audio tapes, pictures of travon when he was 12). ALL the evidence collabrorated the zimmerman story. Even the witnesses that the prosecution called helped the defense. The da was motivated to convict because of the outside pressure. Media, mobs of people rioting (not much but somewhat) president obama chiming in etc....) The judge did everything in her power to handcuff the defense...to the point many were sure if the verdict came back guilty the defense could call for a mistrial. And for those concerned about tm's good name being dragged through the mud..what about zimmermans. The guy will never be able to live a normal life now. All because he was attacked by a drug addict teenage thug and defended himself. Loom at the evidence.
The media actually helped Zimmerman.....gave his family and friends a place to get out his various version of events and gave life to the thug image later associated with Trayvon.
Fabricating non-existent facts from your own speculative bias and devaluing due process and our legal system to reach your own make-believe verdict is pretty sickening, I think.
Even if true none of this actually mattered in the court of law where GZ was found not guilty by a jury of his peers.
Heh. Yeah, I'm sure George Zimmerman thanks his lucky stars every day for the media's coverage of his case. Heh.
If he doesnt, he should, if only because it strengthened his legal defense fund and got him some quality pro bono legal council.
It's the media's coverage of the aftermath that leaves a lot to be desired.
Nana..don't panic but I think Chomp is channeling you and putting out his Leatherman info!:grin:
I suppose a systemic campaign of libel, false lights, and general straw arguments of racism will tend to do that.
Tell ya what -- he really will thank them a little when NBC has to cut their check.
Most whites I know didn't whine at all.They just sort of shrugged their shoulders with a "what did you expect from that kind of a jury?" reaction.
Speaking of fabrication.....there was too much fabricating from Zimmerman for me to believe his version of events. I haven't devalued the legal process.....simply do not agree with the verdict.
The family that were rescued from an overturned vehicle, had to cancel a press conference when they too are facing hate for not dying and allowing themselves to be rescued by Z.
Some of you are special indeed.
Do you believe that you were more privy to & discerning of all the evidence & testimony than the jury or the Seminole County & Sanford PD?
Or were all those involved a part of a great conspiracy to slant & suppress the truth?
Please feel free ti post any factual evidence of this
There's so much and from many sources, I don't know where to begin. It makes me wonder about those who believe Zimmerman's story did they read and watch all the interviews given by his family and friends....take notice that the story changed.
Zimmerman's past isn't an issue with many but Trayvon's is....whether it's accurate or not. The issue of staying silent while his wife lied in court as to their financial situation evidently didn't matter either....even with the hours of taped jail conversations between the two on hiding their money.
There's plenty of factual evidence out there that was never admitted in court....the totality of all the information leads me to believe Zimmerman was not telling the entire truth as to his own actions that night.
As to the legal process, it did what it was suppose to do. Zimmerman's story was believed so the jury found him not-guilty.....it is what it is. The pros did a very poor job.
You just reinforced my point, and are indeed devaluing the legal process. You're saying the jury, who was privy to every piece of evidence, fact and witness testimony available about the case made a legal mistake because they don't know what you know about the case.