The Black Panthers want Zimmerman Killed

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by montyw64, Jul 14, 2013.

  1. Gatormb
    Offline

    Gatormb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    8,972
    Likes Received:
    298
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Bradenton, Fl
    Ratings Received:
    +905
    I believe what Senoir Dog is accurately saying is the jury in effect has accepted that Mr. Z WAS being assaulted (aggravated) and therefore had a right to defend himself.

    It's clear to me there was (that the jury accepted) but one crime. Aggravated assault resulting in fear for life. In effect TM is the guilty party and unfortunately paid the ultimate price.

    Had he survived he could well have been charged with AA.

    Correct counselors?
  2. mdgator05
    Online

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2010
    Messages:
    6,801
    Likes Received:
    200
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +715
    The jury verdict only illuminates the fact that something could have happened, not that it did happen or that we have enough evidence to confidently state that it happened.
  3. MichaelJoeWilliamson
    Offline

    MichaelJoeWilliamson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Messages:
    6,820
    Likes Received:
    415
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +497


    You are correct about one thing. The link to the webcast no longer works. My apologies for that. It worked when I originally linked to the site.

    The video is easily found. All one had to do to find the video is to bing "youtube Holder white people are not protected by hate crimes." It is the first hit.

    Enjoy!


    (If that proves too much for you to manage, here is the video)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOABBn5Tnm0
  4. Row6
    Offline

    Row6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +26
    The most you can say is that the jury accepted the idea of GZ being assaulted and therefore acting in self defense as a reasonable possibility and thus enough to establish reasonable doubt as to his guilt. If the jury was tasked with accepting that GZ had definitely acted in self defense, his ass might possibly be in jail right now. You can't have it both ways.
  5. jimgata
    Offline

    jimgata Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    8,918
    Likes Received:
    202
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +1,095
    Legal justice was obtained when the verdict was read. The only justice left is REVENGE.
    You either love by the law or you don't.
  6. neisgator
    Offline

    neisgator Belligerent Gator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    10,618
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Quincy IL
    Ratings Received:
    +106
    This from the guy who said to another poster yesterday:

    If my aunt had nuts she'd be my uncle?
  7. Lawdog88
    Offline

    Lawdog88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    30,544
    Likes Received:
    563
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Inside the War Room, No Name City, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +2,029

    Actually, that is the very least you can say.

    The most you can say - which comports with what we know about the facts the jury accepted as true, i.e., GZ's - is that GZ clearly established the defense in all respects, and that the jury applied the law to the evidence, again, as they were required to do, and acquitted accordingly.

    You insist on your version; I will accept what the juror said.
    • Like Like x 1
  8. candymanfromgc
    Offline

    candymanfromgc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    5,351
    Likes Received:
    114
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +369
    The racist AG needs a teleprompter even more than Barry. What a joke-and it's on us.
    • Like Like x 2
  9. Wormwood56
    Online

    Wormwood56 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2011
    Messages:
    6,384
    Likes Received:
    552
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    San Antonio, TX
    Ratings Received:
    +2,183
    And now this embarrassment to the Justice Department is denying Jorge his property without having a case to support it. What an inept, incompetent clown Holder is. The Corinne Brown of the Obama Administration...
    • Like Like x 1
  10. Row6
    Offline

    Row6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +26
    Posted by the Archie Bunker of TH
  11. Row6
    Offline

    Row6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +26

    I meant "the most t you can say" as in "without making things up". You're free to do that of course and regularly exercise that right. Your reliance on one juror who has already been slapped down publicly by 4 of the remaining 5 (for those keeping score, that's most of them), while she herself said 3 of the jurors entered deliberations wanting a conviction, says it all about your standards for truth.
  12. Matthanuf06
    Offline

    Matthanuf06 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    10,825
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +17
    He would have been charged. However the same cause for reasonable doubt would exist as it did for GZ. It wouldn't be as powerful but it would exist. My guess is that it would have been 50/50 for TM getting convicted compared to 5/95 for GZ. However in TM case he would have probably pleaded way down so that would have been moot.
  13. DaveFla
    Offline

    DaveFla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    18,375
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +979
    The DOJ ignoring laws again...

    Typical.
  14. rpmGator
    Offline

    rpmGator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    12,841
    Likes Received:
    171
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +678
    If the aunt had balls she would be the uncle. If the uncle had balls he wouldn't have married the aunt.

    I worry about the Pink Panther as much as any other type.
  15. HallGator
    Online

    HallGator Administrator VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    43,642
    Likes Received:
    948
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Outer Limits
    Ratings Received:
    +3,730
    Basing it on evidence presented in the trial, yes they do. Basing it on supposition, they don't.
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Row6
    Offline

    Row6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +26
    There is no evidence other than GZ's claims - which are obviously self interested - which establishes the facts surrounding the beginning of the physical confrontation. Sorry.
  17. DaveFla
    Offline

    DaveFla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    18,375
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +979
    ... No evidence my @ss.

    Pictures of a bloody Zimmerman. Eye witnesses placing Martin o top of Zimmerman. Ballistics indicating Martin was on top of Zimmerman. Grass stains showing Martin was on top of Zimmerman...

    Yea. No evidence.
  18. neisgator
    Offline

    neisgator Belligerent Gator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    10,618
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Quincy IL
    Ratings Received:
    +106
    Just let him live in his delusional fake pretend upside down world
  19. Row6
    Offline

    Row6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +26
    I wrote:

    "There is no evidence other than GZ's claims - which are obviously self interested - which establishes the facts surrounding the beginning of the physical confrontation. Sorry."

    Your post addresses events occurring after the physical confrontation began.
  20. DaveFla
    Offline

    DaveFla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    18,375
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +979
    It has been explained to you, time and time again already, that how it began simply does not make a difference. Once the altercation took a life or death turn, the shooting became justified. You're being obtuse.

Share This Page