The Black Panthers want Zimmerman Killed

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by montyw64, Jul 14, 2013.

  1. Gatormb

    Gatormb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    8,878
    Likes Received:
    258
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Bradenton, Fl
    Ratings Received:
    +814
    I believe what Senoir Dog is accurately saying is the jury in effect has accepted that Mr. Z WAS being assaulted (aggravated) and therefore had a right to defend himself.

    It's clear to me there was (that the jury accepted) but one crime. Aggravated assault resulting in fear for life. In effect TM is the guilty party and unfortunately paid the ultimate price.

    Had he survived he could well have been charged with AA.

    Correct counselors?
  2. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2010
    Messages:
    6,436
    Likes Received:
    133
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +534
    The jury verdict only illuminates the fact that something could have happened, not that it did happen or that we have enough evidence to confidently state that it happened.
  3. MichaelJoeWilliamson

    MichaelJoeWilliamson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Messages:
    6,820
    Likes Received:
    415
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +497


    You are correct about one thing. The link to the webcast no longer works. My apologies for that. It worked when I originally linked to the site.

    The video is easily found. All one had to do to find the video is to bing "youtube Holder white people are not protected by hate crimes." It is the first hit.

    Enjoy!


    (If that proves too much for you to manage, here is the video)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOABBn5Tnm0
  4. Row6

    Row6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +26
    The most you can say is that the jury accepted the idea of GZ being assaulted and therefore acting in self defense as a reasonable possibility and thus enough to establish reasonable doubt as to his guilt. If the jury was tasked with accepting that GZ had definitely acted in self defense, his ass might possibly be in jail right now. You can't have it both ways.
  5. jimgata

    jimgata Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    8,472
    Likes Received:
    119
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +684
    Legal justice was obtained when the verdict was read. The only justice left is REVENGE.
    You either love by the law or you don't.
  6. neisgator

    neisgator Belligerent Gator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    10,618
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Quincy IL
    Ratings Received:
    +106
    This from the guy who said to another poster yesterday:

    If my aunt had nuts she'd be my uncle?
  7. Lawdog88

    Lawdog88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    30,325
    Likes Received:
    504
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Inside the War Room, No Name City, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,770

    Actually, that is the very least you can say.

    The most you can say - which comports with what we know about the facts the jury accepted as true, i.e., GZ's - is that GZ clearly established the defense in all respects, and that the jury applied the law to the evidence, again, as they were required to do, and acquitted accordingly.

    You insist on your version; I will accept what the juror said.
    • Like Like x 1
  8. candymanfromgc

    candymanfromgc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    5,307
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +295
    The racist AG needs a teleprompter even more than Barry. What a joke-and it's on us.
    • Like Like x 2
  9. Wormwood56

    Wormwood56 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2011
    Messages:
    5,448
    Likes Received:
    330
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,338
    And now this embarrassment to the Justice Department is denying Jorge his property without having a case to support it. What an inept, incompetent clown Holder is. The Corinne Brown of the Obama Administration...
    • Like Like x 1
  10. Row6

    Row6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +26
    Posted by the Archie Bunker of TH
  11. Row6

    Row6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +26

    I meant "the most t you can say" as in "without making things up". You're free to do that of course and regularly exercise that right. Your reliance on one juror who has already been slapped down publicly by 4 of the remaining 5 (for those keeping score, that's most of them), while she herself said 3 of the jurors entered deliberations wanting a conviction, says it all about your standards for truth.
  12. Matthanuf06

    Matthanuf06 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    10,825
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +17
    He would have been charged. However the same cause for reasonable doubt would exist as it did for GZ. It wouldn't be as powerful but it would exist. My guess is that it would have been 50/50 for TM getting convicted compared to 5/95 for GZ. However in TM case he would have probably pleaded way down so that would have been moot.
  13. DaveFla

    DaveFla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    18,380
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +979
    The DOJ ignoring laws again...

    Typical.
  14. rpmGator

    rpmGator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    12,693
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +566
    If the aunt had balls she would be the uncle. If the uncle had balls he wouldn't have married the aunt.

    I worry about the Pink Panther as much as any other type.
  15. HallGator

    HallGator Administrator VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    43,331
    Likes Received:
    895
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Outer Limits
    Ratings Received:
    +3,421
    Basing it on evidence presented in the trial, yes they do. Basing it on supposition, they don't.
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Row6

    Row6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +26
    There is no evidence other than GZ's claims - which are obviously self interested - which establishes the facts surrounding the beginning of the physical confrontation. Sorry.
  17. DaveFla

    DaveFla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    18,380
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +979
    ... No evidence my @ss.

    Pictures of a bloody Zimmerman. Eye witnesses placing Martin o top of Zimmerman. Ballistics indicating Martin was on top of Zimmerman. Grass stains showing Martin was on top of Zimmerman...

    Yea. No evidence.
  18. neisgator

    neisgator Belligerent Gator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    10,618
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Quincy IL
    Ratings Received:
    +106
    Just let him live in his delusional fake pretend upside down world
  19. Row6

    Row6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +26
    I wrote:

    "There is no evidence other than GZ's claims - which are obviously self interested - which establishes the facts surrounding the beginning of the physical confrontation. Sorry."

    Your post addresses events occurring after the physical confrontation began.
  20. DaveFla

    DaveFla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    18,380
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +979
    It has been explained to you, time and time again already, that how it began simply does not make a difference. Once the altercation took a life or death turn, the shooting became justified. You're being obtuse.

Share This Page