So we have absolutely nothing going on offense, so much so that Pease (or Will) is about to lose a job over it. Yet, after a little trickeration in the first half, we shut er down after we hit 14 points. It was almost like Pease called a Boise or a Fedora style gameplan in the first half, then went all Muschampian in the second half. Why did we not take more chances in the second half on offense? And if you say "we had the lead and wanted to rest on our solid D", then why oh why is Muschamp more willing to take high risks with the D? Many times, the USCe RBs gashed us when we were all-out blitzing, esp on the 58 yd run from the back of their own end zone. So we suck on offense, but won't take gambles, but instead we take high risks with the players on D that are supposed to be our strength? Makes no sense.