So who voted to allow poor children to starve?

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by Gatorstooth, Sep 20, 2013.

  1. kygator
    Offline

    kygator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    2,799
    Likes Received:
    85
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +213
    So you believe that they were able to identify all the fraud in the system and it came out to 1%?
  2. cjgator76
    Offline

    cjgator76 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    17,026
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +294
    Earlier this year the Senate voted to trim $4.5 billion - that's billion, with a "b" - from SNAP. So even under the Senate version, helpless children are going to starve in the streets.

    I would like to see a list of all the Senators who voted to allow poor children to starve. If we're going to identify the Congressional fans of baby starving, let's shine the bright light of condemnation on ALL of the despicable bastids.
  3. Gatorstooth
    Offline

    Gatorstooth New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2012
    Messages:
    492
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +19
    Seriously? Being a sinner doesn't excuse a person to increase the poor's suffering.

    Jesus said that the poor would always be with us (Matthew 26:11; Mark 14:7). He also said that those who show mercy to the poor, the sick and the needy are in effect ministering to Him personally (Matthew 25:35-40) and will be rewarded accordingly.

    Proverbs 14:31 (ESV)
    31 Whoever oppresses a poor man insults his Maker, but he who is generous to the needy honors him.

    “If anyone has material possessions and sees his brother in need but has no pity on him, how can the love of God be in him? Dear children let us not love with words or tongue but with action and in truth” (1 John 3:17-18).

    "But when you give a banquet, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind." Luke 14:13
  4. g8rjd
    Offline

    g8rjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    7,157
    Likes Received:
    257
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Tallahassee, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +352
    Quality Swift reference. Well played. Very well played.
  5. gator996
    Offline

    gator996 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,963
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +15

    That's what the auditors found.

    Who would you like to conduct the audit so that you would believe it?
  6. cjgator76
    Offline

    cjgator76 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    17,026
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +294
    Yes, it was, and I neglected to compliment wgb earlier so I'll do it now.
  7. kygator
    Offline

    kygator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    2,799
    Likes Received:
    85
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +213
    I wouldn't believe any person that said they conducted an audit and were able to identify every instance of fraud. I don't think you actually believe it either because you aren't that naive. An accurate statement might be that the fraud that they did uncover amounted to 1% but that they have no idea how much they weren't able to uncover.
  8. malligator
    Offline

    malligator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    3,230
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Ahwatukee
    Ratings Received:
    +265
    Overly dramatic thread title, but I guess a true thread title like "Senate reduces SNAP budget by 5% over the next 10 years" isn't sensational enough.

    No one is going to starve, but I have a feeling our liberal forum members already knew that.
  9. gator996
    Offline

    gator996 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,963
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +15
    kygator

    Then in your "logic" no audit of anything...corporate or public...would be a legitimate audit.

    Auditors use accounting rules to audit organizations and them certify them as true and representative.

    Even if one was to play your game, what's the true fraud rate?
    10% (10x's)
    20% (20x's)

    That's still the overwhelming majority of the funding ISN'T fraudulent.


    You might think the silliness of your argument is defendable....

    But in reality its not.

    Not event the conservatives who are actually arguing this in congress have taken up the fraud argument (Cantor dropped it). They're simply arguing the spending issue, and no one is willing to make the claim that this cut is material.

    Cut SNAP to zero....you still have a debt issue.
    • Like Like x 1
  10. gator996
    Offline

    gator996 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,963
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +15

    Tell that to the million plus starving already....or those keep out of starving by SNAP.

    Do you really believe no one in this country goes undernourished?
  11. GT Gator
    Offline

    GT Gator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +185
    Oh please stop with the silly histrionics!

    The Republicans votes for a $4 Billion per year reduction in an $80 Billion a year program. That's a 5% reduction in SNAP.

    What levels will that put us back to? It would put 2014 expenditures back to somewhere between 2012 and 2013 levels, which are still an absolutely amazing $42 Billion more than we spent during GWB last full year in office.

    Even more amazing is this: Under the proposed "cuts" we would spent $76 Billion per year in SNAP. In Clinton's final year in office (2000), we were only spending $15B per year in SNAP.

    In other words, after the proposed cuts, we would still be spending more than 500% more than we spent under Clinton.

    Wow!
  12. Emmitto
    Online

    Emmitto VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    5,342
    Likes Received:
    145
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +440
    Of course. Once a group is over, oh I don't know, maybe 10, then the likelihood of exactness is diminished greatly. Just like the "estimates" on these boards of how many SNAP recipients take the primo parking spots at stores in their BMW's and load up three carts with beer and cigarettes and cram them in between still-boxed flat screens is likely not accurate. (Well, probably not "just like." A certain poster whose name must not be spoken can't be at all stores at all times to accurately monitor this for us. Sometimes he's busy interrogating people on the street protesting this or that.)
  13. g8rjd
    Offline

    g8rjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    7,157
    Likes Received:
    257
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Tallahassee, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +352
    Interestingly, Henry Olsen in National Review points out that all of the arguments for cutting SNAP also apply to the Federal Crop Insurance program, which no one is proposing be touched:

    http://www.nationalreview.com/node/358914/print
  14. GT Gator
    Offline

    GT Gator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +185
    Yes, we have a HUGE undernourishment problem in the U.S.:

    [​IMG]
  15. jimgata
    Offline

    jimgata Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    8,288
    Likes Received:
    114
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +546
    Yeah, they are really being cruel, asking every able bodied person between 18 and 59 that are capable of working to hunt a job or join a work program to find a job, in order to get food stamps.
  16. PIMking
    Offline

    PIMking New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    10,535
    Likes Received:
    895
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tuscaloosa, AL (Ft. Myers)
    Ratings Received:
    +895
    You mean like having gas stations take food stamps now?
  17. cjgator76
    Offline

    cjgator76 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    17,026
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +294
    Don't forget all the old people living on dog food.



    [​IMG]
  18. gator996
    Offline

    gator996 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,963
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +15

    How many people would be kicked out of the program?
    :lie:
  19. Gatorstooth
    Offline

    Gatorstooth New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2012
    Messages:
    492
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +19
    I see you've been we'll trained in speaking euphemistically. However, a lot more people than you think can see right through it.
  20. LittleBlueLW
    Offline

    LittleBlueLW Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    5,257
    Likes Received:
    717
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +986
    Dont start killing them with facts. They'll just put their fingers in their ears and start humming to themselves.

    I think it is sad that so many make it their daily calling to gripe about what other people have.

Share This Page