Signs Point to Healthier Job Market in 2014

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by HallGator, Dec 30, 2013.

  1. HallGator
    Online

    HallGator Administrator VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    42,879
    Likes Received:
    861
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Outer Limits
    Ratings Received:
    +3,090
    From the WSJ.

    Politics aside, it should be good news for all of us if true.

  2. Gatoragman
    Offline

    Gatoragman VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,081
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Ratings Received:
    +43
    Thank god for Obama and his policy's that are finely kicking in. HAHA
  3. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    56,579
    Likes Received:
    560
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,574
    As ever, the president has almost no impact on this.
  4. 108
    Offline

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    17,602
    Likes Received:
    278
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,050
    curious, would this statement still be true if we had a president do nothing to bailout crumbling industries, offset a lack of spending in the private sector, like many conservatives said we shouldn't?
  5. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    56,579
    Likes Received:
    560
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,574
    In all likelihood, yes.
  6. 108
    Offline

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    17,602
    Likes Received:
    278
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,050
    So we would be at the exact same point, but with less debt?
  7. dangolegators
    Online

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,130
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +540
    No, we'd be worse off. But with possibly the same amount of debt due to lower tax receipts. The spending increases under Obama has been almost entirely mandatory spending that the president has little control over. So we would have had the same amount of spending, but with lower tax receipts due to lower GDP.
  8. mocgator
    Offline

    mocgator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,297
    Likes Received:
    272
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The ATL
    Ratings Received:
    +506
    Hogwash. Tax and regulatory policy AS ALWAYS has a huge impact on this.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    56,579
    Likes Received:
    560
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,574
    Same place, sure, but it's been a relatively negligible impact on debt itself.
  10. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    56,579
    Likes Received:
    560
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,574
  11. dangolegators
    Online

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,130
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +540
  12. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    56,579
    Likes Received:
    560
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,574
    Personal income taxes over time actually accentuates the point.
  13. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    32,555
    Likes Received:
    2,455
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +4,274
    This sign tells us what direction our economy is heading towards.

    [​IMG]
  14. surfn1080
    Offline

    surfn1080 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,094
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +149
    Wrong just wrong. We would of had less debt as we bailed them out and lost most of it. Spending and the money used to bail out those companies are two different things.
  15. tegator80
    Offline

    tegator80 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,928
    Likes Received:
    887
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Richmond, VA
    Ratings Received:
    +1,794
    We can hope that the "Safe to go back into the water" sign is now out. I kind of feel like the economy and jobs are like the shore birds that run in and out based on the waves rolling in. A bigger signal from DC assuring what will be occurring in the next 5-10 years would be quite a big step. But then that would entail making a stand and we know Mr. Obama doesn't want to do that.
  16. dangolegators
    Online

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,130
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +540
    No this is wrong. The bailouts and stimulus, along with monetary policy, prevented things from getting far worse.
  17. dangolegators
    Online

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,130
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +540
    In 1950, personal income taxes made up 40% of federal revenue, corporate income taxes made up about 26% and social insurance taxes made up about 11%. Now personal income taxes make up 46%, corporate income taxes make up 10% and social insurance taxes make up 35%. Corporations are funding a much lower percentage of the government now, but individuals are funding a much higher percentage. It's very difficult to single out corporate income taxes and draw any meaningful conclusions when the entire tax mix is changing so much. Your link has no meaning here.
  18. RealGatorFan
    Offline

    RealGatorFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    13,033
    Likes Received:
    99
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +433
    Oh this has just begun. We will be talking about QE for quite a few decades as people retire and the government will have no choice but cut back nearly 50% of the benefits because we can't afford it anymore. Look at the youth of today and tomorrow. This Ponzi scheme only works when today's young workers pay for the exiting workers benefits. Yet, older workers are staying put and young workers aren't working at all. In fact, over half of the 2009 grads are still not working full-time or not in the area they went to college for. My son graduated from Ga Tech over a year ago and nearly half of his class are still looking for work.
  19. RealGatorFan
    Offline

    RealGatorFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    13,033
    Likes Received:
    99
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +433
    Not for the next 30 to 40 years. This story will be with us past our lifetimes and into the next 2 generations. Actually, the best of times are right now, but as the global population retires, the impact on the revenues of every nation will be felt. With global debt 300% higher than global GDP (think about that number for a moment too), it's only a matter of time when most of the world falls apart. We are in uncharted territory here.
  20. candymanfromgc
    Online

    candymanfromgc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    5,290
    Likes Received:
    103
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +268
    I truly doubt things are getting better. I already know of several places who planned on closing after they got through Christmas. When Barrycare kicks in it will get even worse.

Share This Page