Signs Point to Healthier Job Market in 2014

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by HallGator, Dec 30, 2013.

  1. HallGator
    Online

    HallGator Administrator VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    43,594
    Likes Received:
    938
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Outer Limits
    Ratings Received:
    +3,695
    From the WSJ.

    Politics aside, it should be good news for all of us if true.

  2. Gatoragman
    Offline

    Gatoragman VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,116
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Ratings Received:
    +56
    Thank god for Obama and his policy's that are finely kicking in. HAHA
  3. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    As ever, the president has almost no impact on this.
  4. 108
    Offline

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    17,990
    Likes Received:
    355
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,337
    curious, would this statement still be true if we had a president do nothing to bailout crumbling industries, offset a lack of spending in the private sector, like many conservatives said we shouldn't?
  5. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    In all likelihood, yes.
  6. 108
    Offline

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    17,990
    Likes Received:
    355
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,337
    So we would be at the exact same point, but with less debt?
  7. dangolegators
    Offline

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,396
    Likes Received:
    86
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +656
    No, we'd be worse off. But with possibly the same amount of debt due to lower tax receipts. The spending increases under Obama has been almost entirely mandatory spending that the president has little control over. So we would have had the same amount of spending, but with lower tax receipts due to lower GDP.
  8. mocgator
    Offline

    mocgator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,422
    Likes Received:
    300
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The ATL
    Ratings Received:
    +618
    Hogwash. Tax and regulatory policy AS ALWAYS has a huge impact on this.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    Same place, sure, but it's been a relatively negligible impact on debt itself.
  10. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
  11. dangolegators
    Offline

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,396
    Likes Received:
    86
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +656
  12. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    Personal income taxes over time actually accentuates the point.
  13. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    33,086
    Likes Received:
    2,520
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +4,577
    This sign tells us what direction our economy is heading towards.

    [​IMG]
  14. surfn1080
    Offline

    surfn1080 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +187
    Wrong just wrong. We would of had less debt as we bailed them out and lost most of it. Spending and the money used to bail out those companies are two different things.
  15. tegator80
    Online

    tegator80 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    5,606
    Likes Received:
    985
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Richmond, VA
    Ratings Received:
    +2,307
    We can hope that the "Safe to go back into the water" sign is now out. I kind of feel like the economy and jobs are like the shore birds that run in and out based on the waves rolling in. A bigger signal from DC assuring what will be occurring in the next 5-10 years would be quite a big step. But then that would entail making a stand and we know Mr. Obama doesn't want to do that.
  16. dangolegators
    Offline

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,396
    Likes Received:
    86
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +656
    No this is wrong. The bailouts and stimulus, along with monetary policy, prevented things from getting far worse.
  17. dangolegators
    Offline

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,396
    Likes Received:
    86
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +656
    In 1950, personal income taxes made up 40% of federal revenue, corporate income taxes made up about 26% and social insurance taxes made up about 11%. Now personal income taxes make up 46%, corporate income taxes make up 10% and social insurance taxes make up 35%. Corporations are funding a much lower percentage of the government now, but individuals are funding a much higher percentage. It's very difficult to single out corporate income taxes and draw any meaningful conclusions when the entire tax mix is changing so much. Your link has no meaning here.
  18. RealGatorFan
    Offline

    RealGatorFan Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    13,577
    Likes Received:
    174
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +777
    Oh this has just begun. We will be talking about QE for quite a few decades as people retire and the government will have no choice but cut back nearly 50% of the benefits because we can't afford it anymore. Look at the youth of today and tomorrow. This Ponzi scheme only works when today's young workers pay for the exiting workers benefits. Yet, older workers are staying put and young workers aren't working at all. In fact, over half of the 2009 grads are still not working full-time or not in the area they went to college for. My son graduated from Ga Tech over a year ago and nearly half of his class are still looking for work.
  19. RealGatorFan
    Offline

    RealGatorFan Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    13,577
    Likes Received:
    174
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +777
    Not for the next 30 to 40 years. This story will be with us past our lifetimes and into the next 2 generations. Actually, the best of times are right now, but as the global population retires, the impact on the revenues of every nation will be felt. With global debt 300% higher than global GDP (think about that number for a moment too), it's only a matter of time when most of the world falls apart. We are in uncharted territory here.
  20. candymanfromgc
    Offline

    candymanfromgc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    5,338
    Likes Received:
    111
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +333
    I truly doubt things are getting better. I already know of several places who planned on closing after they got through Christmas. When Barrycare kicks in it will get even worse.

Share This Page