Sign 25 (with reaches) or Undersign

Discussion in 'Awesome Recruiting' started by interrygator73, Feb 7, 2018.

  1. interrygator73

    interrygator73 GC Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2017
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    258
    Ratings Received:
    +197
    Some good brief discussion on other threads on the issue of trying to sign 25 with a bit of 2* & 3*, or keep slots open for higher ranked players next year. This issue deserves its own thread. There seem to be decent arguments on both sides with the new 25 max rule with no counting back.

    What say you Gator faithful? (knowledgeable rival posters minus trolls welcome ;))
  2. garettk

    garettk GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,209
    Likes Received:
    246
    Trophy Points:
    268
    Ratings Received:
    +2,351
    I would reach on one with qualifying issues and hope to get him in. But if they are unlikely to contribute during their time at UF, I’d save the spot.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Crusher

    Crusher GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,405
    Likes Received:
    180
    Trophy Points:
    373
    Ratings Received:
    +2,816
    Are we sure that this is the new rule? According to this http://www.gatorcountry.com/swampgas/threads/the-yearly-limit-question-settled.389251/ it may not be the case.

    Its pretty simple however, IMO:
    • Can count back previous year unused LOI's - save a few for next year if you can't get who you want
    • Can't count back previous year unused LOI's - use 25 every year and hope we grab an underrated kid or two who becomes a star.
  4. ETGator1

    ETGator1 GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    11,073
    Likes Received:
    150
    Trophy Points:
    513
    Ratings Received:
    +1,088
    I started a thread with the premise that there is no hard 25 limit. Too many programs have signed over 25 for the count back rule to not still be in existence. Based on same, there is no way I'd be making reaches for shaky 2 and 3 star players.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. interrygator73

    interrygator73 GC Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2017
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    258
    Ratings Received:
    +197
    Nope not sure Crusher. Liked your arguments buried in the LOI thread.

    Hope we don't have more than 3-4 to count back , if we can, as we need decent bodies now.
  6. 18walfu

    18walfu Best Fan In America VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2017
    Messages:
    19,795
    Likes Received:
    5,425
    Trophy Points:
    703
    Location:
    VIP room
    Ratings Received:
    +9,468
    Undersign.
  7. UFreak

    UFreak Premium Member Trusted GC Insider

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    6,086
    Likes Received:
    542
    Trophy Points:
    473
    Ratings Received:
    +4,955
    Undersign, especially in the transfer era. By the end of spring, there may be some good players looking for new homes.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. Claygator

    Claygator GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Messages:
    3,277
    Likes Received:
    208
    Trophy Points:
    313
    Ratings Received:
    +4,445
    And sit out a year.

    As for reaches, I don't know what Mullen and company have on the table. Shannon and Seider seemed to have been better connected in south florida to identify under the radar talent. I'm not sure Mullen has had the chance to make those connections.
  9. UFreak

    UFreak Premium Member Trusted GC Insider

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    6,086
    Likes Received:
    542
    Trophy Points:
    473
    Ratings Received:
    +4,955
    Yup, and sit out a year. But if you think about it, if you get a reach that reach will likely not play in his first year and likely redshirt by virtue of being a reach.

    It's the smart long-term play.
  10. theghost

    theghost GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2011
    Messages:
    3,972
    Likes Received:
    522
    Trophy Points:
    343
    Location:
    DC area
    Ratings Received:
    +5,576
    Unfortunately, we're not in a position to sign 25 so this question is hypothetical. I'm not sure about taking a "reach"....but I'm all in favor of taking Plan B's, especially if the staff has done their homework (and when I say "staff", I'm talking about the recruiting department - they should have a top 5 (or whatever) - and if they miss on the top 2 or 3....I see no problem offering the #4 or 5 guy on the list, if they think that kid is SEC caliber). But to "reach" on an FAU type kid? Nope, I'll hold the spot for the next cycle.
    • Agree Agree x 2
  11. themistocles

    themistocles VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    13,505
    Likes Received:
    534
    Trophy Points:
    583
    Ratings Received:
    +4,235
    Undersign.

    Skip the Reaches.
    • Agree Agree x 2
  12. tegator80

    tegator80 GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    6,051
    Likes Received:
    900
    Trophy Points:
    548
    Location:
    Richmond, VA
    Ratings Received:
    +8,441
    We can sign O-linemen who have a decent frame but aren't there yet. And we can sign slower safeties who can put on weight and become OLBers. Otherwise we need to strategize for the next year or two.
    • Like Like x 1
  13. g0ggles

    g0ggles GC Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2012
    Messages:
    188
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    158
    Ratings Received:
    +226
    Wouldn't be upset if the staff took 1 or 2 "projects".
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. Kerrdog

    Kerrdog GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2015
    Messages:
    1,391
    Likes Received:
    177
    Trophy Points:
    248
    Ratings Received:
    +1,147
    jeez, I though we had this all resolved. Is it 25 or 26? who counts back if anyone? what a cluster. I am going to ask Mullen to explain the numbers on his spring tour
  15. Crusher

    Crusher GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,405
    Likes Received:
    180
    Trophy Points:
    373
    Ratings Received:
    +2,816
    Would you "reach" on a UCF type kid, however?
  16. robertgator

    robertgator GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    474
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    238
    Ratings Received:
    +345
    we're ALWAYS below the 85 limit. I'd find 3 stars with smarts and heart and sign them up.
    • Agree Agree x 4
  17. interrygator73

    interrygator73 GC Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2017
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    258
    Ratings Received:
    +197
    Coach said in the presser that we would be below 25, but that was "part of the plan." NO ??? follow-ups. Gwad, I shoulda been a journalist.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. themistocles

    themistocles VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    13,505
    Likes Received:
    534
    Trophy Points:
    583
    Ratings Received:
    +4,235
    Yes, at the presser, Mullen made it infinitely clear that he was not going to make the mistakes that Zook constantly did and Meyer, the first year, of recruiting kids who can't compete in the SEC to fill Roster Spots.
  19. Kerrdog

    Kerrdog GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2015
    Messages:
    1,391
    Likes Received:
    177
    Trophy Points:
    248
    Ratings Received:
    +1,147
    Did he say compete or fit their system?
  20. theghost

    theghost GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2011
    Messages:
    3,972
    Likes Received:
    522
    Trophy Points:
    343
    Location:
    DC area
    Ratings Received:
    +5,576
    Honestly, it depends. I'd put UCF and USF above FAU and FIU in the talent they get (they usually have higher ranked recruiting classes). But this really depends on if the kid was scouting by our recruiting department. If he was on our board, but lower ranked, then sure....take a look and if he's worth an offer, go ahead. But this should be minimized, maybe 1 per class. Again, I think there's a difference in a Plan B and a "reach". Andrew Mike was a reach....Griffin McDowell was a Plan B.