Should their the more diversity of thought on this forum

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by Sohogator, Apr 25, 2014.

  1. ncgatr1
    Offline

    ncgatr1 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    4,723
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +309
    Archaic ideas like The Constitution? Left or left of center economic ideas don't work. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see to see the common denominator of failure associated with progressive economic policies. You can't take a European model of 60 million educated people and apply it to our economy. Now I would support a flat tax and limited government involvement in our economy, including getting rid of the special interest groups driven economy. That is the real issue here.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. uftaipan
    Online

    uftaipan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    3,889
    Likes Received:
    205
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Kabul, Afghanistan
    Ratings Received:
    +992
    Should there be an English requirement to start threads on this forum?
    • Funny Funny x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  3. MichiGator2002
    Online

    MichiGator2002 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    15,506
    Likes Received:
    402
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,662
    There it is. I crack up every time some mouthbreathing liberal politician, the President chief among them, talks about capitalism as a "failed model" or summat.

    Here's the score sheet on economic models --

    Capitalism -- pretty much exclusively invented the very idea of personal leisure, of social and economic mobility (there would never be phrases like "new money" without capitalism), and fostered almost all material prosperity available to mankind.

    Every other system combined -- none of that

    Systems premised on the values articulated by Marx -- wellsprings of human misery and destitution. 100 million dead bodies to squelch objection or resistance to wellsprings of human misery and destitution.

    Failed model? Only model that's ever been worth a damn.
  4. orangeblueorangeblue
    Online

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    56,397
    Likes Received:
    555
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,466
    Their should definitely the more diversity of thought.
  5. 108
    Online

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    17,554
    Likes Received:
    273
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,028
    Sports fans tend to be right leaning

    This has been researched
  6. 108
    Online

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    17,554
    Likes Received:
    273
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,028
    See Michi post for an example
  7. RealGatorFan
    Offline

    RealGatorFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    13,025
    Likes Received:
    99
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +432
    fred, river, nana are not right by any means.
  8. RealGatorFan
    Offline

    RealGatorFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    13,025
    Likes Received:
    99
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +432
    No country survived using progressive or left-of-center economics. Not a one. Some countries failed 2 or 3 times trying to prove it works. Unfortunately, the US will be another country to fall victim to government interference.
  9. chemgator
    Offline

    chemgator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    8,235
    Likes Received:
    186
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +784
    If the U.S. continues to lean left, there is a high likelihood that the U.S. will be on the losing end of World War III in a few short decades. China plans to confront the U.S. militarily within 30 years, and they plan on winning. Russia will probably wipe the floor with whoever survives that battle. Expect a quick surrender by an ultra-liberal president.

    You are already seeing nations challenge the U.S. indirectly. China laid claims on several islands that are claimed by other countries, to see how far they can push their luck and bully those other nations. Syria inspired Obama to draw a red line in the sand, and then admit that he didn't know what a red line in the sand was when Syria crossed it. Russia claims ownership of the Arctic Circle and is willing to have a pseudo-military invasion of the Ukraine. The only one of these actions that occurred under GWB was Russia and the Arctic, and that was because the Arctic wasn't going to complain. We have a weak president, and other countries know this. They also know that Europe has been lulled to sleep by socialism. Europeans don't have the energy or moral fiber to stand up to Russia. Facing the prospect of dealing with a cold winter without Russian gas would be just too horrifying for them.

    China and Russia won't directly challenge the U.S. militarily while the U.S. still has a strong military. They will wait a few decades for the U.S. to weaken economically, as more liberal policies take effect. They will bide their time and look for opportunities to upgrade their own military capabilities (develop stealth aircraft, etc.) while the U.S. slowly goes to sleep like Europe did.
  10. TheRaid
    Offline

    TheRaid VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,518
    Likes Received:
    281
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Fairhope, AL (Mobile/Pensacola Area)
    Ratings Received:
    +579
    I have not seen much progressive thought from the left on here. I have seen a lot of regressive from the left, though.

    Joking aside, we have seen a lot of Marx progressivism on the boards. But, you did not define which progressive thought you are advocating. For example are you advocating progressivism of Woodrow Wilson and TR, or are you advocating the progressivism of Kant, or even Hegel? What is it you are after?

    It seems to me that depending on which brand of progressivism you advocate, you might consider it a compliment to be called a socialist or a Marxist if you truly understood the progressivism you are advocating.
    Last edited: Apr 29, 2014
    • Funny Funny x 1

Share This Page