Seattle purposely avoids placing sugar tax on Starbucks lefties

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by gator_fever, Jan 11, 2018.

  1. gator_fever
    Offline

    gator_fever GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2013
    Messages:
    2,711
    Likes Received:
    290
    Trophy Points:
    288
    Ratings Received:
    +4,473
    https://conservativetribune.com/democrats-liberal-exemption/

    Seattle’s leftists lawmakers approved an ordinance last year that imposed a tax on all sweetened beverages, save of course for the lattes consumed by the city’s highfalutin, upper-class elites.

    The new tax, which went into effect Jan. 1, specifically added a tax on “sweetened beverages, syrups and concentrates” except for those “that list milk as their first ingredient,” according to The Seattle Times.

    This means the fancy lattes enjoyed by Seattle’s Starbucks-sipping liberals get a pass, despite the fact that some of these lattes contain up to 68 grams of sugar.

    “Where and when is a sweetened beverage not a taxable sweetened beverage? In Seattle, when the drink is a Caramel Macchiato from Starbucks — 42 grams of sugar in a Venti, the largest size. Or a Caramel Brulée Latte with whipped cream — 68 grams of sugar in a Venti,” the Times explained.

    -----------------------------------

    It figures the crazed lefty elites would exclude most of their purchases of sugary drinks.
    • Informative Informative x 2
  2. docspor
    Offline

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2010
    Messages:
    1,351
    Likes Received:
    347
    Trophy Points:
    303
    Ratings Received:
    +2,036
    I was just on the horn with my boys in Bern. They will get a kick out of this. I always told 'em this Swiss fav would never fly in the states, but this may be it's chance. First ingredient water, but milk is 2nd at 35%.

    [​IMG]
    • Informative Informative x 1
  3. mdgator05
    Offline

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2010
    Messages:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    478
    Trophy Points:
    328
    Ratings Received:
    +7,018
    You think the "highfalutin, upper-class elites" in Seattle are frequenting Starbucks above their local coffee shops? Yeah, no...
  4. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    57,754
    Likes Received:
    8,145
    Trophy Points:
    2,318
    Ratings Received:
    +33,514
    If this is the case than that "law" does not apply equally to all businesses, and should be un-Constitutional.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. mdgator05
    Offline

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2010
    Messages:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    478
    Trophy Points:
    328
    Ratings Received:
    +7,018
    Yeah, that is not true either. The law against marijuana is not unconstitutional because we allow people to smoke other substances legally (like tobacco). They listed a specific exception based upon ingredients. Pepsi bottles Frappacinos which would also be exempted under this law and wouldn't be subject to the tax and sodas that are. You can argue that the law is stupid or designed to benefit a particular special interest, but it is not unconstitutional.
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  6. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    57,754
    Likes Received:
    8,145
    Trophy Points:
    2,318
    Ratings Received:
    +33,514
    Total non sequester...
    • Funny Funny x 1
  7. gator_fever
    Offline

    gator_fever GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2013
    Messages:
    2,711
    Likes Received:
    290
    Trophy Points:
    288
    Ratings Received:
    +4,473
    I think the locals have a lot of freedom on stuff like this however. I am trying to remember why NYC's big soda ban was struck down. It might have been because it was based on the size of the soda and wasn't a tax.
  8. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    57,754
    Likes Received:
    8,145
    Trophy Points:
    2,318
    Ratings Received:
    +33,514
    Sugar tax some but not others would/should go all the way to the Supreme Court, IMHO. It's totally un-equal...
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. mdgator05
    Offline

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2010
    Messages:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    478
    Trophy Points:
    328
    Ratings Received:
    +7,018
    It is simply not unconstitutional to write a law involving an ingredient that one company uses and another one doesn't.
  10. tilly
    Offline

    tilly Superhero Moderator with bulletproof posts! VIP Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    30,703
    Likes Received:
    5,138
    Trophy Points:
    1,768
    Location:
    Floridian by Birth, Now in beautiful coastal, NC.
    Ratings Received:
    +32,603
    OK. I am far from a lefty, But McDonalds likely sells more sugary drinks than most anywhere, and they would benefit too. This is not an elite issue. McD's McCafe menu is very similar to big coffee chains IRT it's sugar/dairy content
  11. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    57,754
    Likes Received:
    8,145
    Trophy Points:
    2,318
    Ratings Received:
    +33,514
    What about taxing some that use that ingredient (Sugar) but not others...
  12. mdgator05
    Offline

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2010
    Messages:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    478
    Trophy Points:
    328
    Ratings Received:
    +7,018
    If you have an exception based on a different ingredient, then no.
  13. docspor
    Offline

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2010
    Messages:
    1,351
    Likes Received:
    347
    Trophy Points:
    303
    Ratings Received:
    +2,036
    I don't see how this would be ruled unconstitutional. Isn't alcohol usually taxed differently depending on whether it's beer, wine or booze? & in many places where it is sold, bar vs. store.

    The arg could be that these are diff products. I doubt they've ever made it a secret that it is sodas they are after. They'd run into trouble if they taxed coke & not pepsi.
  14. homer
    Offline

    homer GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2015
    Messages:
    907
    Likes Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    258
    Ratings Received:
    +2,754
    Silly progressives
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. gator_fever
    Offline

    gator_fever GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2013
    Messages:
    2,711
    Likes Received:
    290
    Trophy Points:
    288
    Ratings Received:
    +4,473
    I am sure McDonalds sales were being thought of in Seattle with that exception.

    What about a McDonalds soda loaded with ice - how is that being taxed?
  16. gator_fever
    Offline

    gator_fever GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2013
    Messages:
    2,711
    Likes Received:
    290
    Trophy Points:
    288
    Ratings Received:
    +4,473
    Unfortunately the law allows progressives to force mess like this on others.

    The 9th Circuit probably would have tried to claim a ban like NYC's attempted ban on large sodas was legal also with the crazies on that appeals court.
  17. fastsix
    Offline

    fastsix Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Messages:
    9,358
    Likes Received:
    719
    Trophy Points:
    643
    Location:
    Seattle
    Ratings Received:
    +12,143
    The tax is on how much finished product the concentrate would make. McDonalds would pay the tax before you ever got the drink.
  18. danmann65
    Offline

    danmann65 GC Legend

    Joined:
    May 22, 2015
    Messages:
    1,480
    Likes Received:
    154
    Trophy Points:
    248
    Ratings Received:
    +1,060
    But they are drinking candy coffee wherever they go. When I just get a coffee which rarely happens I go to a local place called campus grounds. What the stetson students drink I suspect is less healthy for you than a jolt cola but what do I know.
  19. tilly
    Offline

    tilly Superhero Moderator with bulletproof posts! VIP Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    30,703
    Likes Received:
    5,138
    Trophy Points:
    1,768
    Location:
    Floridian by Birth, Now in beautiful coastal, NC.
    Ratings Received:
    +32,603
    My guess is you are unaware of how much McCafe generates, but I tend to agree with you, that often this is a leftist way. But in this case, I don't think this was about Starbucks.
  20. JerseyGator01
    Offline

    JerseyGator01 GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    15,645
    Likes Received:
    274
    Trophy Points:
    518
    Ratings Received:
    +3,036
    I am Howard Schultz and I approved this tax.

    CORRUPTION RULES!!!!!

Share This Page