Reducing the deficit

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by wgbgator, Nov 13, 2013.

  1. wgbgator

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    22,902
    Likes Received:
    388
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Nothing really controversial here, just for general interest, the CBO released a list of savings 2014-23 on all manner of proposed ideas. How much will your favorite pet idea save?

    http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/44715-SummaryTableofOptions.pdf

    Biggest calculated savings on the list:

    Obviously, you probably wouldnt want to do this without some offset in tax cuts elsewhere.
  2. wygator

    wygator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    6,304
    Likes Received:
    269
    Trophy Points:
    83
    How is a major tax a "savings"? Saving for who?
  3. wgbgator

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    22,902
    Likes Received:
    388
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Savings for the Fed gov't budget deficit, obviously. If you can deficit "spend" then you can also "save." Bringing in revenue without increasing spending would reduce the deficit, i.e. "save." Just like cutting taxes would increase it (i.e. "spend") if you didnt offset it in equal or greater cuts in spending.
  4. mocgator

    mocgator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,368
    Likes Received:
    282
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The ATL
    What a twisted world liberals live in. Truly Bizarro world.

    Where tax is revenue, a cut in the growth of spending is savings, and an imaginary increase in taxes is a saving in spending.

    Bizarro World.

    I do have a stupid idea worth a thought... how about we cut spending. 2/3 of our budget being straight transfer payments from one American who earned it to another that didn't might be a place to start.

    I know... a crazy idea.
  5. TJtheGator

    TJtheGator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,854
    Likes Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Winter Springs, FL
    For liberals, tax= savings in the amount we propose to borrow, but nothing towards reducing existing debt.

    Liberals were never very good at math or economics.
  6. wgbgator

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    22,902
    Likes Received:
    388
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    If you actually look at the list there are a myriad of options from cuts/caps in spending to taxes, all presented as "savings" to the deficit. Bizarre stuff, I know. :roll:
  7. MichaelJoeWilliamson

    MichaelJoeWilliamson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Messages:
    6,820
    Likes Received:
    415
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Save means not spend.

    Orwell was right
  8. wgbgator

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    22,902
    Likes Received:
    388
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Maybe all you guys should take up the semantics of deficit reduction with the CBO, then.
  9. mocgator

    mocgator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,368
    Likes Received:
    282
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The ATL
    Oh to be given the chance....
  10. MichaelJoeWilliamson

    MichaelJoeWilliamson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Messages:
    6,820
    Likes Received:
    415
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Indeed.

    Yet you defend that incorrect use.

    I imagine you have replaced "new taxes" with "new revenue" in your lexicon too?

Share This Page