Yep. Jurists of all stripes now making sure they'll still be toasted at all the right social events. Follow the crowd at chow time. Oh, as a constitutional matter? Complete pants, especially the tiddlywinks played with the types of scrutiny to avoid wanton misfeasance. Guess it is a good thing we have a living reanimated undead Constitution that can just mean whatever the hell it has to that day. Will Michigan birth certificates now get to join those other states in making a de jure fact our of an absolute metaphysical and biological impossibility? Probably. Does listing parents on a birth certificate serve any independent, self-explanatory purpose anymore? Not really, but in fairness that has been in drift for a while as a result of the dependent legal significance it has, particularly for men. Why is it always that courts come down on the lack of study that there is any social good advanced by a heteronormative family structure, but don't require any empirical data whatsoever by which to treat sexual orientation as being any more legally significant than any other sexual fetish or preference between consenting adults? Because all they are doing is contriving a legal rationale for a preferred outcome.