Ratings

Discussion in 'Awesome Recruiting' started by twodaparty, Feb 7, 2018.

  1. twodaparty

    twodaparty GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    15,207
    Likes Received:
    442
    Trophy Points:
    583
    Ratings Received:
    +2,724
    Average star ratings? Where do we stand with and without transfers factored in for this class? Also, what will our “#13 ESPN” recruiting rank that is being advertised go up to if we get the Gerald who is announcing tomorrow?
  2. twodaparty

    twodaparty GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    15,207
    Likes Received:
    442
    Trophy Points:
    583
    Ratings Received:
    +2,724
    If any recruitnik stat cruncher can provide this data I would appreciate it. Trying to show a leg humper friend that our class was actually top 10 in a transition year when you factor in the stud transfers Mullen recruited.
  3. Skink

    Skink GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2014
    Messages:
    3,759
    Likes Received:
    1,134
    Trophy Points:
    543
    Location:
    Mason's Inlet, North Carolina
    Ratings Received:
    +12,795
    Arguing with a leghumper today is an exercise in futility. This is their day - I’d steer clear of them
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. Todesrolle

    Todesrolle GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    4,668
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    188
    Location:
    Calibishie, Dominica. Sometimes SC, NC, or FLA
    Ratings Received:
    +867
    I'd rather do the opposite: Convince them that our recruiting class sucks, and then go out and beat them with our suckky recruits.
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Notoriousgator

    Notoriousgator GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    5,009
    Likes Received:
    1,179
    Trophy Points:
    483
    Ratings Received:
    +7,555
    2018 Avg Star Ratings

    1. OSU. 94.29* 26 signees
    2. UGA. 94.23* 26
    3. USC. 94.23* 18
    4. CLEM 93.45* 17
    5. BAMA 92.78* 19
    6. PSU. 91.70* 23
    7. OKL. 91.31* 22
    8. MIAMI 90.99* 23
    9. FSU. 90.91* 21
    10. UF. 90.69* 19
    11.WASH 90.41* 21
    12. AUB 90.20* 24
    13. LSU. 90.11* 22

    By adding Van Jefferson and Trevon Grimes I used their rankings from 247 during their SR year. I came up with 91.25 which would put us just behind Oklahoma. (I can Hardly keep my eyes open so I'm struggling with the smallest tasks!! Lol)

    I didn't add Gerald though.
    • Like Like x 2
    • Informative Informative x 2
  6. Notoriousgator

    Notoriousgator GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    5,009
    Likes Received:
    1,179
    Trophy Points:
    483
    Ratings Received:
    +7,555
    If I subtract Russell and add Gerald (along with the 2 tranfers) were at 91.28. Not much of a difference .
  7. Crusher

    Crusher GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,399
    Likes Received:
    179
    Trophy Points:
    373
    Ratings Received:
    +2,810
    None....these sites quit doing anthing the minute signing day is over. That is why it doesn't matter when FSU have 4 or 5 of their signees not qualify and make it into school every year.
  8. grant1

    grant1 GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,587
    Likes Received:
    151
    Trophy Points:
    238
    Ratings Received:
    +2,256
    If we get Gerald I do not believe they will change the rankings. They are done, no changes.

    I remember when Urb was here, USC was first in 1 ranking based on commitments on signing day, we were 2nd. a couple of USC commits went elsewhere after signing day, no changes made.
  9. kryptonite

    kryptonite GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2008
    Messages:
    751
    Likes Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    163
    Ratings Received:
    +526
    I'm not sure that is the case with ESPN, but it certainly is not with 247 or rivals. You might remember that Cece did not commit or sign on signing day for us and was included in our class for rankings.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. bposs

    bposs GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2010
    Messages:
    1,669
    Likes Received:
    199
    Trophy Points:
    128
    Location:
    Apopka
    Ratings Received:
    +2,664
    Agreed, try to shift the focus to baseball!
  11. Wanne15

    Wanne15 GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2015
    Messages:
    1,784
    Likes Received:
    302
    Trophy Points:
    128
    Ratings Received:
    +2,588
    Dunlap and Delance will be with us this year too for the first time.
  12. Notoriousgator

    Notoriousgator GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    5,009
    Likes Received:
    1,179
    Trophy Points:
    483
    Ratings Received:
    +7,555
    Yeah, they've been on campus for awhile so I didn't include them. That and I'm too lazy.
    • Like Like x 1
  13. UFreak

    UFreak Premium Member Trusted GC Insider

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    6,085
    Likes Received:
    538
    Trophy Points:
    473
    Ratings Received:
    +4,949
    Yes, but they technically came on the roster before fall practice in 2017. If you wanted to include them as part of recruiting, it would be more appropriate for them to be added to the rankings of the 2017 class.
    • Agree Agree x 2
  14. Notoriousgator

    Notoriousgator GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    5,009
    Likes Received:
    1,179
    Trophy Points:
    483
    Ratings Received:
    +7,555
    It barely affects our overall total anyway. He's only ranked higher than Russell by a slim margin.
  15. UFreak

    UFreak Premium Member Trusted GC Insider

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    6,085
    Likes Received:
    538
    Trophy Points:
    473
    Ratings Received:
    +4,949
    You weren't being lazy at all. You did it the right way. Delance and Dunlap in no way should be counted in this class. They were on football scholarship starting in the fall of 2017.
    • Agree Agree x 4
  16. Wanne15

    Wanne15 GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2015
    Messages:
    1,784
    Likes Received:
    302
    Trophy Points:
    128
    Ratings Received:
    +2,588
    They did sign 17 but they were not part of the team. As far as players on the field they are new to us this year just like the new recruits though
  17. RealGatorFan

    RealGatorFan Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    13,778
    Likes Received:
    400
    Trophy Points:
    608
    Ratings Received:
    +4,743
    Wouldn't you?? Georgia signed 7, yes 7, 5 star players and another 15 4 stars. That's the best NSD ever and yeah I would be gloating here in Birmingham if our Gators came away with that haul.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. UFreak

    UFreak Premium Member Trusted GC Insider

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    6,085
    Likes Received:
    538
    Trophy Points:
    473
    Ratings Received:
    +4,949
    I hear you, but we are talking about recruiting. They were recruited and signed their scholarship papers before the fall of 2017. So if you were to count them for recruiting purposes, you would count them in the 2017 class.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. theghost

    theghost GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2011
    Messages:
    3,965
    Likes Received:
    520
    Trophy Points:
    343
    Location:
    DC area
    Ratings Received:
    +5,570
    No, @Notoriousgator is right....he's lazy!! :D
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  20. Wanne15

    Wanne15 GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2015
    Messages:
    1,784
    Likes Received:
    302
    Trophy Points:
    128
    Ratings Received:
    +2,588
    I understand and I totally agree. But I'm looking at is quality football players that can be put on the field. The talent we add may be more than what our recruiting ranking says