PrezBO considering Executive order to raise minimum wage

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by g8orbill, Jan 17, 2014.

  1. g8orbill
    Offline

    g8orbill Gators VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    71,239
    Likes Received:
    4,623
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Clermont, Fl
    Ratings Received:
    +9,731
  2. MichiGator2002
    Online

    MichiGator2002 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    16,165
    Likes Received:
    493
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +2,302
    Is this the one where he gives up even the pretense of executing existing legislation altogether?

    Problem is, who would stop him, if we are waiting on GOP party leadership to risk being called racist and obstructionist by suing to prevent it?
  3. wgbgator
    Offline

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    23,153
    Likes Received:
    405
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,698
    I'd say that headline is a bit overstated given the content of the article.
  4. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    "for federal contractors" is a pretty huge part of the story.
  5. MichiGator2002
    Online

    MichiGator2002 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    16,165
    Likes Received:
    493
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +2,302
    Well, at least that would probably pass the smell test for legality. It is idiotic policy of course, and just more demonstrated willingness to throw taxpayer money around like a mogul and like it was actually his.
  6. mocgator
    Offline

    mocgator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,422
    Likes Received:
    300
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The ATL
    Ratings Received:
    +617
    I'm 100% confident they've had the discussion. How could you possibly think otherwise? We are living in a post Constitutional America.
  7. wgbgator
    Offline

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    23,153
    Likes Received:
    405
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,698
    The discussion of raising the minimum wage for federal contractors? Yeah, the article seems to indicate that.
  8. DaveFla
    Offline

    DaveFla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    18,380
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +979
    The story here is obviously the use of the EO, thereby circumventing the legislative process, NOT about the minimum wage or government contractors...

    I bet you guys are a hoot to watch when an illusionist gets your attention...
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. wgbgator
    Offline

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    23,153
    Likes Received:
    405
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,698
    Does the "legislative process" determine the compensation rates or adjustments thereof for federal contractors? Serious question, because I dont know the answer there.
  10. DaveFla
    Offline

    DaveFla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    18,380
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +979
    I don't know either, but I would bet that the president alone can not determine the who and how much for federal contractors...
  11. wgbgator
    Offline

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    23,153
    Likes Received:
    405
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,698
    I think you'd want to know before you go around talking about "circumventing the legislative process." That's just me though.
  12. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    Probably not, but if you really think about it, this is essentially direct stimulus. After all, who's paying the difference in wage for these people?
  13. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    It's more likely that the federal government would no longer grant contracts to businesses that did not offer that wage, rather than dictating these X companies must pay Y in minimum wage.

    Price of admission, so to speak.
  14. DaveFla
    Offline

    DaveFla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    18,380
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +979
    Didn't stop you before...
  15. cjgator76
    Online

    cjgator76 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    17,253
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +426
    There are a number of statutes on the subject. I'm no expert, but I think that they all tie contractor wage payment requirements to the "prevailing wage" as determined by the DOL. So Congress doesn't specify a number, but rather an administrative method for arriving at a number.

    I doubt that there is any precedent for a POTUS picking a number out of the air and decreeing "contractors must pay this amount"or "contractors will lose preference points if they don't pay this amount." If such precedent existed I would think that Obama would have issued an EO on the subject long before now.

    Some of the statutes are mentioned in this dol.gov summary:

  16. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    It looks like McNamara states that they must pay the minimum wage set by either locality or the collective bargaining agreement, which would obviously yield to whatever the fed required.
  17. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    As part of the public notice:

  18. channingcrowderhungry
    Online

    channingcrowderhungry Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    4,934
    Likes Received:
    190
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Ratings Received:
    +824
    Which would raise these businesses costs for any non-government project they also bid on, as their cost of labor would be higher than a business not dealing with government contracts. Basically, more government intervention in business, more government creating winners and losers through inane "legislation.".
  19. Bushmaster
    Offline

    Bushmaster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    2,950
    Likes Received:
    169
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +778
    The Davis Bacon Act already sets minimum wages for ANY worker who works on a contract awarded by the federal government.

    If you have a government contract subjected to Davis Bacon, you WILL pay what they tell you to pay. That payroll has to be certified and is subject to audit.
  20. cjgator76
    Online

    cjgator76 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    17,253
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +426
    The issue seems to be whether, notwithstanding the current statutory framework, POTUS has the authority to bypass the existing wage determination procedures and decide "what the fed requires."

Share This Page