Pissed me off!

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by Gatormb, Dec 19, 2013.

  1. CHFG8R

    CHFG8R Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    6,713
    Likes Received:
    309
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    St. Augustine, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,344
    Star Trek?

    I guess that was kinda Communist?
  2. wgbgator

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    23,116
    Likes Received:
    403
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,676
    I don't think a "post-scarcity" society is necessarily a communist one.
  3. CHFG8R

    CHFG8R Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    6,713
    Likes Received:
    309
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    St. Augustine, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,344
    Not "C" but I'm thinking Star Trek society (at least in the Federation) was certainly "c."

    Wow, I'm such a dork!
  4. jaxgator1991

    jaxgator1991 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2013
    Messages:
    1,125
    Likes Received:
    151
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Jacksonville Beach
    Ratings Received:
    +550
    whoa whoa whoa man. i am all for paying my fair share of taxes to pay the courageous people of our armed forces/fire fighters/police services. also i do think that their are some people who do need our help, now if they took drug tests, were only allowed to stay on food stamps/ unemployment for 3 months, then maybe i would be less pissed off about this. its the culture that has been created by letting these bums stay on these benefits for month after month after month that is very scary they are getting money and have no clue where it is coming from, while i go to work and bust my ass. its just not right, plain and simple
  5. CHFG8R

    CHFG8R Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    6,713
    Likes Received:
    309
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    St. Augustine, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,344

    I agree. Reforms are called for. I was speaking more generally on the subject of welfare in general and whether it's necessary or not. Let's put it this way, Louis the XVI was probably wishing (as he was led to the guillotine) he had a better welfare system in place.
    • Funny Funny x 1
  6. harwil

    harwil Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,768
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +145
    Nixon and his HEW chief Finch were playing with the idea in his interrupted second term.
  7. wgbgator

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    23,116
    Likes Received:
    403
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,676
    You could also call it a triumph of the Enlightment - the victory of reason & science over the ills of humanity - war, scarcity, etc. I suppose its left-ish in its view of the spirit of internationalism, common humanity and progress to overcome nationalism and conflict.
  8. busigator96

    busigator96 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    14,719
    Likes Received:
    216
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Gainesville, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +808
    The real intent of entitlements from a spending perspective is just allowing a train to take another track for a certain stretch of time. Like wgb said, it is just a part of aggrigate demand and then will create a ripple effect for the rest of the economy.

    All money today is born out of debt (public or private). It even says so on the bill.
  9. busigator96

    busigator96 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    14,719
    Likes Received:
    216
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Gainesville, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +808
    Nope, no money, just the prime directive.
  10. Spurffelbow833

    Spurffelbow833 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    9,500
    Likes Received:
    418
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,803
  11. gatorplank

    gatorplank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,194
    Likes Received:
    113
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +405
    It is my concern when democrats will point to those same people and say that greedy capitalists are the reason that they find themselves in that condition. Then democrats will try to redistribute more hand-outs and they'll waste that too. There should be limitations on how people get to spend their handouts.
  12. agigator

    agigator Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    1,185
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Ratings Received:
    +76
    There's already limitations but the government really only enforces the limitations when it's expedient. Same as with things like immigration, the war on drugs, campaign finance reform, etc.
  13. The_Graygator

    The_Graygator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Messages:
    35,615
    Likes Received:
    566
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,145
    Just another way that liberals use hard-working American taxpayers' money to buy votes from lazy dead beats who want to live off the govt.
  14. chompalot

    chompalot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,098
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +361
    Those who don't need it would just bank the savings.
  15. ufdocco

    ufdocco Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2013
    Messages:
    668
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Greeley, CO
    Ratings Received:
    +401
    That's probably central to their strategy to become "Those who don't need it".
  16. Gatormb

    Gatormb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    8,943
    Likes Received:
    284
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Bradenton, Fl
    Ratings Received:
    +867
    He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name. This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666.

Share This Page