For the life of me, I don't know why this is so difficult for some to grant. If Walker comes out in an interview and says he was lazy, didn't do his homework, would rather play video games, ignored his teachers and counselors because they were bothersome, or something along those lines, then we could all see clearly what the problem was. But until said time, we are basically reading our preconceived notions about what may or may not have led him to (potentially!) not qualify. And for what? So we can lecture the board about the value of hard work? Or just to belittle Walker? Oh, the irony that anonymous posters wasting their time on message boards have the temerity to lecture a a high schooler they don't know about the value of hard work.