Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by Gatormb, Dec 18, 2013.
You don't have a single clue as to what you are talking about. You make a perfect Foxbot.
If I called you lazy, would you infer that I thought you were black?
Because that's about how your idiotic 'book of racism' works.
Talk about ridiculous.
The neo-libbies in this thread have just lost their collective freak'n marbles.
Every last one of y'all post'n in this thread.
Learn it; live it; love it....y'all's hero and messiah, is a
Aha, you can relate to Bush after all.
No, I would simply infer from these strained arguments and past ridiculous claims that you are not worth talking to. I mean you are the guy that predicted a Romney landslide, right? You do have a tendency to be massively wrong about baseless claims.
Sure, there are aspects that they all dislike. The difference with Obama, if the reports are believed, is that he doesn't even care for dealing with his own party in Congress.
Getting downright catty there, WGB. Tender nerve indeed....(lmao!)
Sure, that was me that predicted a landslide for mitty--for over a year, never waivered. Guess my faith in our nation's collective intelligence, was misplaced--though I think maybe I was just a few months premature on the fraud occuppying the WH being exposed--had the election been held today, I suspect my prediction may very well have been vindicated...
BTW...did I mention that Barry is a lazy ass!
It's really no secret the President is lazy, but now lazy is code for racism. Awesome.
Got to love the way these things work. Alinsyites at their best.
And THIS thoughtful analysis and insight coming from the one "claiming Hussein is the best president in his lifetime"...... That aspect alone most surely adds credibility beyond words.
Found this little jewel
You don't have to look any further than Bill Clinton to see a president who was constantly engaged in policy details (when not chasing skirts) in both terms. Clinton was not lazy or disengaged. Yes, every president slows down a bit in their second term--it's an extremely stressful job that wears people out. The hope usually is that policies enacted in the first term have the momentum to carry themselves forward into the second term. Obama was lazy and disengaged from the very beginning. Millions of people were out of a job when he started, and all he had the energy for was to push Obamacare as the only option to prevent future economic collapse. No leadership.
Obama ran for a second term because his ego wouldn't let him stop after one term. He wouldn't want to be known as a 1-term president, and he wouldn't want the next president to either undo Obamacare or to significantly change it and allow it to become Romneycare or Hillarycare.
Ummm, where is your contrary evidence?
Reading a report and not asking questions IS lazy. Doing it by e-mail is inefficient. You are assuming that Obama came to a full understanding of each memo and had no further questions. To do that, he would have to be an expert in whatever field the writer was coming from and the documents would have to be perfectly written. Are you really simple-minded enough to believe that? He would also have to assume that the writer had no personal bias, took no short-cuts in his research, and fully expressed his level of confidence in his sources of information. That is why presidents have meetings, not to have the memos read to them. If you are going to take action on something, you better have a complete understanding of what you're being told. CEO's and other leaders of large organizations have a schedule full of meetings every day for this exact reason.
Yes, because he didn't feel the need for a daily briefing like My Pet Goat boy, that means he NEVER discussed NATSEC issues with anyone else.
Please, please, please turn off Fox while there are some remaining brain cells.
^^^Don't be obtuse. Barry doesn't meet with them, so he won't be exposed for his stupidity, or at least for not having prepared for meeting with them, not having read their emails, or not understanding what's in them, even if he did deign to read them.
Yet again, the neo-libbies just gratuitiously impute 'genius' to this clown out of thin air, with zero basis......ah but what's reallly funny about this thread, is that just a small sampling of the 'W.' treatment, and they go into nuclear meltdown.
I don't watch Fox news. It must be difficult being a simpleton who constantly assumes things about other people.
Any time a president does something related to policy that is completely different from every other president before him, it makes sense to question whether he is doing something brilliant, something unusual, or something foolish. Being a little (or a lot) less informed than his predecessors pretty much rules out the brilliant option.
Again, the only recent prez who differed on NATSEC briefings was GWB. Before and after him, this information was delivered in printed format.
Any other spin on the meetings is just Breitbart-land garbage.