Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by diehardgator1, Aug 26, 2013.
Oh, yeah, you're going to get that just by asking for it. :roll:
Seriously dad?....asking fred????.....for details???? :laugh::laugh::laugh:
Fred's a pasta chef... constantly throwing :shhh:it against the wall to see if it sticks.
If Muschamp had one his assistants give PED to his players, is Muschamp guilty? That's what this was about if you read the article. Obama kept his hands clean by using a commission to do the dirty work for him. Presidents do this.
It's a commission that doesn't report to the President, and the President doesn't have removal authority over.
Is Muschamp guilty if some guy he once wrote a letter of recommendation for, but he isn't allowed to direct and can't legally get rid of even if he wants to, gives PEDs to players? That's a better analogy.
If the NSA program hadn't been created, this would be no issue.
So, Obama has free reign to amplify or abuse any prior existing program, and it will always be the fault of whoever put it there for him to expand and abuse?
That is what responsibility means when it comes to the conduct of children, that you can't leave knives laying around, a pool intended, etc, because kids don't know how to act. That is the standard that applies to Obama?
Whether it is CBS, MNBC, Fox, or some other news agency we should all be concerned when they take what is said and misrepresent it. That is one of the reasons I don't watch news on TV. Not to say what you read on the Internet is always the gospel but I do try to pick and choose followed by research if it seems to be needed.