Nuclear option? Go ahead, Reid. Make our day.

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by MastaG8r, Jul 11, 2013.

  1. MastaG8r
    Offline

    MastaG8r New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,039
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    305, USA
    Ratings Received:
    +44
    I say go for it, Dems. Simple majority. Let's do it like that from now on.

    Dare you.
  2. gregthegator
    Offline

    gregthegator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    2,589
    Likes Received:
    116
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +441
    the dog & pony or smoke & mirrors show has gotten you EXCITED...calm down...in the end...they'll vote for their BEST interest together...you & I be damned...:sick:
  3. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    35,046
    Likes Received:
    2,841
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +6,038
    The Dems will cheat in every which way they can to steal a vote or to get an appointee nominated. If the system blocks them legally they tray and change the system to ram through their enslavement agenda proponent.
  4. Row6
    Offline

    Row6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +26
    We agree. Let's do it. The president should be able to nominate officers in his administration without a super majority. Who disagree s with that?
  5. MastaG8r
    Offline

    MastaG8r New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,039
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    305, USA
    Ratings Received:
    +44
    Not me. And I won't change my mind in about 2 1/2 years, either. But I bet you will. :bored:
  6. Row6
    Offline

    Row6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +26
    No, I won't change my mind when Hillary's elected but even if you guys win the v presidency again - after going 1 for 6 in the popular vote - I'll still support not requiring super majority's for confirming executive branch appointments.

    Now, what's your excuse for favoring that ridiculous idea?
  7. altalias
    Offline

    altalias Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2008
    Messages:
    1,349
    Likes Received:
    264
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +267
    Harry Reid did when the pubs were in charge.
  8. Row6
    Offline

    Row6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +26
    Look at the scoreboard. Since the republicans lost the Senate in 2006 frequency of holds and filibusters have double and triple previous years. The losers are trying to run the country.
  9. Row6
    Offline

    Row6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +26
    c'mon Harry - make masta's and my day!!
  10. g8rjd
    Offline

    g8rjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    7,255
    Likes Received:
    266
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Tallahassee, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +404
    Have to admit, the 60 vote requirement is hardly democratic.
  11. GatorNorth
    Offline

    GatorNorth Premium Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    10,222
    Likes Received:
    384
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Ratings Received:
    +1,425
    No more so than imposing the "Hastert Rule" in the house. Both sides are dysfunctional regardless of the majority party. It's nauseating to watch our elected officials try to not govern this country.
  12. MastaG8r
    Offline

    MastaG8r New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,039
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    305, USA
    Ratings Received:
    +44
    I'm confused...you favor what you regard as a ridiculous idea?
  13. dangolegators
    Offline

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,875
    Likes Received:
    129
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +887
    Sounds like this is what everyone wants. So good, let's do it.
  14. MastaG8r
    Offline

    MastaG8r New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,039
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    305, USA
    Ratings Received:
    +44
    ^^ Another one who was no doubt singing a different tune (just like Dirty Harry was) when the shoe was on the other foot, and will go right back to singing that old tune again the next time a Republican's in office with a slim GOP majority.
  15. JerseyGator01
    Offline

    JerseyGator01 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    15,482
    Likes Received:
    179
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +804
    Fat white lawyers Reid and the word "leadership" should never be mentioned in the same sentence.

    CORRUPTION RULES!!!!!
  16. dadx4
    Online

    dadx4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    30,167
    Likes Received:
    707
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Gainesville, Fl
    Ratings Received:
    +2,080
    If Reid is not a dead man walking I don't know what is. You liberals would be going nuts if the pubs did this.
  17. fredsanford
    Online

    fredsanford VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    12,350
    Likes Received:
    232
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +1,702
    Nope. 60 votes for everything is ludicrous. And it's the pubs obstructionism that forced this.
  18. MastaG8r
    Offline

    MastaG8r New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,039
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    305, USA
    Ratings Received:
    +44
    Okay, well let's see Reid do it then. Do you think he has the balls?

    LOL. You know damn well he doesn't.
  19. dangolegators
    Offline

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,875
    Likes Received:
    129
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +887
    Nah. I doubt we'll have a repub president any time soon, but if we do, so be it. The repubs have made obstruction to almost everything the new standard. The dems will now do the same thing if the roles are reversed. If the filibuster were being used as it historically has been, with just a bit of discretion, then none of this would be necessary.
  20. madgator
    Offline

    madgator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2007
    Messages:
    8,809
    Likes Received:
    253
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    South Florida
    Ratings Received:
    +908
    Checks and balances

    which is needed

    as the winners are violating the constitution every which way.......


    FACT:
    Obama has 2 nominations that have violated the constitution....

Share This Page