Nuclear option? Go ahead, Reid. Make our day.

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by MastaG8r, Jul 11, 2013.

  1. MastaG8r

    MastaG8r New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,039
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    305, USA
    Ratings Received:
    +44
    I say go for it, Dems. Simple majority. Let's do it like that from now on.

    Dare you.
  2. gregthegator

    gregthegator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    2,468
    Likes Received:
    101
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +306
    the dog & pony or smoke & mirrors show has gotten you EXCITED...calm down...in the end...they'll vote for their BEST interest together...you & I be damned...:sick:
  3. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    32,701
    Likes Received:
    2,464
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +4,325
    The Dems will cheat in every which way they can to steal a vote or to get an appointee nominated. If the system blocks them legally they tray and change the system to ram through their enslavement agenda proponent.
  4. Row6

    Row6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +26
    We agree. Let's do it. The president should be able to nominate officers in his administration without a super majority. Who disagree s with that?
  5. MastaG8r

    MastaG8r New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,039
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    305, USA
    Ratings Received:
    +44
    Not me. And I won't change my mind in about 2 1/2 years, either. But I bet you will. :bored:
  6. Row6

    Row6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +26
    No, I won't change my mind when Hillary's elected but even if you guys win the v presidency again - after going 1 for 6 in the popular vote - I'll still support not requiring super majority's for confirming executive branch appointments.

    Now, what's your excuse for favoring that ridiculous idea?
  7. altalias

    altalias Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2008
    Messages:
    1,340
    Likes Received:
    262
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +262
    Harry Reid did when the pubs were in charge.
  8. Row6

    Row6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +26
    Look at the scoreboard. Since the republicans lost the Senate in 2006 frequency of holds and filibusters have double and triple previous years. The losers are trying to run the country.
  9. Row6

    Row6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +26
    c'mon Harry - make masta's and my day!!
  10. g8rjd

    g8rjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    7,236
    Likes Received:
    261
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Tallahassee, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +387
    Have to admit, the 60 vote requirement is hardly democratic.
  11. GatorNorth

    GatorNorth Premium Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    9,511
    Likes Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Ratings Received:
    +666
    No more so than imposing the "Hastert Rule" in the house. Both sides are dysfunctional regardless of the majority party. It's nauseating to watch our elected officials try to not govern this country.
  12. MastaG8r

    MastaG8r New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,039
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    305, USA
    Ratings Received:
    +44
    I'm confused...you favor what you regard as a ridiculous idea?
  13. dangolegators

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,348
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +612
    Sounds like this is what everyone wants. So good, let's do it.
  14. MastaG8r

    MastaG8r New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,039
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    305, USA
    Ratings Received:
    +44
    ^^ Another one who was no doubt singing a different tune (just like Dirty Harry was) when the shoe was on the other foot, and will go right back to singing that old tune again the next time a Republican's in office with a slim GOP majority.
  15. JerseyGator01

    JerseyGator01 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    15,101
    Likes Received:
    133
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +582
    Fat white lawyers Reid and the word "leadership" should never be mentioned in the same sentence.

    CORRUPTION RULES!!!!!
  16. dadx4

    dadx4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    29,102
    Likes Received:
    439
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Greenville SC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,026
    If Reid is not a dead man walking I don't know what is. You liberals would be going nuts if the pubs did this.
  17. fredsanford

    fredsanford VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    11,858
    Likes Received:
    164
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +1,150
    Nope. 60 votes for everything is ludicrous. And it's the pubs obstructionism that forced this.
  18. MastaG8r

    MastaG8r New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,039
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    305, USA
    Ratings Received:
    +44
    Okay, well let's see Reid do it then. Do you think he has the balls?

    LOL. You know damn well he doesn't.
  19. dangolegators

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,348
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +612
    Nah. I doubt we'll have a repub president any time soon, but if we do, so be it. The repubs have made obstruction to almost everything the new standard. The dems will now do the same thing if the roles are reversed. If the filibuster were being used as it historically has been, with just a bit of discretion, then none of this would be necessary.
  20. madgator

    madgator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2007
    Messages:
    8,282
    Likes Received:
    107
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    South Florida
    Ratings Received:
    +465
    Checks and balances

    which is needed

    as the winners are violating the constitution every which way.......


    FACT:
    Obama has 2 nominations that have violated the constitution....

Share This Page