http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2014/02/07/could-nbas-age-limit-increase-to-20/ Who knows if this becoming a "priority" makes it any more realistic than it was under Stern, but lets just go with it and assume its possible. We've talked a lot about issues surrounding entry to the NBA before and I know we're all over the board on this and that lots of people have good points. My question is this, if option 1 meant leaving things exactly as they are and option 2 meant changing the rule to "2 and done," which would you choose? I'd pick the 2-year rule. I don't like delaying their entry into the NBA at all but, remember, we only have these two options. I guess I'm able to rationalize further delay because of how much it would benefit both the NBA and college basketball. Maybe players who aren't interested in college will be more likely to go overseas. I could live with that and wouldn't blame them. I'm somewhat torn, but I'd go 2 years. How bout you?