NCAA Rule Changes - Redshirts and Transfers

Discussion in 'RayGator's Swamp Gas' started by incoldblood, Jun 13, 2018.

  1. incoldblood

    incoldblood GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2016
    Messages:
    527
    Likes Received:
    113
    Trophy Points:
    248
    Ratings Received:
    +968
    The NCAA has passed two new rules changes:

    1- Players can now play in up to four games and still redshirt

    2- Coaches can no longer block players from transfering to any specific school
    • Like Like x 4
  2. savgator1956

    savgator1956 Freshman

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2017
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    273
    Ratings Received:
    +37
    Saban won't like this
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. your_perfect_enemy

    your_perfect_enemy GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Messages:
    5,592
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    218
    Ratings Received:
    +6,636
    Is it any 4 games? I don't know why but, for some reason I feel like it should only be the first 4 games otherwise there's going to be some gaming the system
    • Agree Agree x 5
  4. incoldblood

    incoldblood GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2016
    Messages:
    527
    Likes Received:
    113
    Trophy Points:
    248
    Ratings Received:
    +968
    He sure won't. He has been vocal about keeping the rule as-is.
  5. incoldblood

    incoldblood GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2016
    Messages:
    527
    Likes Received:
    113
    Trophy Points:
    248
    Ratings Received:
    +968
    I believe it is any four games. Of course coaches will game the system.
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  6. MtownGator

    MtownGator GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2012
    Messages:
    2,554
    Likes Received:
    312
    Trophy Points:
    128
    Location:
    Memphis,Tn
    Ratings Received:
    +1,845
    Pandora's box?
  7. INGATORSWETRUST

    INGATORSWETRUST GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    15,706
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    628
    Location:
    Florida
    Ratings Received:
    +4,524
    Good. There should be some positive player initiatives. Now can come in at end of season, if an injury late in year, weakens depth chart, and still not lose the year. Personally I would give them 5 years, if they only play special teams the first year. The longer they stay in college, the more likely to also get grad degree while there
    • Like Like x 2
  8. UF24ou14

    UF24ou14 GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    Messages:
    1,845
    Likes Received:
    200
    Trophy Points:
    223
    Ratings Received:
    +2,162
    So some of those 5 stars that he keeps piling up will start transferring. He's like Bear Bryant who would sign players just to keep them from going elsewhere and competing against Bama.
    • Agree Agree x 3
  9. mulegator

    mulegator Neanderthal Ninja Vigilante Moderator VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    7,894
    Likes Received:
    3,964
    Trophy Points:
    748
    Location:
    Tallahassee
    Ratings Received:
    +13,899
    Gaming the system?
    Isn't that what every smart coach does?
    • Agree Agree x 4
  10. manigordo

    manigordo GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    5,383
    Likes Received:
    156
    Trophy Points:
    238
    Location:
    San MIguel de Allende. Mexico
    Ratings Received:
    +1,053
    Maybe, but with your signature, I would have guessed that you would have an unfavorable opinion of "gaming the system."

    On a lighter note, I was just at the most significant Neandertal dig in the world (Les Eyzies, France); 8 of the 21 full skeletons found there. I met with one of the heads of the dig and learned mountains about Neandertal!

    I know.... multiple off topics to the post. Sorry....

    HOw about, speaking of Alabama...Neandertals!
    • Funny Funny x 1
  11. CHFG8R

    CHFG8R GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,250
    Likes Received:
    321
    Trophy Points:
    308
    Location:
    St. Augustine, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +3,334
    Bingo! So much easier. Just give them 5 years and be done with it.

    Not a huge fan of not being able to block. I think there should be some conditions where you can, or maybe you allow up to a certain number of schools. I can see this turning into a real *&%$show, especially when you consider how dirty the recruiting game is anyway. The idea of schools recruiting - actively or through intermediaries - players on the current roster is problematic (and inevitable IMO) to say the least.
  12. mulegator

    mulegator Neanderthal Ninja Vigilante Moderator VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    7,894
    Likes Received:
    3,964
    Trophy Points:
    748
    Location:
    Tallahassee
    Ratings Received:
    +13,899
    To me
    Gaming the system simply means taking advantage of the rules to give your guys a better chance to win.
  13. Spurffelbow833

    Spurffelbow833 GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    8,643
    Likes Received:
    476
    Trophy Points:
    623
    Ratings Received:
    +7,847
    Players who skip the bowl game before the draft should have to refund that entire year of their scholarships. Don't get drafted? Don't get paid much? Too bad. Pay up. The young world is drowning in student loan debt. If that's all your chance to play college football meant to you, get in line with everyone else.
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  14. your_perfect_enemy

    your_perfect_enemy GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Messages:
    5,592
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    218
    Ratings Received:
    +6,636
    You're right on this and your later post about just taking advantage of the rules presented. I don't think gaming the system is the right phrase, maybe not do it in the spirit of the rule? I could just be completely wrong on this but just picking random games to play the guys in doesn't feel right to me
  15. theghost

    theghost GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2011
    Messages:
    4,016
    Likes Received:
    533
    Trophy Points:
    343
    Location:
    DC area
    Ratings Received:
    +5,649
    There's no "system" to game here. It's actually quite simple: they can play in ANY four games. Key word is "any". If they play in five games guess what happens....they can't redshirt. The old "system" got gamed. Because if you played in 1 game you're supposed to lose a redshirt...hell, 1 play. But the schools "gamed the system" by saying "he was injured" and that garnered a redshirt.

    I like the new rule. It's good for college football.
  16. themistocles

    themistocles VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    13,589
    Likes Received:
    549
    Trophy Points:
    583
    Ratings Received:
    +4,326
    Historically, the # of games has been a percentage. 3 games is 25% of 12, 4 is 33%.

    I guess it makes a certain amount more sense to set that at 3 than 4, although when you get a kid who does the opening kickoff in the 4th game, then is crippled for a year, it does make a lot of sense to use 4.

    I tend to agree with Saban on this one although generally, I feel that the Transfer rules have always been excessively restrictive to the kids, who are the important people, not the Coaches, Funder$ or the Fans. If you can get accepted, in today's College Environment, Transfer is used by 60% of those who graduate, although a lot of those are CC Transfers.
  17. theghost

    theghost GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2011
    Messages:
    4,016
    Likes Received:
    533
    Trophy Points:
    343
    Location:
    DC area
    Ratings Received:
    +5,649
    It was a percentage of games....but the school also had to claim it was due to medical reasons (he injured his toe, or pulled a hamstring). Basically, they were forced to lie to save the redshirt. And it could only be within the first 3 games. This new rule is much more clear on that; no more lying about an injury and they can play the 12th game of the year, or the bowl game and not lose the year. It's a great change for college football.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. 96Gatorcise

    96Gatorcise GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    7,378
    Likes Received:
    758
    Trophy Points:
    433
    Location:
    Tampa
    Ratings Received:
    +9,338
    definitely some planning and gamesmanship will have to be played.

    When do you bring a kid in? If it appears you have a chance to make it to the championship game, you would have to delay bringing in a kid until the last game of the regular season.

    If you have no hope of making your conference game. You can give young guys plenty of late year experience in the regular season.
  19. grantgator

    grantgator Junior

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    208
    Ratings Received:
    +64
    This is not changing the fact that they generally will still have to sit a year when they transfer. I think I like this change as it gives the players at least a little bit of control back. Blocking a transfer was just a crap move, if they weren't good enough to play for your team, why the big worry anyway?
  20. CHFG8R

    CHFG8R GC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,250
    Likes Received:
    321
    Trophy Points:
    308
    Location:
    St. Augustine, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +3,334
    I agree for the most part. But what if it's just the result of a logjam. Do we really want to see F$U (or whomever) sending feelers out to our 2nd string guys mid-season?