Didn't your teacher ever teach you that the only 'dumb' question, is the one that goes unasked? I'm just trying to wrap my mind around what is motivating your apparent headstrong determination to downplay every piece of damning evidence to JW, and overstate every piece that is either remotely vindicating or mitigating, of him--while simultaneously dong just the opposite wrt to the vic. I don't care for JW. If I didn't think he raped her...I'd say...sorry fella's, I don't see it. And leave it at that. There is no 'justice' in defending JW here. No point. Nothing to gain--unless your a 'nole, and you're emotionally invested in his 'vindication'. ...yet you keep posting and posting over and over again, how little evidence is damning to jw, and how much is supposedly damning to the vic's case. I held my peace for several pages of your posts--for several days--today, I finally felt inclined to chime in. I simply find your determination to this 'cause' to be quite perplexing. That's all.