Left-Wing Democrat Kirsten Powers - From Atheist to Christian

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by gatormonk, Nov 5, 2013.

  1. wgbgator
    Offline

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    23,885
    Likes Received:
    492
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +2,180
    Considering I threw in "if" as a qualifier, I think is pretty apparent that the answer is no.
  2. lacuna
    Offline

    lacuna Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    9,082
    Likes Received:
    380
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Gainesville
    Ratings Received:
    +865
    "through"? or threw?
  3. wgbgator
    Offline

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    23,885
    Likes Received:
    492
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +2,180
    Threw. Thanks.
  4. philobeddoe
    Offline

    philobeddoe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Messages:
    7,097
    Likes Received:
    136
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +674
    You only qualified the condition of her making claims .... not the following:

    "then she was always suited for zealotry of some sort, be it religious or secular in nature."

    I'm just asking you you are absolutely certain in the accuracy your consequence in this material condition?

    And if you are absolutely certain in the consequence .... what is the basis of this certainty, factual knowledge?
  5. wgbgator
    Offline

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    23,885
    Likes Received:
    492
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +2,180
    First, I have suspended judgment in lieu of facts ('if"), and second, being "suited" for something tempermentally does not necessarily make you something. Any other quibles?
  6. 108
    Online

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    18,538
    Likes Received:
    498
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,911
    What is the intention of this post by the OP?
  7. philobeddoe
    Offline

    philobeddoe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Messages:
    7,097
    Likes Received:
    136
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +674
    LOL, nice try ..... but your problem and failure was the absolute "she was always suited". I'm just trying to secure from you why Powers "was" (typically used by most to denote a factual absolute - eg Bill Clinton was PotUS) "always" ""suited for", qualified for or predisposed to "zealotry". It was your unqualified assertion ..... she "was" and there must be some basis for that.

    Or, are you now saying that she was not "suited" for such .... or that she is not now suited for such? Or .... that all is dependent upon what your definition of "was" was ... or is .. or maybe likely would have been at the time but may now be different?


    :joecool:
  8. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    35,060
    Likes Received:
    2,843
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +6,046
    Her politics on Fox News have been, in the past, pretty leftist.
  9. wgbgator
    Offline

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    23,885
    Likes Received:
    492
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +2,180
    Your excessive belaboring of my statement in search of some sort of "gotcha" suggests to me you are well-suited to be a TV lawyer. Now, that doesnt mean you are a TV lawyer.
  10. philobeddoe
    Offline

    philobeddoe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Messages:
    7,097
    Likes Received:
    136
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +674
    Well ...... setting aside your likely intentional mischaracterization of the purpose of my query .... in spite of (my expectation that) you may want others to think you possess an accurate understanding of my intent, I have cause to believe that you are quite likely well suited, based upon experience, to know what it takes to be a "TV lawyer".

    So again .... why "was" Powers inclined to be a zealot???? And is she still so inclined?
  11. wgbgator
    Offline

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    23,885
    Likes Received:
    492
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +2,180
    Maybe you should reread my statement then, because the answer to your questions should be apparent. If it isnt, then I can't do much else to help you.
  12. philobeddoe
    Offline

    philobeddoe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Messages:
    7,097
    Likes Received:
    136
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +674
    So, to clarify .... you have no answer. You have no basis for your unqualified assertion ..... Unless your defintion of "was" may have changed subsequent to it's possible initial abuse.
  13. wgbgator
    Offline

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    23,885
    Likes Received:
    492
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +2,180
    Yes, I do have no basis, which is why I said "if" she is engaging in certain behavior then she was .... Why this wasnt immediately obvious to you and why you decided to take it outside of the context of a reply to another posters statement that I was responding to, I have no idea.
  14. philobeddoe
    Offline

    philobeddoe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Messages:
    7,097
    Likes Received:
    136
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +674

Share This Page