Labor Participation Rate Hits 34-Year Low

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by mocgator, Aug 29, 2013.

  1. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    At the height of the boom in 2005 it was the worst labor participation rate in 18 years.

    Some perspective.
  2. rivergator
    Offline

    rivergator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    31,981
    Likes Received:
    383
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,887
    Dad, again, the participation rate was much lower in the '50s that it is now. Do you consider them to be a far worse economic time than now?
  3. gatorev12
    Offline

    gatorev12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Messages:
    11,694
    Likes Received:
    287
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,534
    Again, were millions of women active participants in the labor market in the '50s?
  4. gatorman_07732
    Offline

    gatorman_07732 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    31,280
    Likes Received:
    2,251
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    The Irish Riviera
    Ratings Received:
    +4,293
    Being that the norm is full-time working married couples with a famiy you are correct.

Share This Page