Labor Participation Rate Hits 34-Year Low

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by mocgator, Aug 29, 2013.

  1. mocgator

    mocgator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    280
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The ATL
    Ratings Received:
    +552
    The obvious outcome of liberal policies and no real focus on improving the business climate... This is not Bush's fault so save it. This is the inevitable outcome of an anti freedom, anti business, and anti capitalism regime.

    Now back to Travon, global warming and gay marriage... you know... the important stuff..

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/08/28/Labor-Participation-Rate-Hits-34-Year-Low

    The percentage of Americans who have a job or are looking for one, known as the labor force participation rate (LFPR), has plunged to a 34-year low, according to a new report from staffing company Express Employment Professionals.

    [​IMG]

    "Following the Great Recession, we've entered into the Great Shift," says Express Employment Professionals CEO Bob Funk, who previously served as chairman of the Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank. "This is a period defined by the Boomer retirement, Millennial frustration, and growing reliance on government programs. All indicators suggest this shift is not sustainable."

    The New York Times reported on the study and suggested that "another cause [of the Great Shift] may be the rise in the number of workers on disability."

    A record 8,733,461 people now receive disability benefits, a figure greater than the population of New York City.

    Today, nearly 90 million Americans are no longer in the labor force.
  2. orangeblueorangeblue

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    It's actually the obvious outcome of this

    [​IMG]

    But I don't want to get in the way of a good ole fashioned partisan rant.
  3. mocgator

    mocgator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    280
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The ATL
    Ratings Received:
    +552
    You really need to look at your chart and mine again. Give it a hard look.
  4. gatorman_07732

    gatorman_07732 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    30,694
    Likes Received:
    2,181
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    The Irish Riviera
    Ratings Received:
    +3,969
    What your graph fails to explain is the record number of 50+ year olds out of work
  5. orangeblueorangeblue

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    The labor force participation rate has been going down since 1998. I have done an inverse of the birth rate graph overlapped on the participation rate graph 60 years later and it's basically a perfect match.
  6. orangeblueorangeblue

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    In other words, Dem, Pub, doesn't matter. A declining participation rate is a guarantee, at least over the next 10-20 years.
  7. orangeblueorangeblue

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    Please explain. People who are close to retirement age started spiking about 14 years ago, a 60 year parallax with the increase in birth rate.

    Use your noggin on this one.
  8. rivergator

    rivergator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    31,734
    Likes Received:
    363
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,760
    I'm not sure what's behind it. The participation rate started rising in the mid-'60s and rose steadily until the late '90s. They've been declining ever since. But they're still well above the 1950s, which a lot of people seem to think were the glory days. If a participation rate of 63 percent means the country is really hurting, did the 1950s rate of 58, 59 percent mean the country was one giant hell hole back then?

    As far as why they're dropping, I don't know.
    Are they going down because people who need and want to work can't find jobs?
    Or is it because more wives don't need to work because their husbands make enough? (or vice versa)
  9. jimgata

    jimgata Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    8,464
    Likes Received:
    119
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +681
    You had to work for what you got in the 50's. Money was not all that easy to come by, but no one broke out in a rash when the word WORK was spoken.
  10. dangolegators

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,348
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +612
    The labor participation rate went up because more women started working, which was also 'the obvious outcome of liberal policies', I'm sure, as far a Moc is concerned. The labor participation rate is going down now because a greater percentage of Americans are at or above retirement age combined with the lingering effects of the recession. This is also the fault of liberal policies according to Moc.
  11. wgbgator

    wgbgator Sub-optimal Poster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    22,805
    Likes Received:
    382
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,523
    Everyone walked 10 miles in the snow uphill both ways to work too, didn't complain one bit. Got sticks and coal for Christmas every year too, made a trainset out of it, and got a firm handshake and "at a boy" on birthdays. Farts smelled like roses too. I tell you, those were the days.
  12. orangeblueorangeblue

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    "The old days were better"

    - some dad in literally every generation ever
  13. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Moderator VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    34,597
    Likes Received:
    1,203
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    1001 Rockdale Blvd. Miami, OK. 74354
    Ratings Received:
    +2,133
    The labor force participation rate that was in the first graph is a PERCENTAGE of the workforce that is working or looking for work. It has nothing to do with the baby boom or retirement. If you are retired you are not in the labor force to begin with.

    But I don't want to get in the way of a good ole fashioned liberal close my eyes to the problem lets follow Obama to the grave position. :roll:
  14. orangeblueorangeblue

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    That is still directly related as people near retirement age (which is older than the age most people retire) leave the workforce. As they constitute an increasing percentage of people counted in the workforce.

    And if you suppose that recognizing this means "following Obama to the grave," I'd also be "following Bush to the grave" since the pattern started there.
  15. LeesGator

    LeesGator Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,627
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Ratings Received:
    +4
    Job market still sucks, no way to spin that. However, several factors contribute to that, not just "liberal policies".
  16. orangeblueorangeblue

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    Yeah I would never argue that the job market is doing well nor that Obama is a good economic president. But you have to look at the trend and the things that contribute to it.
  17. philnotfil

    philnotfil Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    12,194
    Likes Received:
    103
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +322
    What is the ideal labor force participation rate? Are we moving towards that ideal or away from that ideal?
  18. rivergator

    rivergator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    31,734
    Likes Received:
    363
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,760
    that is the question, isn't it?
  19. dangolegators

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,348
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +612
    Well, you're completely wrong. The labor force participation rate is the percentage of working age Americans (aged 16 and older) who either have a job, or are looking for a job. The numerator is the labor force. The denominator is number of Americans 16 or older. So this, of course, has plenty to do with the baby boom or retirement because when people retire they fall out of the labor force (the numerator), but remain Americans (the denominator). People from their late 50s on are much more likely to retire than younger people are, so the baby boom definitely has an effect.

    No one has claimed that retirement is the only reason the labor force participation rate is going down, but it is one of the major reasons for it.

    But don't worry, you're not getting in the way of anything, other than the facts.
  20. dadx4

    dadx4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    29,074
    Likes Received:
    431
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Greenville SC
    Ratings Received:
    +992
    You guys are really giving the worst labor participation rate in 34 years and you are blowing it off and blaming everything else. You liberals crack me up. I am sure it's because of kiosks and atm's that are doing this and NOT Hussein's policies.

Share This Page