John Boehner's Shutdown

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by GatorBen, Oct 2, 2013.

  1. Lawdog88
    Offline

    Lawdog88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    30,044
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Inside the War Room, No Name City, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,539

    Rep for major realization !
  2. Lawdog88
    Offline

    Lawdog88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    30,044
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Inside the War Room, No Name City, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,539

    Rep for major funniness. Clever indeed.
  3. gatorev12
    Offline

    gatorev12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Messages:
    11,511
    Likes Received:
    259
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,276
    Thank you. Honestly, it's no wonder that our politicians conduct themselves in this way when so many voters are just as blinded in their partisanship.

    I'm by no means excusing anyone in the Republican Party here, even as a conservative. I hate Obamacare and support conservatives that say we need to cut back on entitlement spending---but if you're going to pull this stunt, you damn well better have a plan and darn well better be prepared. Otherwise, this entire thing needlessly and recklessly puts millions of jobs in a holding pattern and will do serious long-term damage to the economy.

    Congressional representatives represent people from both sides of the aisle. So does the President. They're there to find compromise. That's their jobs.

    This nonsense of pointing fingers and saying "we won't listen" is childish and immature. Our country is more important than that and the American people deserve better.
  4. FlyingGatorII
    Offline

    FlyingGatorII Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    2,657
    Likes Received:
    156
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +453
    "It is extremely unlikely that the Treasury is not going to continue to pay on those securities," Moody's CEO Raymond McDaniel said in an interview with CNBC.

    "Hopefully it is unlikely that we go past October 17 and fail to raise the debt ceiling, but even if that does happen, then we think that the U.S. Treasury is still going to pay on those Treasury securities," he added.
  5. MichiGator2002
    Online

    MichiGator2002 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    15,524
    Likes Received:
    402
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,670
    They are constitutionally obligate to pay on bonds and treasury notes. They are obligated under federal law to pay SS. Any politician or journalist telling you this "shutdown" threatens either of those is a liar and a damn liar. There is enough money coming in to pay for 75% of the government without borrowing any more.
  6. gatorev12
    Offline

    gatorev12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Messages:
    11,511
    Likes Received:
    259
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,276
    Dupe ...sorry!
  7. GatorBen
    Online

    GatorBen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    6,378
    Likes Received:
    335
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,398
    They're also obligated under federal law to pay everything else and there is no impoundment power anymore...

    Why does this conversation end every time I point that out, only to bring it up and require the observation again in another thread?
  8. gatorman_07732
    Online

    gatorman_07732 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    29,843
    Likes Received:
    2,131
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    The Irish Riviera
    Ratings Received:
    +3,651
    Because you're wrong
  9. GatorBen
    Online

    GatorBen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    6,378
    Likes Received:
    335
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,398
    There's an argument that it is the least potentially unconstitutional of the options, but there isn't legal authority to do it.

    And I'm not sure that "perhaps the least illegal" is really a peg to proudly hang your hat on...

    It could be made to be legal, but it requires a payment prioritization bill to become law sometime in the next week.
  10. gatorman_07732
    Online

    gatorman_07732 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    29,843
    Likes Received:
    2,131
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    The Irish Riviera
    Ratings Received:
    +3,651
    Defaulting is completely unconstitutional as implied by the constitution. This is why Obama's plan B is to use the 14th Amendment and circumvent congress to unilaterally raise the debt ceiling.
  11. GatorBen
    Online

    GatorBen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    6,378
    Likes Received:
    335
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,398
    Correct. But that doesn't make payment prioritization legal. If we're going to look at violating statutory commands (which in the absence of a prioritization bill, that would) you have plenty of other options too, including allowing the Fed to lend directly to Treasury, exchanging debt subject to limit held by government agencies for debt that isn't subject to the limit, and a bunch of other stuff.

Share This Page