I think the biggest surprise for me concerning the IRS stuff and the NSA stuff

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by g8orbill, Jun 18, 2013.

  1. g8orbill

    g8orbill Gators VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    70,505
    Likes Received:
    4,413
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Clermont, Fl
    Ratings Received:
    +9,051
    is the liberals on too hot supporting it and supporting obama on it- I would have expected them to come out howling at how big brother was snooping- who woulda ever thought they would be for it-but based upon everything Iread on here and in the LMSM-they support it and support obama for doing it

    who woulda thunk
  2. rivergator

    rivergator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    31,777
    Likes Received:
    366
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,778
    Just starting with the IRS. Who has supported it?
  3. MichaelJoeWilliamson

    MichaelJoeWilliamson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Messages:
    6,820
    Likes Received:
    415
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +497
    The poll about this was revealing. Most people support "their" guy more than they support an abstract idea.
  4. JerseyGator01

    JerseyGator01 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    15,113
    Likes Received:
    134
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +587
    The cult of personality strikes again. US government = biggest cult in world history.

    Are you new here, Bill?
  5. philnotfil

    philnotfil Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    12,243
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +351
    You were surprised by this reaction? Those who are blindly partisan, on both sides, will continue to be blindly partisan even when their side does what the other side was doing, or when the other side does what their side was doing. Nothing new to see here.
  6. PIMking

    PIMking New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    10,535
    Likes Received:
    895
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tuscaloosa, AL (Ft. Myers)
    Ratings Received:
    +895
    how many pubs supported Bush and the patriot act?
    Now that it's a democrat people on the right that did support it now are against it.
  7. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,943
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +146
    From what I can determine almost no one regardless of political philosophy or party affiliation supports the IRS decision to single out tea party applicant for 501(c)(4) status. The difference is that conservatives are absolutely convinced that Obama must have been behind the decision despite the total absence of evidence supporting that assertion. As far as the NSA surveillance is concerned, a number of liberals have expressed opposition to the practice as have some tea party conservatives. The majority of mainstream politicians from both parties continue to support the surveillance programs or are withholding judgement. Interestingly, most conservatives did not object to the NSA surveillance programs when they were originally conducted by the Bush administration without the formality of search warrants. At least the Obama administration went through the formality of obtaining search warrants from the FISA court.
    • Like Like x 1
  8. 108

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    17,840
    Likes Received:
    313
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,217
    nothing has been proven that there is a link to the WH with the IRS....and it's not like they were not approving groups that should have been approved...an office used words to query that they found were coming in at a high rate...70% which didn't meet the legal requirements

    as for the NSA, i welcome the debate of what is considered too intrusive, but the fact that it just just a continuation of what was before, is hard to get overly excited about....we would have to be really naive to think that Government would give up a tool like this unless it was deemed unconstitutional
  9. fastsix

    fastsix Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Messages:
    6,392
    Likes Received:
    232
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Seattle
    Ratings Received:
    +1,048
    You summed it up nicely, but your summary will be ignored by people like g8orbill. They'll continue to see what they want to see and nothing more or less.
  10. gregthegator

    gregthegator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    2,468
    Likes Received:
    101
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +306
    EXACTLY like YOU DID when yore boy Bush STARTED the whole mess....:sick:

    what a hypercrit...

    BOTH parties are FULLY aware of what's going on...they BOTH voted or OK'd way BACK when...

    Much like THE banking crisis was brought by Clinton...cRAT/Grahm...pugster...1998....repeal of Glass/Stegal...
  11. GatorRade

    GatorRade Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    6,780
    Likes Received:
    195
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +595
  12. enviroGator

    enviroGator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,316
    Likes Received:
    56
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +249
    Personally, I think the IRS guy that came up with the idea to "screen" for tea party names should have gotten a bonus or at least a pat on the back. He/she was doing his job and found an efficient way to find questionable applications.

    Political groups shouldn't have been getting 501(c)(4) exemptions! Period, end of story.

    The only scandal is that -

    1) Ultimately none of them got denied.
    2) Liberal groups weren't being scrutinized.
  13. rivergator

    rivergator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    31,777
    Likes Received:
    366
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,778
    Bill, you started this thread claiming that liberals on Too Hot supported the IRS targeting conservative groups. Are you really claiming that's true?
  14. g8trjax

    g8trjax Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2007
    Messages:
    2,999
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +325
    It does appear to be OK to support bullying and spying on Americans, if someone else supported it in the past.
  15. 108

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    17,840
    Likes Received:
    313
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,217
    i don't think it's even that liberal groups weren't being scrutinized, as they were, it's that they weren't all using a similar name that made it easy to query

    i have no doubt they would have done the same thing, given the testimony that we've heard from a self-described "conservative-republican"
  16. 92gator

    92gator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    5,927
    Likes Received:
    309
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +850
    The difference:

    The PA was sold as seeking to target terrorists.

    It was resisted by teh potential for abuse--(mostly by the left).

    The IRS case in particular, isn't potential abuse--it is clear abuse--with no pretense at targeting terrorists--just straight up targeting US citizens, for political gains.

    It's not hypocrisy to complain about actual abuse of authority after the fact, simply because the potential for abuse was latent, and foreknown.


    It is however, hypocritical to complain to the high-heavens about the potential for abuse....then to sit qujetly by--nay, endorse ACTUAL abuse of authority...simply because it is politically expedient for your cause, that the abuse was directed at your foe.

    IMHO.
  17. 108

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    17,840
    Likes Received:
    313
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,217
    no evidence has been shown that the IRS situation was politically "directed at a foe"

    :no:
  18. 92gator

    92gator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    5,927
    Likes Received:
    309
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +850
    ^^^what???

    All the targeted parties were of a consistent political bent--conservative.

    If this were Bush II/Cheney, and teh targeted orgs were liberal advocacy groups, you'd surely be signing an entirely different tune.
    • Like Like x 1
  19. MichaelJoeWilliamson

    MichaelJoeWilliamson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Messages:
    6,820
    Likes Received:
    415
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +497
    You mean, other than directing against conservative groups? Who, by definition, are foes to Obama? You mean, other than directing it against Jewish groups that publicly expressed disagreement with Obama's views on Israel? You mean, other than directing it against Pro-Life groups, that are, by definition hostile to Obama's views on abortion in general and are appalled at his views on late term abortions. You mean other than all that.

    My goodness man, use the brain the good Lord gave you.
    • Like Like x 1
  20. 108

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    17,840
    Likes Received:
    313
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,217
    i don't give a chit about "what if"

    testimony came from self-described conservative workers of the IRS that set up the query based on the fact that so many applications were coming in based on the same names

    there is no evidence showing this was democrats looking to hurt republicans

Share This Page