How the GOP became the “White Man’s Party”

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by chompalot, Dec 22, 2013.

  1. fredsanford

    fredsanford VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    11,868
    Likes Received:
    171
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +1,173
    Because it's way more expensive for society to pay for their carelessness down the road.
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  2. gatorplank

    gatorplank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,181
    Likes Received:
    111
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +392
    I do not deny that government institutions have helped to bring innovations to our society, but I am still waiting to hear about all of those "societal innovations" that liberal politicians have made in this country.
    • Like Like x 2
  3. 108

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    17,842
    Likes Received:
    313
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,218
    it is, but good luck trying to force responsibility

    you can outlaw it if you'd like, and abortion would still happen with regularity

    humans aren't the most responsible creatures, especially when it comes to sexual desires, and that needs to be accepted and accounted for by giving them responsible methods to terminate unwanted pregnancies within a time limit
  4. 108

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    17,842
    Likes Received:
    313
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,218
    because, as of now, society, through its elected representatives, have decided that part of our tax money goes to funding these services for low income folks

    surely it would be nice for both of us to pick and choose where our individual taxes go to, but we don't have that choice at the moment
  5. g8orbill

    g8orbill Gators VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    70,531
    Likes Received:
    4,421
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Clermont, Fl
    Ratings Received:
    +9,060

    108- you cannot legislate it and I understand that all to well- just quit expecting me to pay for it
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. 108

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    17,842
    Likes Received:
    313
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,218
    tell me Bill, why should I be expected to pay for these wars that I have no faith at all in?

    neither of us have any control on how our taxes are spent, outside of trying to change it via the voting booth
  7. g8orbill

    g8orbill Gators VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    70,531
    Likes Received:
    4,421
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Clermont, Fl
    Ratings Received:
    +9,060

    wow you and I actually agree on something
  8. 108

    108 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    17,842
    Likes Received:
    313
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings Received:
    +1,218
    on that note, i wish you and your loved ones, a happy holidays together.

    i am off for a bit to go help feed the needy at the park near me
    Last edited: Dec 25, 2013
    • Like Like x 2
  9. candymanfromgc

    candymanfromgc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    5,308
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +296
    You know and I know that the democratic party has been detrimental to minorities. The only thing the Dems are good at is controlling the media and deception of the masses.
  10. madgator

    madgator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2007
    Messages:
    8,285
    Likes Received:
    107
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    South Florida
    Ratings Received:
    +465
    that's why they are now called "undocumented immigrants" and not "illegal immigrants"
  11. chemgator

    chemgator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    8,522
    Likes Received:
    204
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +984
    Regan wasn't in charge of spending in the 1980's--Tip O'Neill was. The fact that Reagan was able to work with Tip O'Neill and actually accomplish something important while minimizing the damage that Tip was doing to the federal debt is absolutely amazing. That's what makes Reagan the best president since FDR (both the historians AND the American people acknowledge this). Be sure to let us know when Obama accomplishes something--we'd like to know.

    You have been defeated.
  12. DeanMeadGator

    DeanMeadGator '63 Gator VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    2,585
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +162
    Hard work is hard. Some people don't want to do anything hard.
  13. rivergator

    rivergator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    31,790
    Likes Received:
    366
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,782
    so Reagan didn't present a budget to Congress each year? Didn't sign what Congress passed? And Obama has nothing to do with spending today?
  14. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    32,762
    Likes Received:
    2,468
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +4,345
    We are not a nanny state... people have the right to make their own choices in life. Government controls are never the answer, but making it financially restrictive (don't reward bad behavior) to those that make those mistakes are the only way to truly guide social behavior while allowing for people to also keep their freedom and liberty from an oppressive (redistributive) governance.
  15. dangolegators

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,348
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +612
    How it works is if it's a Republican president, spending is all congresses fault. If it's a Democrat president, spending is all the president's fault. That's just how it is.
  16. gatorpa

    gatorpa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    7,018
    Likes Received:
    72
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    East Coast of FL
    Ratings Received:
    +308
    All I heard was crickets.....
  17. chemgator

    chemgator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    8,522
    Likes Received:
    204
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +984
    No, I would say that Reagan gave in to O'Neill on many of the budget issues in exchange for a stronger military, which helped defeat the USSR and prepared us for Iraq in 1991. This means Reagan communicated with, cooperated with, and made compromises with the opposing party, which is something that Obama has been unable and unwilling to do. Obama believes he was elected king, and all others must bow before him and accept his word as gospel. He is very good at making enemies, both at home and abroad. Reagan was not as arrogant as Obama, and was a much harder-working president.
  18. asuragator

    asuragator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2009
    Messages:
    20,536
    Likes Received:
    4,090
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +6,081
    Seriously, you seem pretty smart chem, but my goodness take off your partisan glasses. If you are to be believed, everything Reagan did was perfect and nothing Obama does is right. It's just absurd partisan nonsense to claim such dichotomies.
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. vangator1

    vangator1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    2,309
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +163
    from Salon? Best laugh I've had today.
  20. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    32,762
    Likes Received:
    2,468
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +4,345
    It's still un-Constitutional... IMHO. It's stealing from Peter to pay Paul... Or, a flat out theft ring orchestrated for the benefit of one group at the expense of another...

Share This Page