I don't care - or know - how those that justify a perverted interpretation of scriptures, do it. I also don't care - or know - how churches justify a preverted interpretation of scriptures, to justify moral preversion. And I really don't care what a claimed "civil right" looks like if - IMO - it is founded on a moral perversion. That is what the homosexual thing really is, i.e., a moral perversion that is claiming to break out onto new ground as a civil right. I happily admit that I am guided in making moral discernments based on my Judeo-Christian teachings, upbringing, and the tenets of my faith, but they are confirmed - not by the Bible - but by my experience. So carry on with your push for homosexual perversion to be recognized as a civil right.