So, the premise of the article is that these teams are most likely to improve greatly from here on out, a la Stanford and A&M from last year. They lead with us and base pretty much all of our potential on Murphy starting at QB instead of Driskel. Using ESPN's QBR metric, they have Murphy at 96.1 and Driskel at 40.5 this year and 48.1 last year. So, basically they think the team has a better shot to win with Murphy. I think I can quote the part about us: They also included Georgia, LSU, and fsu on the list. This was written after we lost Easley, so Haney seems to think we can win at least two of those games against other top teams he also expects to get better. Would we have been expected to win those games with Driskel? I think so. How has our ceiling changed? Maybe it's higher now. Hard to tell after two games, but it seems like people are more hopeful now.