Debose

Discussion in 'RayGator's Swamp Gas' started by Gatuar, Mar 16, 2014.

  1. gatorr4life
    Offline

    gatorr4life Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    24,182
    Likes Received:
    732
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,632
    That's Espn for ya. Whatever looks best.
  2. Jaggator
    Offline

    Jaggator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Messages:
    74,828
    Likes Received:
    3,382
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +5,205
  3. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,052
    Likes Received:
    595
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,878
    This is actually journalistic style - it would impose bias to suggest that he tried to make peace, for example. That he was "involved," is truthful, that he was a "peace maker" would bring in subjectivity.
  4. SeaCay
    Offline

    SeaCay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    1,914
    Likes Received:
    82
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Lake Alice Field
    Ratings Received:
    +338
    They changed the headline today. I'll take credit for that thank you very much.
  5. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,052
    Likes Received:
    595
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,878
    Huh?

    "Andre Debose involved in dispute"
  6. SeaCay
    Offline

    SeaCay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    1,914
    Likes Received:
    82
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Lake Alice Field
    Ratings Received:
    +338
  7. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,052
    Likes Received:
    595
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,878
    Right, but still journalistically correct. They didn't call him a "peace maker," for example. They can quote someone saying it, however.

    "Involved" is still correct and the easiest way to describe what has turned into a bit of a confusion situation due to the police statements.
  8. SeaCay
    Offline

    SeaCay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    1,914
    Likes Received:
    82
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Lake Alice Field
    Ratings Received:
    +338
    Ya know, I could swear I stated that "involved" was technically correct in my first post in this thread. And, it's still "technically" correct. Involved does, still, offer the casual observer an incorrect assessment of his, involvement. And no, the easiest way to describe his involvement was with their corrected link on the NCCAF home page.
  9. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,052
    Likes Received:
    595
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,878
    Well I don't think that's necessarily true, either. If all you said about the situation was that Debose was incorrectly identified, it sort of downplays his "involvement" quite a bit. He was there. He got in a fight. He got thrown through a window. To simply leave it at being incorrectly identified as the assailant would be even less accurate.
  10. Tebowism0823
    Offline

    Tebowism0823 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2010
    Messages:
    14,049
    Likes Received:
    2,228
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tavares/G'Ville, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +6,104
    How was he in a fight when the apology from the police department states he tried breaking up the altercation multiple times before being pushed into the window? He wasn't in a fight; he was attacked. Two different things.

    http://www.alligatorarmy.com/2014/3...hrown-window-glass-incident-armed-disturbance
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,052
    Likes Received:
    595
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,878
    Huh?
    • Dislike Dislike x 2
  12. Tebowism0823
    Offline

    Tebowism0823 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2010
    Messages:
    14,049
    Likes Received:
    2,228
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tavares/G'Ville, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +6,104
    You stated he was in a fight when he wasn't. He was somewhere he shouldn't have been, according to him, but according to police he tried multiple times to break up whatever was taking place and was shoved through a window.

    Did I mistake what you said somehow?
  13. OaktownGator
    Offline

    OaktownGator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    27,208
    Likes Received:
    2,705
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +8,501
    Technically, he was "involved" in a fight, as involved is neutral as to how he was involved, so I think OBOB is correct there.

    Where I differ from OBOB is that I think "involved" by itself is misleading, because most people will assume it means he was an active combatant rather than someone trying to diffuse the fight, as the police indicated when they corrected the original report and apologized to him.
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. Tebowism0823
    Offline

    Tebowism0823 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2010
    Messages:
    14,049
    Likes Received:
    2,228
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tavares/G'Ville, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +6,104
    OBOB stated "he got in a fight". Getting in a fight means he wanted to partake in it as well. That wasn't the case. The word involved is very misleading so I agree with you there.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. OaktownGator
    Offline

    OaktownGator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    27,208
    Likes Received:
    2,705
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +8,501
    Oh... I see now, further up in one of the quotes. Yeah... "got in a fight" is definitely not an accurate portrayal based on the revised police report.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,052
    Likes Received:
    595
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,878
    But your complaint wasn't with my wording, it was with "involved in a fight" which is 100% true. Whether he "got in" a fight or not is another matter but not the subject of your issue.
  17. Tebowism0823
    Offline

    Tebowism0823 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2010
    Messages:
    14,049
    Likes Received:
    2,228
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tavares/G'Ville, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +6,104

    Do what? Everything I've said to you was in reference of you saying he was in a fight which he wasn't.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,052
    Likes Received:
    595
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,878
    Sigh ... I've been defending the use of "involved in a fight."
  19. SeaCay
    Offline

    SeaCay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    1,914
    Likes Received:
    82
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Lake Alice Field
    Ratings Received:
    +338
    So if I happen to be in a bank when it's hit by a few perps, the newspaper account of the events would be correct if I was described as being involved in the robbery? My employer would love that...
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  20. your_perfect_enemy
    Offline

    your_perfect_enemy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Messages:
    5,796
    Likes Received:
    305
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,572
    I find it amusing to argue journalistic correctness with what pretty much the entire profession has devolved into (and I'm not counting bloggers)

Share This Page