Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by rivergator, Jul 8, 2013.
even though all the Republican claims of voter fraud end up just like this one.
This isn't about disputing fictional arguments that cannot even be recalled. The OP made-up a story that no one can corroborate, and you want us to buy that malarkey at face value?
He's a fiction writer, that is all he is.
Because this is all about voter fraud, I sure you remember those threads too, OBOB. They're all the same.
Bath House Barry's Puppetmaster , George Soros owns the Company in Spain that counted the Presidential Votes .
No possibility of fraud ?
what story was made up?
Don't mention anything about voter fraud Darth.. It will force some people to remove their heads from the sand.
This would not surprise me one bit.
actually, the much greater possibility is that you are repeating a falsehood.
It is funny how the left(and the right does it, just not near as often or as well) likes to play the math semantic game.
Wonder if river, et all, played the same math/semantic game wrt the IRS scandal.
Wait, don't tell me, I already know the answer.
The OP is a falsehood.
The dems can bus those dead voters to the polls as much as they want, as long as they have a picture ID and can pull the lever with no assistance. Have at it.
Do not push your fingers to far into your ears. You can damage your ear drums.
“Those who cast the votes decide nothing.
Those who count the votes decide everything.”
Spanish company contracts with 900 U.S. jurisdictions to count votes
Come on, even the rightwing Blaze and Michelle Malkin laugh at this one.
Your story is wrong and biased, to prove it I'll link another biased news story who interviews other biased sources to prove that you're wrong.
he states that used SCYTL’s technologies during the Midterms were New York, Texas, Washington, California, Florida, Alabama, Missouri, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, New Mexico, Nebraska, West Virginia and Washington DC.
Owned by Soros?
Just another Too Hot thread where liberals point out the factual non-existence of a unicorn and conservatives say they don't care because they exist because they said so.
Do they really? :no: