I'll preface this with the disclaimer that I doubt we have a realistic shot at getting Shaw for a number of reasons. But I'm just curious, when replacement coaches who are likely as equally unattainable as Shaw are discussed here, why does nobody mention Shaw's name? I go a bunch of Stanford games out here and they're a hell of a lot of fun to watch play. Also, Shaw has proven himself to be a rock solid coach who didn't miss a beat when Harbaugh jumped to the No Fun League. In fact, I think there's an argument that Stanford is playing better under Shaw than they ever did under Harbaugh. So why Briles, Petersen, and, god forbid, Kingsbury, over David Shaw?