Creative math in jobs numbers

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by g8orbill, Feb 9, 2014.

  1. fredsanford
    Offline

    fredsanford VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    12,085
    Likes Received:
    195
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings Received:
    +1,381
    Don't you all realize that everything bad/shady/incorrect that happened before Obama is now his fault entirely?
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. dangolegators
    Online

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,396
    Likes Received:
    86
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +656
    In January 2010 the yearly revision was negative 902,000 jobs. Under Bush, in January 2007, the yearly revision was positive 754,000 jobs. Some years it adds jobs, some years it subtracts them. But in the mind of a regressive, it's always that Obama is up to something.
  3. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    33,059
    Likes Received:
    2,519
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +4,561
    Maybe Obama being a pathological liar has something to do with it...
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2014
  4. GatorBen
    Online

    GatorBen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    6,864
    Likes Received:
    444
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,868
    That would be someone who lies about the origins of words and how language develops?
  5. rivergator
    Offline

    rivergator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    31,948
    Likes Received:
    382
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,870
    exactly. it happens all the time, starting well before Obama took office.
  6. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    Well he's always issuing those etymologitive orders.
  7. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    33,059
    Likes Received:
    2,519
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +4,561
    He has a law degree, doesn't he? Case and point.
  8. GatorBen
    Online

    GatorBen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    6,864
    Likes Received:
    444
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,868
    Maybe Harvard is different, but my legal education included very, very little study of philology.

    (Here's a hint: you used the wrong word. "Philological" means having to do with the study of the origins of language.)
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    33,059
    Likes Received:
    2,519
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +4,561
    Lol...
  10. DeanMeadGator
    Offline

    DeanMeadGator '63 Gator VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    2,623
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +192
    Will the government ever calculate the unemployment rate by taking into account the number of people who just quit looking?? Assume that 10 people want a job but can't find one, and 5 people quit looking because they can't find one.

    Are there only 10 people counted as unemployed [yes]. This is so ridiculous that only the government could come up with it, and assume the American people are too stupid to understand it.
  11. asuragator
    Offline

    asuragator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2009
    Messages:
    20,536
    Likes Received:
    4,090
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +6,082
    They do. But for some policy purposes, it might be important to exclude from the calculations those who are "not employed and are not looking" since their inclusion would actually skew the numbers in some instances. Not so black & white.
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2014
  12. g8orbill
    Offline

    g8orbill Gators VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    71,224
    Likes Received:
    4,606
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Clermont, Fl
    Ratings Received:
    +9,694
  13. GatorBen
    Online

    GatorBen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    6,864
    Likes Received:
    444
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,868
    Now this goes more or less to the point I want to make.

    We've pretty prominently seen the accusations that the White House is "manipulating" the unemployment numbers to make themselves look better.

    So what qualifies as "manipulating the unemployment numbers to make themselves look better"?

    Apparently the simple act of not manipulating the way the unemployment data is released to make themselves look worse.
  14. dangolegators
    Online

    dangolegators Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,396
    Likes Received:
    86
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +656
  15. DeanMeadGator
    Offline

    DeanMeadGator '63 Gator VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    2,623
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +192
    No. Every problem was ascribed to Bush for years, until the statute of limitations ran out. Politicians point fingers and accomplish nothing worthwhile.

    Is it a surprise that the American public has lost faith in the federal government?

    As I see it, the real "losers" [as the deficit continues to spiral out of control] are our children and their children. Do we not care that we are decimating their financial futures?

    Shame on us.
  16. rivergator
    Offline

    rivergator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    31,948
    Likes Received:
    382
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,870
    yep. As far as I can tell, unemployment is being figured the way it's always been. but now conservatives think that makes Obama look good so, by golly, it's just not right. It's manipulation and we need to change it!!!
    Or something like that.

Share This Page