COTTO: The Tea Party should split from the GOP

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by chompalot, Oct 16, 2013.

  1. LittleBlueLW
    Offline

    LittleBlueLW Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    5,593
    Likes Received:
    786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +1,287
    Yea, but there is exactly zero chance of the latter happening. Zero.
  2. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    I think that not only *should* the Tea Party (you know, the real one focused with laser-focus on government spending, taxation reduction and debt reduction) tell the GOP to get lost, I believe they'd do very well as an *actual* third party.

    The reality is that the power structure (Republican and Democrat) saw this early groundswell, recognized it was a threat to the system wherein the same people are constantly re-elected through political theater intended to cement partisanship and put their boot on the throat. GOP members swooped in and started calling themselves "the Tea Party candidate" while saddling the name with a bunch of traditional GOP baggage.

    The Tea Party deserves better. Being good and playing in the GOP sandbox is just a waste of an otherwise honorable movement.
  3. channingcrowderhungry
    Offline

    channingcrowderhungry Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    4,832
    Likes Received:
    162
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Ratings Received:
    +712
    I think the issue with the tea party becoming a "third party" is where they would have to fall on social issues. You can't run strictly on an economic platform without addressing the social questions candidates face. If they chose social conservatism, they lose the libertarian sect. If they chose social liberalism, they lose the Christian sect. I think to be viable they would have to pass the buck that these issues are states rights, and essentially adopt the libertarian platform. Problem is, we already have a libertarian party that garners about 1% of the vote every cycle. It's a tough spot to be in, I think.
    • Like Like x 1
  4. HallGator
    Offline

    HallGator Administrator VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    43,444
    Likes Received:
    901
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Outer Limits
    Ratings Received:
    +3,527
    I think one only needs to see the names those, who claim to be a part of the TP, routinely hurl at anyone who takes a different stance than them on TH to see why there is an ever-widening schism in the Rep Party.
  5. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    I don't believe a party must choose this, though. This can be maintained at the candidate level. Essentially what this does is say "we believe in these core values, your mileage may vary on other issues" without causing that divisiveness that you describe.
  6. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    In other words, the notion that a party must have a stance on *every* aspect of life is misguided and creates ideological cattle prodding.
  7. channingcrowderhungry
    Offline

    channingcrowderhungry Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    4,832
    Likes Received:
    162
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Ratings Received:
    +712
    While I personally agree with you, I don't think that would work on the general populous. Your'e
    asking people to think critically and form their own opinions on things.

    Plus there are certain political sects that would never vote for a pro-choice candidate, for example. They would probably abstain or vote for the GOP candidate, even if every other viewpoint line up with the TP candidate. It's a bummer, but I think a lot of people are hard wired that one. I'd be curious what a lot of self described Christian TPers on this board would do with a viable TP presidential candidate that was pro-choice.
  8. wcj786
    Offline

    wcj786 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,304
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings Received:
    +181
    You know what's so damn funny about all the liberals on here? They still think that the Tea Party is composed of ultra-conservative people and don't realize that BOTH political parties had people that were (and still are) members of the Tea Party.

    The Tea Party started because of OBAMACARE!!! There are many in this nation on both sides of the political spectrum that saw how bad this would be for the country. They got together and demanded action from their representatives.

    Unfortunately for the Democrats who were (and still are) part of the Tea Party movement, their liberal Democrat representatives failed to represent them and instead pushed that piece of flotsam known as Obamacare through without a single Republican vote.

    Now, all liberals can do is deride the Tea Party and compare it to Hitler, etc. They don't acknowledge the Democrats who were actively participating in the anti-Obamacare rallies the Tea Party held. They also deny that Occupy Wallstreet (really mis-named. It should have been Occupy Everything, as they protested any and everything they could) was the liberal version of the Tea Party.

    The liberals (and everybody who is condemning them) have no clue what they actually even stand for. They just want to denigrate them because most of the time, the Tea Party is against their personal view of how the country should be run. And, the biggest irony is that what pisses the liberals off the most is that they know the Tea Party is right. They just can't admit it and hold on to their socialist utopian mindset.
    • Like Like x 1
  9. orangeblueorangeblue
    Offline

    orangeblueorangeblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    57,079
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +2,879
    Actually, I'd contend that a lot of Republicans also don't understand what the Tea Party stands for, largely because the GOP is attempting to absorb it.
  10. baygator1
    Offline

    baygator1 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    5,019
    Likes Received:
    1,442
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +1,690
    You have it a bit backwards. The ongoing failures of the Republican Party conceived the Tea Party. The party was already 'ruined', just like yours. They are both beholden to the luxuries of the office and special interests.

    Our two party system for some time has failed the American people. They spend most of their time and our money posturing for the next election.
  11. g8orbill
    Offline

    g8orbill Gators VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    70,802
    Likes Received:
    4,487
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Clermont, Fl
    Ratings Received:
    +9,284
    +1

    thanks
  12. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    32,774
    Likes Received:
    2,469
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +4,350
    Bingo!
  13. tim85
    Offline

    tim85 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    4,148
    Likes Received:
    310
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Jacksonville, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,152
    I like what you're saying, obob. Honestly, I don't know how Liberal I really am when it comes to social issues, but I think they're strongly secondary to the things you listed above(government spending, debts, etc). I'm tired of hearing about abortion, gay marriage, etc - it doesn't mean I don't have feelings on them or consider them somewhat important, it's just that, as a whole, the government has higher priorities.

    What would the Tea Party be without the GOP, right now? Essentially the Libertarian Party. I think that's why they're so intent on melting into the GOP, which I think eventually will just become further right - if they don't pull or melt with one of the actual big boy-parties, they'll just be a fringe-party like the Libertarians have been.
  14. CHFG8R
    Offline

    CHFG8R Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    6,547
    Likes Received:
    277
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    St. Augustine, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +1,235
    Very true. They were more in line with true Libratarians. Once the Bachmans and Rubios glommed on, the real TP movement was done. Ironically, the original TPs were, as you say, hostile to both and in that sense, much more radical.
  15. MichiGator2002
    Offline

    MichiGator2002 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    15,869
    Likes Received:
    428
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +1,953
    The real and actual tea party is agnostic on social issues -- but I would still qualify that "social liberalism" is inherently more government-centric and expensive than "social conservatism", so bona fide small government, fiscal conservatives will trend more socially conservative as well. But also more federalist across the board, so even the social liberals would, in theory, be more for more state authority on social issues.

Share This Page