College students answer Common core math question

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by g8orbill, May 15, 2014.

1. Offline

philnotfilWell-Known Member

Joined:
Apr 8, 2007
Messages:
12,955
226
Trophy Points:
63
+876
The method of subtraction in the video is not required by common core.

The method of subtraction in the video predates common core.

Common core doesn't mandate that only one method of subtraction be taught.

Common core encourages teaching several different methods of subtraction and making sure that students know when to use which one.

corestandards.org

There are valid concerns with common core, particularly the K-3 standards, but, unfortunately, very little of what gets brought up when discussing common core is actually related to common core. For example, this entire thread.
• Informative x 2
• Agree x 1
• Useful x 1
2. Offline

chemgatorWell-Known Member

Joined:
Apr 3, 2007
Messages:
8,893
273
Trophy Points:
83
+1,334
If children are learning something for the first time, don't you think it could be confusing to teach multiple ways to solve a problem before they fully understand at least one of the methods? Isn't there a chance that the proven, successful method would get diluted and washed out by all the extra information that the child can't understand?
• Agree x 1
3. Offline

orangeblueorangeblueWell-Known Member

Joined:
Apr 8, 2007
Messages:
57,052
595
Trophy Points:
113
+2,878
Read the article - it's optional methodology.

I think, from a comprehension standpoint, the "more confusing" method actually teaches you a bit more about why you get what you get. The "old way" is sort of a shorthand trick, really.
• Agree x 1
• Funny x 1
4. Offline

shelbygt350Well-Known Member

Joined:
Apr 3, 2007
Messages:
5,679
228
Trophy Points:
63
+870
Ok, maybe we can actually test old fashioned vs recent (past 20 - 25 yrs) education (not just common core):

(1) go into a store with intent to pay cash, wait till it is rung up, hand clerk paper money, wait till they input that round dollar bill amount, then say, wait, I have some change, and give them the odd change (eg \$17.42 bill, hand them \$20 bill, then hand them 2 quarters and 2 pennies).

(2) go find a relatively recent college graduate in American History. Tell them you love American History. Ask them what they thought of the books by Anna Reed on Washington, Joseph Plumb Martin on Rev War, and any others written say pre 1900. See if you get dumbfounded look.

(3) when talking to an attorney under the age of 35, ask them how was their course in law school on the US Constitution? Mostly likely not taken (not required anymore).

(4) when talking to a public school teacher, ask them how would they like to have a class of 40-50 kids ? Watch the horror in their face then listen to the answer.

(5) in hiring a potential employee, take them to a private room, give them a pen and legal pad, tell them they have 10 minutes to write all the reasons they want to come to work for your firm. Then come back in 8 minutes and read (if you can) the reasons.

The above will illustrate (A) the inability to do simple math in head (which is good for the brain, yes we love calculators), (B) the lack of knowledge of those who wrote first hand accounts and experiences (C) the lack of knowledge of US Const by legal profession (they rely on "precedence"), (D) the lack of parenting and discipline in homes and (E) the inability to communicate (maybe this post is an example ! Ha Ha).
• Winner x 3
5. Offline

Gatorrick22Well-Known Member

Joined:
Apr 3, 2007
Messages:
35,032
2,841
Trophy Points:
113
+6,029
Does the common core teach the times tables? I know that's a shortcut, but aren't shortcuts supposed to be like learning important things. Things like school rules, do-s, don't-s, and other regulations for school? And lets not forget that learning history is pure memorization.
6. Offline

Gatorrick22Well-Known Member

Joined:
Apr 3, 2007
Messages:
35,032
2,841
Trophy Points:
113
+6,029

A "trick"? So learning history or anything from the past is a "trick" now? Do they teach that "trick" in school still?
7. Offline

orangeblueorangeblueWell-Known Member

Joined:
Apr 8, 2007
Messages:
57,052
595
Trophy Points:
113
+2,878
No, it's a trick because it gets you to the solution without you fully understanding how or why.

And yes, they absolutely use it and it's apparently included in Common Core as well.
8. Offline

orangeblueorangeblueWell-Known Member

Joined:
Apr 8, 2007
Messages:
57,052
595
Trophy Points:
113
+2,878
http://www.usnews.com/news/special-...n-core-math-standards-content-and-controversy
9. Offline

Gatorrick22Well-Known Member

Joined:
Apr 3, 2007
Messages:
35,032
2,841
Trophy Points:
113
+6,029

So... you're saying that this faux AGW is a trick?
10. Offline

Gatorrick22Well-Known Member

Joined:
Apr 3, 2007
Messages:
35,032
2,841
Trophy Points:
113
+6,029
I think, therefore I am... 1=1
11. Offline

orangeblueorangeblueWell-Known Member

Joined:
Apr 8, 2007
Messages:
57,052
595
Trophy Points:
113
+2,878
A. I have no idea how this applies. Like not even a little bit.

B. Yes, I've stated many times that I don't think climate change is man-made
12. Offline

Gatorrick22Well-Known Member

Joined:
Apr 3, 2007
Messages:
35,032
2,841
Trophy Points:
113
+6,029

Lol!
13. Offline

orangeblueorangeblueWell-Known Member

Joined:
Apr 8, 2007
Messages:
57,052
595
Trophy Points:
113
+2,878
You start drinking early today?
14. Offline

chemgatorWell-Known Member

Joined:
Apr 3, 2007
Messages:
8,893
273
Trophy Points:
83
+1,334
I understand that it's optional. But teachers may feel pressured to use it, especially if their principal decides to tell them to use it. Children need to start their education with something simple, like memorization. It's what they are best at. If you don't believe me, use an obscene word in front of your 4-year-old and see how many repetitions that it takes before your child uses it in the correct context in a sentence. Then see how long you regret saying that word in front of your child. When it comes to recognizing patterns and developing a deeper understanding of how math works, that will come in time. Some children will learn it on their own, and some will wait until a teacher in a later grade (or a parent, or another kid) spells it out for them. In the early years, we should take advantage of children's sponge-like ability to memorize things, and then work on confusing them (and teaching them to think for themselves) later. The risk of having confused, stressed-out children who can't do simple math and actually hate math is just too great.

Elementary school students are not little college students with dumbed-down curricula.
15. Offline

GatormbWell-Known Member

Joined:
Apr 3, 2007
Messages:
9,413
387
Trophy Points:
83
Location:
+1,210
16. Offline

vaxcardinalWell-Known Member

Joined:
Apr 8, 2007
Messages:
3,754
501
Trophy Points:
113
+796
calculators dont care whether you use common core or not
17. Offline

orangeblueorangeblueWell-Known Member

Joined:
Apr 8, 2007
Messages:
57,052
595
Trophy Points:
113
+2,878
I'm not sure I follow - smaller kids will still learn this to start and then begin to learn how it works.
18. Offline

chemgatorWell-Known Member

Joined:
Apr 3, 2007
Messages:
8,893
273
Trophy Points:
83
+1,334
Except they aren't learning it. They are breaking down crying and deciding they don't like math anymore.

I can't think of anything worse for the future of the U.S. than to have large numbers of children decide they hate mathematics. (Well, besides maybe having Obama "serve" a third term.) We had a simple system for teaching children math, and it worked. Then we switched systems, to the point that even the children's parents cannot understand it, and now children hate the subject. This is a clear case of school administration "creativity" that spends your tax dollars and not only does not provide any value, it destroys value. It reminds me of our neighbor's experience with Head Start (their three-year-old was taught Chinese at home and spoke no English, so her Head Start instructors yelled lessons at her in English every day until she cried). Democrats: paying more to torture children for their own good.
19. Offline

g8orbillGatorsVIP Member

Joined:
Apr 3, 2007
Messages:
73,736
5,339
Trophy Points:
113
Location:
Clermont, Fl
+11,570
I read the article and have talked to the 2 teachers who are my neighbors and have read numerous other articles- I find Common Core concerning- it talks about teaching students critical thinking but then when you read the way certain sections are written it has a decidedly liberal slant- it seems to me that it is pushing students to arrive at the particular finding they want- and it does not seem to spend much time on Civics, American History or the Constitution-yes it is in the reading but there is no real break down to help kids understand how our guvment is "supposed" to work.
20. Offline

Joined:
Apr 8, 2007
Messages:
12,955