A Fascinating Report from the Government Accountability Office

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by FoxGator, Sep 4, 2013.

  1. FoxGator
    Offline

    FoxGator Sly as a Fox Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    992
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings Received:
    +126
    A Fascinating Report from the Government Accountability Office: The bureaucracy’s analysis of green jobs leaves a lot to be desired.

    This is madness!
  2. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    34,998
    Likes Received:
    2,835
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +5,998
  3. rivergator
    Online

    rivergator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    32,634
    Likes Received:
    453
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +2,364
    So you're saying that the money in a training program was spent for training?
  4. gatordowneast
    Offline

    gatordowneast Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    11,730
    Likes Received:
    302
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +984
    I think he is saying that hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars were spent on training for "green jobs" that weren't green.

    Next the administration will be counting golf course and lawn maintenance jobs as "green jobs".
  5. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    34,998
    Likes Received:
    2,835
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +5,998
    Let me put it this way. How many permanent private sector jobs were created with the trillion dollars Obama absconded with?
  6. rivergator
    Online

    rivergator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    32,634
    Likes Received:
    453
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +2,364
    neither of the last two comments have absolutely anything to do with the issue raised in OP. the original complaint is that 84 percent of a training fund was spent on training.
  7. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    34,998
    Likes Received:
    2,835
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +5,998


    It's a pattern, so it's related.
  8. FoxGator
    Offline

    FoxGator Sly as a Fox Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    992
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings Received:
    +126
    This problem is that 84% of the money was spend on jobs that do not produce a product that people want, in other words, they consume wealth rather than create wealth.
  9. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    34,998
    Likes Received:
    2,835
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +5,998
    And that's the pattern of Obama's government waste of the taxpayers wealth and money... on the premise of creating self-sustaining, high-paying, renewable energy, green jobs... he wastes other people's money on shams, and he never delivers on what he says he's going to do.. He's a Con-man.
  10. rivergator
    Online

    rivergator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    32,634
    Likes Received:
    453
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +2,364
    It doesn't appear that the purpose of the program was simply to pay the payroll for companies. It was a training program. You may object to it being a training program, but don't act like you've stumbled on some outrage because a training program spent its money on training.
  11. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    34,998
    Likes Received:
    2,835
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +5,998
    You need to go back and read the article. You'll be shocked at what you glean.

    I wrote about this very subject on another thread.
    ^^^ Not so "green" is it? ^^^
  12. rivergator
    Online

    rivergator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    32,634
    Likes Received:
    453
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +2,364
    OK, so the guy thinks green energy is a bad idea.
  13. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    34,998
    Likes Received:
    2,835
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +5,998
    And read this, River. Green jobs are a semantics trick used to scam the public at large out of huge amounts of wealth.

  14. rivergator
    Online

    rivergator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    32,634
    Likes Received:
    453
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +2,364
    I'm sure there are lots of inconsistencies in every labeling system. So what does that mean, we shouldn't even try to move toward a more sustainable world and economy?
  15. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    34,998
    Likes Received:
    2,835
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +5,998
    No he thinks it's a misnomer, and not many of these green jobs are really "green." In many cases not at all. If you sweep the floor of a building that has an energy rating that puts it in a green category then that sweeper has a "green" job... scam.
  16. rivergator
    Online

    rivergator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    32,634
    Likes Received:
    453
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings Received:
    +2,364
    see my response above.
  17. Gatorrick22
    Offline

    Gatorrick22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    34,998
    Likes Received:
    2,835
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings Received:
    +5,998
    Some green tech is great, if it makes a profit on it's own without the government having to kill the competition just to make it feasible through government coercion and mandates purposely designed to make artificial inflation run rampant throughout the United States and the world... no.

Share This Page