Sure, but why would you ever use the rankings of some individual site, when there is a website that has already provided you with a better composite ranking. And if you are going to use just one site, the disreputable ESPN is maybe the worst site to use on any subject. That goes for sports or anything else. They do not really cover sports, they push an agenda usually based on what ever they happen to be airing. You are right he did jump up out of the blue in the rankings. Still to put him 6th, you are saying he is better than two of Wiggins, Randle, Parker, Gordon, Vonleh, C.Walker, Hill. I can not see it myself.