just so you are aware, you aren't going to get much response from liberals using O'Reilly
these talking heads, whom have clear biases and individual and corporate agendas, from both sides don't deserve attention
O'Reilly is just spouting Republican "general nonsense" talking points
Case in point, the interview right after his talking points
Oh and I love his line about "Obama is only interested in destroying the Republican Party and doesn't care if the economy gets taken down with it"......talk about transference
just so you are aware, you aren't going to get much response from liberals using O'Reilly
these talking heads, whom have clear biases and individual and corporate agendas, from both sides don't deserve attention
O'Reilly is just spouting Republican "general nonsense" talking points
Case in point, the interview right after his talking points
Oh and I love his line about "Obama is only interested in destroying the Republican Party and doesn't care if the economy gets taken down with it"......talk about transference
Very amusing. She ate his lunch and then said she was going to hang around for his supper and dessert. He does much better talking by himself to a camera or screaming over top his guests.
Thats rich...love the reference to bush to deflect blame from BO....you don't know that (same amount as Bush). At least guys like me and Bill have stated Bush spent like a druken sailor while no one has held BO accountable. What we DO know is Obama said it would go DOWN in his term and it hasn't......but rather it has expanded exponetially.
"Today I am pledging to cut the deficit we inherited in half by the end of my first term in office. Now, this will not be easy. It will require us to make difficult decisions and face challenges we've long neglected. But I refuse to leave our children with a debt that they cannot repay, and that means taking responsibility right now, in this administration, for getting our spending under control."
So what you are implying is that despite BO saying he would lower it by half (another unkept promise), that he's actually done well just keeping it to ± $7T in four years?
[quote=108;6453552]that would be the same amount as Bush /QUOTE]
Thats rich...love the reference to bush to deflect blame from BO....you don't know that (same amount as Bush). At least guys like me and Bill have stated Bush spent like a druken sailor while no one has held BO accountable. What we DO know is Obama said it would go DOWN in his term and it hasn't......but rather it has expanded exponetially.
So what you are implying is that despite BO saying he would lower it (another unkept promise), that he's actually done well just keeping it to ± $7T in four years?
What's rich is using a republican talking head to make republican talking points, and expect not to get some criticism
Who cares if he's a Rep or not. It doesn't matter what team he plays for...the point is he's right about the current debt being "too high," which you agree with. Everyone, REP/DEM/INDEP should be ashamed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 108
What's rich is using a republican talking head to make republican talking points, and expect not to get some criticism
Who cares if he's a Rep or not. It doesn't matter what team he plays for...the point is he's right about the current debt being "too high," which you agree with. Everyone, REP/DEM/INDEP should be ashamed.
No, his "point" was that Allen Colmes was lying when he said Obama had offered specifics on cutting entitlements. The follow up interview with the woman is embarrassing evidence of how little O'Reilly knows and how much less he even cares.
Yes, he was making that point too which lead to the MUCH larger, salient point of the whole memo about our OOC deficit (projected to be ± $20T at the end of BO presidency) and how BO has done nothing to reduce it by half which he said he would do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Row6
No, his "point" was that Allen Colmes was lying when he said Obama had offered specifics on cutting entitlements. The follow up interview with the woman is embarrassing evidence of how little O'Reilly knows and how much less he even cares.
I really wish FOX could afford to stop all television for 5 minutes. Put their man Bill O'Reilly on every channel for those 5 minutes and let him say exactly what he said. The problem is..... NOT MANY AMERICANS WATCH FOX NEWS AND BILL O'REILLY!!!!!!!!!! Do it and get it over with, what he said what perfectly said. You can't say it any better end of story!
oh and she didn't eat anyone's lunch. Bill was 100% correct in that Obama has given crap for a real plan to lower debt. He has offered no plan that merits and intellectual thought in which we can take it serious. Why do people cover for this guy as if he has done us so well!?!?
Is that the same Bill O'Reilly who called Colmes a liar for saying that Obama had proposed spending cuts, when Obama had proposed spending cuts?
When I first saw O'Reilly on TV, I figured he must be right. No one would be that adamant without being right. Then I realized he's often wrong, even when he's blustering and claiming he's right.
that would be the same amount as Bush but with a massive recession that has made up the majority of it, including many carry over programs
its boggles my mind how O'Reilly could just brush over the $10 trillion when Obama came into office with a straight face
that was in relative economic prosperity
Bush left us 10.5 T in debt not all was his spending, and BO will leave us 20 T in debt..... 10 Trillion was his spending, yet you still blame Bush. That has to be some sort of mental disorder to conflate the two amounts.
Enough
. 
Linear Mode
