Colorado coming after shotguns

[HudsonGator]

Originally Posted by gatorman_07732

It was a point to show how foolish your post was, and yes you're entitled to your opinions but it doesn't make them plausible.

So much vitriol. Two words of advice: seek therapy

[gatorman_07732]

Originally Posted by HudsonGator

So much vitriol. Two words of advice: seek therapy

No vitriol whatsoever in that post. It sounds like you can't deal with logic.

[HALLGATOR]

Originally Posted by Lawdog88

And let me guess, in your day, you were obligated to miss with the first shot, to give the game "a sporting chance."

My father, who was one of the better shot I have ever been around, was given two boxes of shells at the time by his father. In order to get more he had to show at least one bird, squirrel or whatever for every shot he fired. His favorite squirrel gun was a single shot .22 rifle and felt that was the sporting way to hunt the critters.

[GatorMid]

In the am, I'm headed out to shoot snow geese....no plugs required, and mag extensions allowed. I could only find an 8 shot extension tube due to the hysteria, but I hope to make it rain with it.

But on topic, this is exactly why there will be major resistance among sporting folks...it starts with "assault rifles" , but the gun control freaks will not stop there.

[Gatorrick22]

Originally Posted by MichiGator2002

As always, one must point out that "hunting isn't affected" is a pointless argument, since hunting is an incidental, ancillary right under the 2nd Amendment, the point and purpose being about self-defense from state and non-state actors.

No, you're trying to make the Second Amendment Rights "ancillary" and "pointless".

[MichiGator2002]

Originally Posted by Gatorrick22

No, you're trying to make the Second Amendment Rights "ancillary" and "pointless".

Probably misunderstanding my point and/or have never read any other post of mine on the second amendment ever.

[Minister_of_Information]

Originally Posted by Gatorrick22

No, you're trying to make the Second Amendment Rights "ancillary" and "pointless".

?

[Minister_of_Information]

Originally Posted by MichiGator2002

As always, one must point out that "hunting isn't affected" is a pointless argument, since hunting is an incidental, ancillary right under the 2nd Amendment, the point and purpose being about self-defense from state and non-state actors.

Right, and doing so collaboratively with others with arms that permit at least a basic level of infantry tactics. You can't provide suppressive or covering fire with a muzzle loader.

[HudsonGator]

Originally Posted by Minister_of_Information

Right, and doing so collaboratively with others with arms that permit at least a basic level of infantry tactics.

That I would like see from the folks on this board.

[chemgator]

Originally Posted by Lawdog88

And let me guess, in your day, you were obligated to miss with the first shot, to give the game "a sporting chance."

You were supposed to count to three to allow the game a chance to shoot back.

[Minister_of_Information]

Originally Posted by HudsonGator

That I would like see from the folks on this board.

I sincerely hope you never do.

[JohnC1908]

Originally Posted by cocodrilo

A shot a bird with a bb gun when I was about 10 years old. I gave it a funeral and have never gotten over it.

In fifth grade I'd walk about a mile to school every morning. There were some birds that would sit on a telephone wire about 50 feet up. Everyday I'd throw a few rocks up there never really expecting to hit one. One day I nailed one and over he fell. I cried for a good half hour and spent the whole day hating myself.

[gatorman_07732]

Originally Posted by JohnC1908

In fifth grade I'd walk about a mile to school every morning. There were some birds that would sit on a telephone wire about 50 feet up. Everyday I'd throw a few rocks up there never really expecting to hit one. One day I nailed one and over he fell. I cried for a good half hour and spent the whole day hating myself.

That is entirely normal for a child because there is a thinking process there that does not go all the way through. I bet however your feelings would be reversed should have one crapped on you. Just saying, I've been on the receiving end.

[HudsonGator]

Originally Posted by Minister_of_Information

I sincerely hope you never do.

Yes, it would be quite tragic for them, silly buggers, running around pretending to be soldiers, people get hurt that way.

[Minister_of_Information]

Originally Posted by HudsonGator

Yes, it would be quite tragic for them, silly buggers, running around pretending to be soldiers, people get hurt that way.

Nah, most of that will be left to the real soldiers, ex-soldiers, LE oathkeepers, and other trained security professionals who support the 2A. Participating civilians will mostly just provide supply, intelligence, concealment / friendly bivouac sites, and a source of recruitment as needed. And a great many others will do nothing other than refuse to cooperate with the authorities. The net effect will be impossible to overcome.

[Dreamliner]

Guns, EUUUUUUUU! If you hold a gun, it's liable to just go off and kill somebody! Either that or the guy who breaks into your house will just snatch the gun out of your hands and shoot you with your own gun! EUUUUUUU!

[bluelang]

What part of "you can keep the gun" implies "we're taking the gun from you?"

[Gatorrick22]

Originally Posted by bluelang

What part of "you can keep the gun" implies "we're taking the gun from you?"

Same as "what part of" Obama care was supposed to cut health insurance rates for us all...... It was just a lie to get what they wanted. They say they're not taking guns from you but first they have to make it impossible to get by limiting access, then the just start eliminating period.


We've seen this trickle-down BS the Dems have tried to feed us before.

[Tasselhoff]

Originally Posted by bluelang

What part of "you can keep the gun" implies "we're taking the gun from you?"

"If you have insurance you like, you can keep it"....oh wait....

[northgagator]

Originally Posted by chemgator

You were supposed to count to three to allow the game a chance to shoot back.

Reminds of an old South Park episode. "There coming at me, BANG"