$200/year? Seems pretty slow really. Barely outpacing inflation, most likely. Hardly outrageous. Definitely not thread worthy. Going down $2,000/year would be better, but I'm not seeing anything noteworthy here.
__________________
.
There was nothin to set a man's mind at ease like wakin up in the morning and not havin to decide who you were.
while were at it, lets forget there was a massive recession that forced Gov to spend and reduce its revenue to offset it by artificially creating demand, since the private sector is no where to be found
while were at it, lets forget there was a massive recession that forced Gov to spend and reduce its revenue to offset it by artificially creating demand, since the private sector is no where to be found
In your opinion would this recession have occurred regardless of who was in office? You have to ask yourself if the only course pursued just happened to be the easiest but not necessarily the best.
while were at it, lets forget there was a massive recession that forced Gov to spend and reduce its revenue to offset it by artificially creating demand, since the private sector is no where to be found
I thought it was the Bush tax cuts that crushed the revenue stream to the Feds?
You know the ones that stole from the poor to give to millionaires and billionaires.
In your opinion would this recession have occurred regardless of who was in office? You have to ask yourself if the only course pursued just happened to be the easiest but not necessarily the best.
Still not sure how much slack to cut Obama here.
i have to think if there were a more competent individual in the WH between 00-08, they may have not allowed it to get to the point of coming down like it did
but he started and ended his presidency with a bang justifying it by "events that nobody could foresee"
i have to think if there were a more competent individual in the WH between 00-08, they may have not allowed it to get to the point of coming down like it did
but he started and ended his presidency with a bang justifying it by "events that nobody could foresee"
LOL
Well I hate to think what your thoughts on Obama's competence are.
__________________
"He never bitched, never moaned," Muschamp says. "He is the greatest example of a team player I've been around as a football coach."
- Will Muschamp on Mike Gillislee
i have to think if there were a more competent individual in the WH between 00-08, they may have not allowed it to get to the point of coming down like it did
but he started and ended his presidency with a bang justifying it by "events that nobody could foresee"
Wasn't it Obama who said 6-9 months after the crash in 08 "It was much worse than we knew"?
Even with that much hindsight his greatness had trouble seeing it......
$200/year? Seems pretty slow really. Barely outpacing inflation, most likely. Hardly outrageous. Definitely not thread worthy. Going down $2,000/year would be better, but I'm not seeing anything noteworthy here.
You obviously don't understand economics too well. Two hundred dollars a year per person is a lot of money. But its not really about the amount of money, its the fact that each person has less money to spend on something they'd like to have. Basically the government has redirected trillions of dollars into things that people wouldn't wanted to buy for themselves. In other words, government has forced inefficiency in goods and services market. Think about what you could have bought for yourself for 200 in any given year. A new toaster? Microwave? Car tires? Instead, you got nothing for your $200/year, at least not something you wanted anyway. The bottom line here is that there are unseen unintended consequences. Other industries that have now sold sell goods and services because they aren't getting people's $200 anymore are going to get hurt.
You obviously don't understand economics too well. Two hundred dollars a year per person is a lot of money. But its not really about the amount of money, its the fact that each person has less money to spend on something they'd like to have. Basically the government has redirected trillions of dollars into things that people wouldn't wanted to buy for themselves. In other words, government has forced inefficiency in goods and services market. Think about what you could have bought for yourself for 200 in any given year. A new toaster? Microwave? Car tires? Instead, you got nothing for your $200/year, at least not something you wanted anyway. The bottom line here is that there are unseen unintended consequences. Other industries that have now sold sell goods and services because they aren't getting people's $200 anymore are going to get hurt.
Thanks for the economics lesson, professor.
The US laid out $3.7T in 2012. With 138 million taxpayers, pardon me if I don't get my panties in a wad over 200 bucks.
__________________
.
There was nothin to set a man's mind at ease like wakin up in the morning and not havin to decide who you were.
The citizens have less money that is worth a lot less. But hey at least Uncle Sam gets to pay off his irresponsible debt that has gotten us squat with increasingly worthless dollars