Hillary clinton sexiest woman of the 21st century!

[CHFG8R]

Originally Posted by wgbgator

I'm not generally attracted to women over 30 years older than me, so I cant tell you what's sexy about Hillary now. Maybe Bill can, or other dudes around her age looking through the eyes of an older man.

But I've seen pictures of her back in the day, she wasnt model pretty, but she was far from "disgusting." I wouldnt have turned it down. Maybe I just like nerdy girls. But that's my opinion. That neither confirms or disproves her sexiness. As I said, its entirely subjective.

I agree with this completely. But I also have a thing for nerdy girls.

[CHFG8R]

http://www.google.com/imgres?num=10&...,r:6,s:0,i:169

[Row6]

Originally Posted by wygator

Was any female politician, ever, assailed more on her appearance than Florida's own Katherine Harris? Cruella DeVille was one of the kinder insults she received.

How won dresses or makes themselves up - Boehner's tan or Biden's plugs - is of a different order than mocking their unchangeable physical attributes.

[Row6]

Originally Posted by orangeblueorangeblue

Hassle river about examples first.

Rush, TH, this and many other threads where republicans demonstrate their low standards. Your turn.

[gatormoe1]

Originally Posted by Row6

How won dresses or makes themselves up - Boehner's tan or Biden's plugs - is of a different order than mocking their unchangeable physical attributes.

Now you're making rules of how one can be made fun of? Wow, this guy...

[CHFG8R]

Originally Posted by Row6

Rush, TH, this and many other threads where republicans demonstrate their low standards. Your turn.

What color is the sky in Myopiaville?

[orangeblueorangeblue]

Originally Posted by Row6

Rush, TH, this and many other threads where republicans demonstrate their low standards. Your turn.

Wait, weren't you the one demanding specific examples??

[orangeblueorangeblue]

I mean if things like that count as specific, Maher called both Bachmann and Palin "bimbos."

[orangeblueorangeblue]

He also called Palin the C-word. Olbermann called Palin an "idiot." These, I guess, are not low standards and don't count. Only the other side.

[orangeblueorangeblue]

This also doesn't count, I guess:

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/keith-olb...terens-speech/

Nah, only when the Pubs do it.

[CHFG8R]

Originally Posted by orangeblueorangeblue

He also called Palin the C-word. Olbermann called Palin an "idiot." These, I guess, are not low standards and don't count. Only the other side.

'Tis the way things work in Myopiaville. Amazing how blinded by partisanship some people are. Can't even see how silly they sound through all the rhetorical haze.

[orangeblueorangeblue]

No, no. Only the Pubs do disgusting things like that. The Dems are above it. Except when they aren't. But let's not count those times.

[Row6]

Originally Posted by orangeblueorangeblue

He also called Palin the C-word. Olbermann called Palin an "idiot." These, I guess, are not low standards and don't count. Only the other side.

Maher is a known shock-comic whose show airs once a week for about half of the year on paid cable. Rush is on nationally every weekday and features callers mostly agreeing with him while the small sample on TH confirms the prevalence of these poor manners by all too many right wingers. I'd like to see the posts from the left mocking Barbara or Laura Bush for their attractiveness. Calling someone an idiot is entirely different matter and I'm sure you know that.

[CHFG8R]

I find myself amazed by just the involuntary nature of the reaction. Blind defense of party is like breathing to these people.

[orangeblueorangeblue]

Originally Posted by Row6

Maher is a known shock-comic whose show airs once a week for about half of the year on paid cable. Rush is on nationally every weekday and features callers mostly agreeing with him while the small sample on TH confirms the prevalence of these poor manners by all too many right wingers. I'd like to see the posts from the left mocking Barbara or Laura Bush for their attractiveness. Calling someone an idiot is entirely different matter and I'm sure you know that.

Ah yes. In short, Maher and Olbemann don't count, Rush does.

Gotcha. Confirms my suspicion.

[CHFG8R]

Look! He's still at it.

WOW!

[orangeblueorangeblue]

"Examples, please! (so I can completely disregard them)"

[wgbgator]

If there is a partisan difference that I could point to, it would be the idea of attractiveness. The supposed sex appeal of Palin/Bachmann, etc vs. the supposed unattractiveness of Pelosi, Clinton, etc. The nastly stuff is framed a little differently. I'm not sure you could measure who, is "more" guilty. It really doesnt matter. I think female politicians of all stripes get treated differently than men based on their looks, of that, there is no doubt.

[orangeblueorangeblue]

I really don't think any of them are attractive, but like I said they're all older women and that's sort of the nature of the sexual beast. Maybe when I get older they might have more appeal.

But for that very reason I wouldn't go calling any of them hideous or ugly or whatever. They're older women. I also don't doubt that plenty of Dems have made awful, disparaging remarks about the female Pub leaders and that plenty of Pubs have done similarly. To pretend that one side is inherently "better" or "worse" is idiotic.

[CHFG8R]

Originally Posted by wgbgator

If there is a partisan difference that I could point to, it would be the idea of attractiveness. The supposed sex appeal of Palin/Bachmann, etc vs. the supposed unattractiveness of Pelosi, Clinton, etc. The nastly stuff is framed a little differently. I'm not sure you could measure who, is "more" guilty. It really doesnt matter. I think female politicians of all stripes get treated differently than men based on their looks, of that, there is no doubt.

Let me fix this for you.

I think females of all stripes get treated differently than men based on their looks, of that, there is no doubt.

That's called nature. And to be honest, the feminist wing of the (D)s is just as guilty of (below) with their equally unrealistic stand on this.

If there is a partisan difference that I could point to, it would be the idea of attractiveness.