01-10-2013, 11:17 PM
|
#41
|
|
Heisman Winner
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,817
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noahtogo24
And Kentucky escapes with the win.
|
The way they fell apart down the stretch against a bad Vandy team shouldn't make them feel very confident.
They don't seem like they've improved a lot since I watched them last month.
|
|
|
01-10-2013, 11:17 PM
|
#42
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 35,488
|
Kentucky 3-17 from behind the arc
|
|
|
01-10-2013, 11:18 PM
|
#43
|
|
Heisman Candidate
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,129
|
Awful game. Should be in overtime. Kentucky ends up getting to call it a win but its far from a good sign.
Haha, how about Bobby Knight not understanding the shot/game clock though! He's losing it. Thought he had some good points along the way, but just like UK, couldn't put together a full 40 minutes.
|
|
|
01-10-2013, 11:20 PM
|
#44
|
|
Heisman Winner
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,817
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CASontag
I'm surprised the rebounds are essentially equal between both teams. Thought UK's length would have given them more of a rebounding edge vs. Vandy.
|
Vandy's bigs are not athletic. The one big got the ball in great position in front of the basket and was such a wimp, he passed it out.
The fact that UK's bigs were unable to dominate those guys is not a great sign.
|
|
|
01-10-2013, 11:22 PM
|
#45
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,125
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by REM08
Vandy got screwed on the no call for shot clock violation.
|
Why did the officails not take a look and see if the shot got off on time? Maybe because it was Kentucky?
|
|
|
01-10-2013, 11:23 PM
|
#46
|
|
Premium Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,230
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GolphinGator
Why did the officails not take a look and see if the shot got off on time? Maybe because it was Kentucky?
|
Shot clock violation isn't reviewable.
|
|
|
01-10-2013, 11:24 PM
|
#47
|
|
Heisman Winner
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,817
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GolphinGator
Why did the officails not take a look and see if the shot got off on time? Maybe because it was Kentucky?
|
Considering the crap that they have let Stallings get away with (holding the ball from Noah) in the past, I'm suprised that they didn't give in and take another look at it.
Nothing worse than giving a crybaby like Stallings something legitimate to gripe about.
|
|
|
01-10-2013, 11:27 PM
|
#48
|
|
Heisman Winner
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,817
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by REM08
Awful game. Should be in overtime. Kentucky ends up getting to call it a win but its far from a good sign.
Haha, how about Bobby Knight not understanding the shot/game clock though! He's losing it. Thought he had some good points along the way, but just like UK, couldn't put together a full 40 minutes.
|
Knight brought up some good points about why UK was struggling against Vandy's zone and also some of the things that Vandy was failing to do on offense.
Kentucky just doesn't look like a very smart team right now. It almost got them beat tonight against a team that is several levels below them in the talent department. Cal has his work cut out with them to get them to play smarter.
|
|
|
01-10-2013, 11:33 PM
|
#49
|
|
Heisman Candidate
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,129
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommyuf21
Knight brought up some good points about why UK was struggling against Vandy's zone and also some of the things that Vandy was failing to do on offense.
Kentucky just doesn't look like a very smart team right now. It almost got them beat tonight against a team that is several levels below them in the talent department. Cal has his work cut out with them to get them to play smarter.
|
Yeah I agree. This didn't look like Cal's best night either. I'm all for letting young kids play through struggles sometimes, but after 4 minutes of not scoring against the zone I think some more timeouts were in order. We're usually better than that against a zone. Poythress is source of frustration also.
|
|
|
01-10-2013, 11:34 PM
|
#50
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 35,488
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oragator1
Shot clock violation isn't reviewable.
|
That sounds like it needs to be looked at.
|
|
|
01-11-2013, 04:53 AM
|
#51
|
|
Heisman Finalist
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,333
|
so after one game out of 18, did anyone look like NCAA tournament material besides Florida, Missouri and Ole Miss?
|
|
|
01-11-2013, 06:22 AM
|
#52
|
|
Respected Rival
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 8,578
|
The best thing about the Vandy game is, is that it is over!! A win on the road is great but we have tons of work to do.
|
|
|
01-11-2013, 07:51 AM
|
#53
|
|
Heisman Winner
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,817
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oneatatime
so after one game out of 18, did anyone look like NCAA tournament material besides Florida, Missouri and Ole Miss?
|
Not really. I think we're a three bid conference, unless we get a suprise in March.
|
|
|
01-11-2013, 08:56 AM
|
#54
|
|
Heisman Candidate
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,129
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommyuf21
Not really. I think we're a three bid conference, unless we get a suprise in March.
|
I'll take that bet. Can't believe all the comments I see about UK not even making the tournament. I am not calling for a 3 seed or anything. But a 10? Really, you don't see that happening? Remember, teams are never as good as they look or as bad as they look. Somewhere in the middle is a lower seed tourney team for UK. Pick your terms.
|
|
|
01-11-2013, 09:03 AM
|
#55
|
|
Respected Rival
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 8,578
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oneatatime
so after one game out of 18, did anyone look like NCAA tournament material besides Florida, Missouri and Ole Miss?
|
LOL--Kentucky will be just fine--it is a marathon and not a sprint. They will learn to put the screws to a team and not let them back in. We have talent just have to put it all together and it will take time. I will take a win on the road in conference play anytime I can get it.
Jeff
|
|
|
01-11-2013, 09:01 PM
|
#56
|
|
Heisman Winner
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,817
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by REM08
I'll take that bet. Can't believe all the comments I see about UK not even making the tournament. I am not calling for a 3 seed or anything. But a 10? Really, you don't see that happening? Remember, teams are never as good as they look or as bad as they look. Somewhere in the middle is a lower seed tourney team for UK. Pick your terms.
|
I think this is a three bid league, with UF, Missouri an UK making it. I don't think Ole Miss will be there in the end. All three teams should be a five seed or better, but outside of them (unless someone breaks through like the Poodles did a few years back), I don't believe anyone else makes it.
Just my opinion, I'm not staking my reputation to it, nor do I consider myself a psychic either.
|
|
|
01-11-2013, 09:17 PM
|
#57
|
|
Heisman Candidate
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,129
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommyuf21
I think this is a three bid league, with UF, Missouri an UK making it. I don't think Ole Miss will be there in the end. All three teams should be a five seed or better, but outside of them (unless someone breaks through like the Poodles did a few years back), I don't believe anyone else makes it.
Just my opinion, I'm not staking my reputation to it, nor do I consider myself a psychic either.
|
I misunderstood your post apparently. My bad.
|
|
|
01-11-2013, 09:35 PM
|
#58
|
|
Sophomore
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 344
|
Kentucky's only quality win right now is over Maryland. Maryland has an RPI of 87, an SOS of 263, and just lost to a mediocre Florida State team at home. They have one other win versus the Top 200 - Vanderbilt.
People honestly think this team is a lock to make the tournament? Their resume is mediocre at best right now; Ole Miss is probably in better shape than they are at the moment. They'll need a very good conference season to even get in the tournament. They've looked capable of doing so at different times this season, but they won't be able to play on the road like they did last night or they'll pick up some bad losses in conference play. If that happens, you can pencil them into the NIT. Unless, of course, the Selection Committee selects them simply because of their name and the $$$ that they'll bring in.
|
|
|
01-11-2013, 10:03 PM
|
#59
|
|
Heisman Winner
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,817
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by REM08
I misunderstood your post apparently. My bad.
|
I'm partially to blame as I didn't fully read the original post that I initially responded to. I don't believe that Ole Miss would get a third bid over Kentucky. UK has way too much talent and Cal is too good of a coach to not get in. I fully expect them to improve and they should be a fifth seed or better.
I think the conference has a lot of average teams that will beat each other up. We may have an alltime high of NIT teams this year.
My opinion is that the top teams in the league split with each other, with road wins becoming scarce.
It's important to note, even though I don't think much of what we have this year in the SEC, any of these teams can beat you on their home floor if you don't show up. That's why I have maintained that noone will sweep the league this year.
|
|
|
01-12-2013, 06:45 PM
|
#60
|
|
Heisman Candidate
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,323
|
Boy is the first half of UAR and Vandy painful.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|