Thank God Georgia didn't win the SEC championship game

[tommyuf21]

Originally Posted by AmericaFirst

They have two National Championships. Your post reads as if they have zero. As for pure talent, Alabama still has more, IMO. Georgia only had 70 players on scholarship this year. To damn near make it to the MNC game with 70 players on scholarship is a pretty good season, IMO.

32 years since the last one. The other was won during WWII against club teams.

Nothing to brag about.

[CHFG8R]

Originally Posted by AmericaFirst

Then don't ever complain when every kid we're recruiting picks Bama over us. There's no reason to go anywhere else if they're winning in a dynasty-like way.

I don't think you are getting this. If everything is equal (didn't grow up a Gator, no Legacy, etc.) then they are ALREADY GOING TO PICK THEM OVER US! Now, do you want them picking UGa over us too?

Alabama winning changes nothing. UGa winning potentially/likely makes our life more difficult.

Get it?

[tommyuf21]

Originally Posted by AmericaFirst

Then don't ever complain when every kid we're recruiting picks Bama over us. There's no reason to go anywhere else if they're winning in a dynasty-like way.

Bama, for better or for worse, has seen their program return to elite status. That isn't changing until Satan leaves. They are in the West too.

We don't want the Poodles hoisting hardware. We compete for recruits with them on a much more frequent basis.

As for Bama recruiting, they will get theirs, but they have scholarship limits too. They can't sign everyone, witness our 2013 incoming class.

[RattlerGator]

Originally Posted by Gator40

I don't know of one Gator fan that would ever want UGA to win a national title.

Ummmm, I would have preferred them winning this one. It was their turn, essentially, and since I am confident and convinced that Muschamp is building a monster -- hell, let 'em have it. Would have made Florida-Georgia all the better.

[CHFG8R]

Originally Posted by UFLAW81

In the end, Georgia is still Georgia.
Prefer them to Alabama all you want, but they will remain Georgia.
Once again, they are the SEC's beautiful losers.
Only Georgia could foul up clock management in a championship game.
Spike the ball, let the line get set and your quick pick out to the sideline is a TD, not a tipped ball.

Only at Georgia.
When I was a kid, we would hand them a win almost every year, just to watch them screw up against Auburn or UT or Alabama or G-Tech.
But they would brag all year long like those loses never happened.
Beautiful losers.
This year, they may have very well fielded the most talented team in college ball.
Yet, they made it to the championship game because we handed it to them.
Just to watch them screw it all up at the end of the game.
We all know if Georgia wasn't Georgia they would have spiked the ball to get the line set. They would have completed a TD pass to an open receiver and undoubtedly stomped ND for the BCS NC.
But Georgia is Georgia, and they screwed it up.

So here we go again, another year of listening how they "Beat" us, but we know they still won nothing, although they should have.
Beautiful losers.
So don't bother yourself with worrying Alabama won another title. Georgia never had a chance.
Because Georgia is Georgia.
Beautiful losers.

Excellent work my friend.

[CHFG8R]

Originally Posted by AmericaFirst

They have two National Championships. Your post reads as if they have zero. As for pure talent, Alabama still has more, IMO. Georgia only had 70 players on scholarship this year. To damn near make it to the MNC game with 70 players on scholarship is a pretty good season, IMO.

Yeah, but they're still disappointed and pissed off. Which is awesome in my book!

[AmericaFirst]

Originally Posted by CHFG8R

I don't think you are getting this. If everything is equal (didn't grow up a Gator, no Legacy, etc.) then they are ALREADY GOING TO PICK THEM OVER US! Now, do you want them picking UGa over us too?

Alabama winning changes nothing. UGa winning potentially/likely makes our life more difficult.

Get it?

And that's where we disagree. Again, ALABAMA WINNING IN A DYNASTY-LIKE WAY GIVES RECRUITS NO REASON TO GO ANYWHERE ELSE. I'm not sure how you figure "Oh, they're Alabama. They're going to get their championships anyways" somehow makes it better when they're building a dynasty. I'd agree with you if this was title one under Saban but now it's three.



Get that?

[tilly]

Originally Posted by AmericaFirst

Then don't ever complain when every kid we're recruiting picks Bama over us. There's no reason to go anywhere else if they're winning in a dynasty-like way.

Sure...because they all get to play.. and Kids would rather sit the bench than play

Truth is. We have arguably the best recruiting class in the country. So your point is a little flat.

[CHFG8R]

Originally Posted by RattlerGator

Ummmm, I would have preferred them winning this one. It was their turn, essentially, and since I am confident and convinced that Muschamp is building a monster -- hell, let 'em have it. Would have made Florida-Georgia all the better.

1990-1996. Now THAT was Florida/Georgia at its finest!

[tommyuf21]

The only way a Poodle gets to hold the crystal is if they are a silent commit and take an official to UF. See Orson Charles...

It needs to stay that way.

[Swampmaster]

Originally Posted by CHFG8R

1990-1997. Now THAT was Florida/Georgia at its finest!

forget 1997

[twodaparty]

Originally Posted by RattlerGator

Ummmm, I would have preferred them winning this one. It was their turn, essentially, and since I am confident and convinced that Muschamp is building a monster -- hell, let 'em have it. Would have made Florida-Georgia all the better.

Kill yourself ! Not literally but anyone who actually wanted the Leg Humpers to win a championship needs to kill themselves. Either that or be forced to live in the state of georgia surrounded by them. To Hell with georgia!

[CHFG8R]

Originally Posted by AmericaFirst

And that's where we disagree. Again, ALABAMA WINNING IN A DYNASTY-LIKE WAY GIVES RECRUITS NO REASON TO GO ANYWHERE ELSE. I'm not sure how you figure "Oh, they're Alabama. They're going to get their championships anyways" somehow makes it better when they're building a dynasty. I'd agree with you if this was title one under Saban but now it's three.



Get that?

So, you're saying that somehow Alabama is viewed in a more favorable light - by recruits - than they were at this point last year and that, somehow, they are going to present a greater problem for UF in recruiting than if UGa (who we compete with head-to-head for recruits far more often than Alabama) had won the MNC? If so, then we'll just have to agree to disagree.

With respect to UF, at what point in the last 3 seasons have they actually HAD a reason to choose UF over UA (again, throw out legacies, lifetime Gators from Ocala, etc.)?

[oxymoron]

The Dawgs would have carved up the Domer secondary. Bama had guys running wide open through their secondary. The Domers need to recruit some more secondary speed if they plan on winnings NC's. If they had played Oregon it would have looked like a track meet.

[CHFG8R]

Originally Posted by AmericaFirst

And that's where we disagree. Again, ALABAMA WINNING IN A DYNASTY-LIKE WAY GIVES RECRUITS NO REASON TO GO ANYWHERE ELSE. I'm not sure how you figure "Oh, they're Alabama. They're going to get their championships anyways" somehow makes it better when they're building a dynasty. I'd agree with you if this was title one under Saban but now it's three.



Get that?

Oh, and they're well beyond the "building" phase of their dynasty.

[CHFG8R]

Originally Posted by Swampmaster

forget 1997

Garrison Hurst game. Doh!

Corrected.

[tommyuf21]

I don't Hearst ever beat us. He or Zeier.

1997 was Bobo and Edwards.

[AmericaFirst]

Originally Posted by CHFG8R

So, you're saying that somehow Alabama is viewed in a more favorable light - by recruits - than they were at this point last year and that, somehow, they are going to present a greater problem for UF in recruiting than if UGa (who we compete with head-to-head for recruits far more often than Alabama) had won the MNC? If so, then we'll just have to agree to disagree.

With respect to UF, at what point in the last 3 seasons have they actually HAD a reason to choose UF over UA (again, throw out legacies, lifetime Gators from Ocala, etc.)?

We haven't seen a real MNC dynasty since the Bryant days and yeah, it will have a big effect on our recruiting. Even in the 90s, Bama wasn't a dynasty. When you win 3 titles in 4 years, you've got a dynasty. So, yeah, if it means SPREADING the MNCs around the SEC so one team doesn't gobble them up? Yeah, I'd rather see Georgia win one and solidify the SEC as the best all-around conference as opposed to watch Bama win a dozen or so more. They'll be the favorites next year...and the year after that...and the year after that. See what I'm saying?

[tommyuf21]

Originally Posted by AmericaFirst

We haven't seen a real MNC dynasty since the Bryant days and yeah, it will have a big effect on our recruiting. Even in the 90s, Bama wasn't a dynasty. When you win 3 titles in 4 years, you've got a dynasty. So, yeah, if it means SPREADING the MNCs around the SEC so one team doesn't gobble them up? Yeah, I'd rather see Georgia win one and solidify the SEC as the best all-around conference as opposed to watch Bama win a dozen or so more. They'll be the favorites next year...and the year after that...and the year after that. See what I'm saying?

I don't mind Auburn's one purchased title. They didn't garner any momentum from it.

Poodles are not likely to suffer the same fate. Better to keep them from sniffing a title.

[CHFG8R]

Originally Posted by tommyuf21

I don't Hearst ever beat us. He or Zeier.

1997 was Bobo and Edwards.

Ouch. Twice.