Quote:
Originally Posted by VolNation74
What would you expect him to say?
Totally UNREAL how some of you are defending trying to gouge someone's eyes out. Almost unbelievable. BIG difference in sticking your fingers in a man's eyes than a late hit or something. That happens all the time and is not always intentional.
BUT, digging your fingers into someone's eyes IS intentional, its NOT a part of the game in any way. Its the equivalent of Haynesworth stomping on that Cowboy players head a few years ago. Even worse.
If someone had tackled Timmy and started that dirty crap, you guys would be calling for his arrest and imprisonment. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.
|
Whats UNREAL is how many living-room-referees slurp the scum off of the cesspool that is ESPN's journalistic integrity without taking the time to form logical thoughts.
Let's start with the facts:
1) Video clearly shows that Brandon Spikes' hand was inside Ealey's facemask. It wasn't an accident, it didn't slip. Spikes put it there intentionally.
2) That is ALL the video shows. There is no eyeball on the field, no pool of blood.
3) Ealey played the next down. No timeout while trainers had to attend to him, no Visine, nothing.
4) Ealey, not his coach, teammate, girlfriend, grandmother, or even one of his rabid fans, but Ealey, said that Spikes
didn't get near his eyes.
These are the facts of the case, and they are undisputed.
Moving on to logical deductions based on facts. Please remove your Orange and Blue, Creamsicle, or Crimson glasses (or your gently-used black helmets) as you enter the Realm of Intelligent Thought.
You don't know WHAT Spikes was doing with his hand in there. The only actual allusion to intent was when Meyer acknowledged at his "sentencing hearing" that the incident was some form of retaliation. So we can agree that he wasn't picking a piece of spinach out of his teeth. What NOBODY KNOWS based on the video is whether he was wiping Ealey's spit back in his face from the previous play, or he stuck his hand up his butt and was giving him the dirty sanchez, or if he was in fact "gouging" his eyes. So lets examine the rest of the evidence and see if we can narrow down the field...
Can we agree that as Ealey was down after the tackle and was holding onto the ball, Spikes had fairly free access to his facemask? Buckle up kids, because here comes some independent thought (please don't tell ESPN). If A) Spikes intended to gouge Ealey's eyes, and B) Ealey was effectively defenseless to such an attack, then C) Spikes would have been at least moderately successful in his endeavor. Since Ealey did not show even the smallest sign of having experienced eye trauma, and, more importantly, Ealey himself stated that Spikes did not get near his eyes, then the premise that Spikes intended to gouge his eyes out MUST BE FALSE.
Now, once you remove "eye gouging" as a possibility, you're left with a much less compelling argument for Brandon Spikes being executed. You should try going back and watching the whole game instead of super-slow-motion replays of Spikes and Ealey. Count the number of times the ref's jumped in and prevented fights from breaking out. Count the number of helmet slaps, shoves, and late hits that went unnoticed. The ref's did a pretty good job of letting that stuff go and allowing the teams to play it out rather than calling a personal foul on every play, even though they probably could have. It was an extremely intense rivalry game, and the dirty play was being dished out accross the board. I'm not arguing that the dawgs were worse than the Gators, and I'm not implying that Spikes was at all justified in sticking his hand inside Ealey's helmet. I don't care if Spikes was provoked, it was a bad move. All I'm saying is that like Chris Rock,
I UNDERSTAND.
Now how many games would be enough for you? One? Two? The bowl game (thats the game played at the end of the year after you've won at least half of your games, in case you Vol fans have forgotten)? The guy screwed up. I'll give you that. What you don't know is motive or intent, and you don't even have a victim. Even Ealey thinks you're blowing this out of proportion.