There's no need
The thread starter can correct me if I'm wrong, but the point of the OP is to illustrate - which the OP does very well - that just because a team falters, and does so at "critical" moments when regular season games are on the line, doesn't mean the team is terminally flawed and incapable of competing well in the Tourney.
It's a simple concept, which the 05/06 team (and many others teams), and the specific examples given, demonstrates with great clarity and flair
Yes, you can point out why you believe this team is otherwise flawed or has weaknesses and won't do well, etc. etc. etc. ad nauseum. But, the fact that this team has faltered and blown leads a few times is no guarantee
of failure. Not sure why there's so much argument against a premise that has been so well, and so simply, proven.