Quote:
Originally Posted by MastaG8r
No, I understand it perfectly. As I've said all along, the issue is not that they were wholly inaccurate comments. The point is that it was a really weak way for the U.S. Secretary of State to sell the virtues of free speech to people in a country that allows a little less of it than we do. They were poorly-worded comments, as evidenced by your efforts to defend them by re-wording them instead of just saying, "I'm fine with what he said," like dangole did.
|
My first response to you was to quote the actual comment. So the rewording argument is also very weak.
So what is weak about the comment? Are you concerned about the lack of respect to Nazis or the Phelps people?
Linear Mode
