Stupidest viral claims of 2012

[ChartsandGrafs]

Originally Posted by gatorev12

Illuminating as to the maturity of the poster...but given his posting history, I'm not surprised he comes across as rather childish.

All I do is hold the mirror up. What you see is merely just a reflection of what you are.

Don't be mad. I'm just the messenger.

[orangeblueorangeblue]

Deep, man.

[orangeblueorangeblue]

Originally Posted by ChartsandGrafs

No, not really. You made an assumption you later felt the need to apologize for.

That doesn't sound very informed at all.

Let you in on a little secret: I stand by that assumption.

[ChartsandGrafs]

Originally Posted by orangeblueorangeblue

Let you in on a little secret: I stand by that assumption.

I'd expect nothing less.

[orangeblueorangeblue]

I'm a Bilderberg Group Operative, what can I say?

[ChartsandGrafs]

Originally Posted by orangeblueorangeblue

I'm a Bilderberg Group Operative, what can I say?

Not smart enough. DMV worker, perhaps, but not Bilderberg operative.

Maybe some other time.

[orangeblueorangeblue]

It's a shame, because some of the superficial or imaginary narrative talking points the conspiracy fans perpetuate tend to muddy the waters for real problems espoused by the same people, like military drone use.

Instead of making people think anyone who speaks ill of military drone use is an idiot, just keep ignorance of fiat currency systems to yourself.

Now back to the prison planet and my CFR meeting ...

[ChartsandGrafs]

Originally Posted by orangeblueorangeblue

It's a shame, because some of the superficial or imaginary narrative talking points the conspiracy fans perpetuate tend to muddy the waters for real problems espoused by the same people, like military drone use.

Instead of making people think anyone who speaks ill of military drone use is an idiot, just keep ignorance of fiat currency systems to yourself.

Now back to the prison planet and my CFR meeting ...

LOL, "ignorance". Says the guy educated in economics by the State's gaggle of clown economists. That's pretty rich.

Tell me, how much is all the real estate that I own inside your head worth?

[orangeblueorangeblue]

Right, I always forget that higher education is the tool of the globalist bankers.

You just can't win!

[ChartsandGrafs]

Originally Posted by orangeblueorangeblue

Right, I always forget that higher education is the tool of the globalist bankers.

You just can't win!

Of course you can't win. You're too uninformed and just plain wrong to win. Pitching an internet fit at me isn't going to solve that.

Here, read and learn something for a change. It's not hard, I promise:

The Federal Reserve, through its extensive network of consultants, visiting scholars, alumni and staff economists, so thoroughly dominates the field of economics that real criticism of the central bank has become a career liability for members of the profession, an investigation by the Huffington Post has found.

This dominance helps explain how, even after the Fed failed to foresee the greatest economic collapse since the Great Depression, the central bank has largely escaped criticism from academic economists. In the Fed's thrall, the economists missed it,

"The Fed has a lock on the economics world," says Joshua Rosner, a Wall Street analyst who correctly called the meltdown. "There is no room for other views, which I guess is why economists

One critical way the Fed exerts control on academic economists is through its relationships with the field's gatekeepers. For instance, at the Journal of Monetary Economics, a must-publish venue for rising economists, more than half of the editorial board members are currently on the Fed payroll --and the rest have been in the past.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0..._n_278805.html

[orangeblueorangeblue]

Of course, I know better because I actually went to school, met these people, worked in the industry and learned how the Fed actually works.

You know better because you went to abovetopsecret.com.

[orangeblueorangeblue]

And had you read anything I've ever written about the subject, you'd know I think our Federal Reserve Bank is totally flawed. But nah ...

[ChartsandGrafs]

Originally Posted by orangeblueorangeblue

Of course, I know better because I actually went to school, met these people, worked in the industry and learned how the Fed actually works.

LOL, and the laugh riot continues...

You went to a State/Federal Reserve indoctrination farm, met and hobnobbed with a bunch of shills, drew a paycheck from a system based on institutional fraud, and learned a sanitized, government-approved version of how the Fed works.

You know better because you went to abovetopsecret.com.

Project much?

[orangeblueorangeblue]

Originally Posted by ChartsandGrafs

LOL, and the laugh riot continues...

You went to a State/Federal Reserve indoctrination farm, met and hobnobbed with a bunch of shills, drew a paycheck from a system based on institutional fraud, and learned a sanitized, government-approved version of how the Fed works.

And you went to nothing and did nothing.

[ChartsandGrafs]

Originally Posted by orangeblueorangeblue

And you went to nothing and did nothing.

Let's assume this is true for a moment. I'm a nobody who went nowhere and did nothing. We'll also ignore the fact that this would logically have no bearing on the validity of my arguments.

If this is true, why do I apparently own so much real estate inside your head? Personally speaking, I ignore the kind of people you described. They bore me. I might give them a few responses, but then I move on, almost permanently. On the other hand, when it comes to me, you can't leave me alone. You always come back, engage me, and then whine when I don't roll over and give you the last line. Always. You can't seem to rationally refute anything I say. It's a mix of one-liners, innuendos, and petty, mocking attacks.

If I previously embarrassed you in a prior debate or made you feel shame, speaking man to man, I'm sorry. So how is it going to be?

[orangeblueorangeblue]

Originally Posted by ChartsandGrafs

Let's assume this is true for a moment. I'm a nobody who went nowhere and did nothing. We'll also ignore the fact that this would logically have no bearing on the validity of my arguments.

Yes, a lack of knowledge has no bearing on the validity of your knowledge-free arguments.

If this is true, why do I apparently own so much real estate inside your head?

I have literally thought about you for maybe 2 minutes while replying to this thread. I'd wager you've devoted more energy to me, considering you know what I went to school for. I couldn't say a thing about you except that you don't know much and think all education is brainwashing.

[orangeblueorangeblue]

But I do like the "you're obsessed with me!" method of bailing on an argument. Totally novel. Keep with it.

[ChartsandGrafs]

Originally Posted by orangeblueorangeblue

Yes, a lack of knowledge has no bearing on the validity of your knowledge-free arguments.

LOL, you obviously didn't read the line you quoted and responded to.

Government education for the win!

I have literally thought about you for maybe 2 minutes while replying to this thread. I'd wager you've devoted more energy to me, considering you know what I went to school for. I couldn't say a thing about you except that you don't know much and think all education is brainwashing.

If you don't know anything about me, how do you know I don't know anything, didn't go anywhere, and didn't do anything. As usual, you're not making any sense.

I suspect that this is because you are all hot and bothered. Chill, man, chill.

[orangeblueorangeblue]

You have seriously trotted out the "u mad" and "you're obsessed" dodges in the same thread. That might be an Internet first.

[ChartsandGrafs]

Originally Posted by orangeblueorangeblue

You have seriously trotted out the "u mad" and "you're obsessed" dodges in the same thread. That might be an Internet first.

LOL, says the guy who trotted out "burn?" right from the start.

Weak. Troll. Sauce.