Saw the movie. See in 3d..good visuals.
Observations...in a classic turn of events...
TOM CRUISE and KELLY MCGILLIS in TOP GUN ..ole Tom was such a terrific lover, KELLY felt obligated to admit she is gay. Scintillating love scenes...uh, no.
Now, on STAR TREK we have Spock and Uhura. Ole Zoe does her best but , sadly SPOCK has to admit he is invulnerable to her charms..and that he is gay.
Acting at it's finest.
The use of the OMEGA 3 machine at the end to ambush KHAN was pure genius.
Interesting that ONE episode in the original STAR TREK spawned a movie and ...another movie .
Seems HOLLYWOOD just likes to recycle old storylines...Thanks for black holes....
We now know the real reason for black holes..they are there to save the writers. In the first movie , blowing up VULCAN and GIVING THE WRITERS carte Blanche to write anything they want was a big green light.
Freedom from having an original thought as well.
This time around we bring back KHAN. Great.
Notice the tribble in medical bay late in the film ? I did.
Here is a SPOILER ALERT for Star Trek III...
A GIANT PYRAMIDAL SHAPED OBJECT is home to the GROG, a race which assimilates all other races, uses prostheses like crazy and needs to use sunscreen.
They are coming to assimilate all gay cast members on THE ENTERPRISE. Looks like this will end the series for certain.lol
My girlfriend and I just sew it in 3-D... Wow that was killer cool. It wasn't I-Max, but good none the less. My next movie adventure will be Iron Man 3 in I-Max.
The first one was just all over the place IMO, got a little too silly at times, but my main problem is that the only premise Abrams could write a script around was time travel?
That's kind of like making another Superman movie with Lex Luther as the villain.
Really, it was a disappointing movie.
I might go see this one because you suggested it Princess, but honestly, I'm a real strong script/acting driven kind of movie-goer. If it's just mostly action-based, I'll walk away disappointed again.
Don't get me wrong, sometimes you go to see a movie for nothing but action, but that's what I'm expecting when I go in, just some fun, crazy mayhem, but overall, I like a movie with extremely strong, well-written characters who carry a movie more than the action and fancy sets.
That's what makes Batman Begins so good IMO.
__________________ Resistance is futile. Schedule is irrelevant, opponent is irrelevant... We are Gator, you will be assimilated.
The first one was just all over the place IMO, got a little too silly at times, but my main problem is that the only premise Abrams could write a script around was time travel?
That's kind of like making another Superman movie with Lex Luther as the villain.
Really, it was a disappointing movie.
I might go see this one because you suggested it Princess, but honestly, I'm a real strong script/acting driven kind of movie-goer. If it's just mostly action-based, I'll walk away disappointed again.
Don't get me wrong, sometimes you go to see a movie for nothing but action, but that's what I'm expecting when I go in, just some fun, crazy mayhem, but overall, I like a movie with extremely strong, well-written characters who carry a movie more than the action and fancy sets.
That's what makes Batman Begins so good IMO.
This one is better on all fronts and I was on plot hole patrol due to the hundreds of them in the previous effort. I had quibbles with this one, but nothing major.
__________________
The poster formerly known as shabadoo25
Star Trek Into Darkness.
Hybrid Mode
