Separate names with a comma.
are you serious? those are direct quotes from the No. 2 and 10 posts on this thread.
Merely stating a couple of facts: He does like to insult and he was mistaken ... again.
I didn't say what you knew. I didn't say what your motive was. what I said, twice, was that the truth had been presented to you.
I didn't say I knew your motive. I said you repeated a falsehood even after it was explained to you that it was false.
you mean to tell me that you haven't had the media demand to know who you voted for and the racial reasons behind your vote? And then held you up for...
The first time you said that, we can just attribute it to ignorance. Someone sent you an email, you believed it even thought it was completely false....
Conservatives here certainly have an imagination:
"voter fraud is just a figment of the imagination" no one says that, except you guys.
i thought that two or three years ago. but i imagine you're right. they can't keep this up.
i know you love the insults, but if you actually read the thread, you'd realize you're as mistaken as you were on the WMD thread.
didn't work last legislative session. they blocked it again, just like the year before ...
Funny how some people can't be bothered to see if the same thread exists just a couple of threads down.
Reminds me of Florida Republicans blocking growler bills because the Bud distributors gave them a lot of money.
The thread started off with "OUCH!!!" as though this were some shocking and painful revelation. But it's not. That should be clear.
have you read the thread?
as Volokh said, the courts have ruled that asking for transcripts of what was said is constitutional when you're in discovery during a lawsuit.
so, in your opinion, this thread tells us nothing new? there's no "OUCH!?"
I don't think the percentage of blacks voting for Obama has been any kind of secret.
i'm sure some did. is that really a surprise? what do you guys figure is the painful revelation here?
This is the Democrats' fault?