PDA

View Full Version : Possible New Rule


bperkins10
02-13-2013, 09:21 PM
I just came across this article about a possible rule change for hits to the head. It looks like the rules committee is seriously considering an ejecting players from the game for those type of hits. I am not sure I like it because I have seen plenty of legit hits that were flagged and would result in an ejection from the game.

I can see this costing teams some games.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/college-football/news/20130213/ncaa-rule-change-ejection.ap/?sct=hp_t2_a10&eref=sihp

gator1986
02-13-2013, 09:26 PM
You know people know what they're doing when they play the sport.. They know what they're getting themselves into... They weigh it out and see if the risk is worth the reward, and to them it is. They have absolutely every idea of what they're getting themselves into, if you don like it don't play. People watch and pay for a contact sport with explosive hits. Take it all away or minimize it you get soccer, which the sport will become unwatchable. No one watches soccer.

trekcid
02-13-2013, 09:36 PM
Just watched it come across ESPN during Duke BB game. Has one more step to become
new Rule. Rule will focus on hits to WR and QB that are hit above shoulders that cannot
defend themselves prior to contact.

geauxgator1
02-13-2013, 09:48 PM
I can see the refs really coming after UF hard on this rule while of course Alabama slides. If it happens, you can bet we get the short end of that stick.

g8rphan19
02-13-2013, 09:48 PM
geez lets just put flags on them already...talk about taking the fun out of playing defense

petro
02-13-2013, 10:06 PM
They should eject QBs for errant throws that cause the WR's to expose themselves. Eliminate those bad throws that are the root cause.

They should also eject WR's that fail to recognize they are exposing themselves by extending to catch errant throws that put them in a vulnerable position, thus risking their health and NFL careers.

They should provide automatic first downs for any QB that ducks and drops to avoid an onrushing D lineman because it might hurt, and auto first downs for any receiver that gets alligator arms and dives to avoid a collision errrrrrrrr I mean getting tackled.

This is the beginning of the end..... creep creep creep creep.

GunGator
02-13-2013, 10:14 PM
geez lets just put flags on them already...talk about taking the fun out of playing defense

http://screeninvasion.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/1608-sarcastaball-2-660x371.jpg

gator1986
02-13-2013, 10:17 PM
Hahaha sarcastiball!!!!! Hahahaha!!!

Tasselhoff
02-13-2013, 11:07 PM
If it bec omes a rule I would hope that refs are restrained I their evaluation ofit. U fortunately I doubt they will be. Any team known for a hard hitting d will be targeted.

socraticsilence
02-14-2013, 06:28 AM
I can see the refs really coming after UF hard on this rule while of course Alabama slides. If it happens, you can bet we get the short end of that stick.

Whoever plays Bama in Atlanta better dress 120 or just accept getting scored on, because any hard hit is going to be an ejection.

sleeze
02-14-2013, 07:18 AM
Nm

tilly
02-14-2013, 08:33 AM
If this rule is passed it needs to be reviewable

96Gatorcise
02-14-2013, 08:47 AM
You know people know what they're doing when they play the sport.. They know what they're getting themselves into... They weigh it out and see if the risk is worth the reward, and to them it is. They have absolutely every idea of what they're getting themselves into, if you don like it don't play. People watch and pay for a contact sport with explosive hits. Take it all away or minimize it you get soccer, which the sport will become unwatchable. No one watches soccer.

I agree with you adults know what they are signing up for but I believe rules like this are being looked at for the long term success of the game.

More evidence about concussions and brain damage continues to come out and more parents are turning their kids away from the game. If something is not changed the talent pool will shrink and the game as a whole will suffer.

SmootyGator
02-14-2013, 09:22 AM
They should eject QBs for errant throws that cause the WR's to expose themselves. Eliminate those bad throws that are the root cause.

They should also eject WR's that fail to recognize they are exposing themselves by extending to catch errant throws that put them in a vulnerable position, thus risking their health and NFL careers.

They should provide automatic first downs for any QB that ducks and drops to avoid an onrushing D lineman because it might hurt, and auto first downs for any receiver that gets alligator arms and dives to avoid a collision errrrrrrrr I mean getting tackled.

This is the beginning of the end..... creep creep creep creep.

I was going to post something like this one day. Love it!

Bushmaster
02-14-2013, 09:26 AM
You know people know what they're doing when they play the sport.. They know what they're getting themselves into... They weigh it out and see if the risk is worth the reward, and to them it is. They have absolutely every idea of what they're getting themselves into, if you don like it don't play. People watch and pay for a contact sport with explosive hits. Take it all away or minimize it you get soccer, which the sport will become unwatchable. No one watches soccer.

I don't know about that. I saw a soccer player get brushed across the arm and they had to carry him off the field. It was vicious I tell ya.

Claygator
02-14-2013, 12:37 PM
The definition of "intentional" will clearly be in the eyes of the beholder.

cocodrilo
02-14-2013, 01:41 PM
There were plenty of fans back in the days of leather helmets, no face masks, etc. (I guess before face-mask penalties they had penalties for grabbing a player by the mouth.) Of course it can be argued that back in those days Americans simply hadn't learn yet to enjoy violence. (In the movies back then, even murder, if gruesome, had to committed off screen.)

gatorman_07732
02-14-2013, 01:51 PM
I saw these refs call helmet to helmet and ended up being wrong. So now he could have players ejected for no good reason.

urg8rbait
02-14-2013, 03:45 PM
I am ok with this rule as long as the refs look at a replay to ensure the ejection is warranted.

Spurffelbow833
02-16-2013, 10:20 AM
Football is jumping the shark because of this type of stuff. The players are so big and fast now that the violence cannot be dismissed as "part of the game" anymore. Every rule change and oversight they stick in to dampen down the intensity of play to make the game safer will also make it less entertaining.

OaktownGator
02-16-2013, 10:26 AM
I saw these refs call helmet to helmet and ended up being wrong. So now he could have players ejected for no good reason.

Agree - this could easily be abused and turn the outcome of games.

tilly
02-16-2013, 11:06 AM
Agree - this could easily be abused and turn the outcome of games.

Agree....Like I said the rule has to have a clause where a hit is reviewable by replay to determine in slow motion if that sort of contact took place.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Tablet using Gator Country

JohnC1908
02-16-2013, 11:27 AM
I don't trust the refs during a review either.

tilly
02-16-2013, 11:33 AM
I don't trust the refs during a review either.

Truth...but at least they will be forced to slow it down. No ref wants tonlive with blowing a big call like that.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Tablet using Gator Country